Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

agent-workflow(Agent 工作流程)

agent-workflow 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agent-workflow 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 56,028。

总安装 465周安装 19GitHub Stars 2下载 150核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agent-workflow(Agent 工作流程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-gods
仓库路径:skills/agent-workflow
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-gods --skill agent-workflow
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-gods --skill agent-workflow

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

优化 Agent 日常操作流程,保持会话清洁与工具链稳定。适用于恢复上下文过载、管理执行表面和快速故障恢复。使用时聚焦最小可重复循环,按需加载参考材料。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-gods --skill agent-workflow 建议定期清理临时状态,避免工具残留影响后续任务。

来源仓库内路径:skills/agent-workflow

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-gods --skill agent-workflow;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

agent-workflow 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/akillness/oh-my-gods --skill agent-workflow。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agent-workflow 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agent-workflow 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

agent-workflow 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

agent-workflow 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 465 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 150 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agent-workflow 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
agent-workflow

Agent 工作流程 · 本页

4652操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

AI Agent Workflow

Agent-workflow requests are usually about choosing the smallest repeatable loop that keeps the agent effective: start the session cleanly, keep repo work grounded, use the right execution surface, and recover quickly when context or tooling drifts. Keep the entrypoint focused on workflow triage and load the references only when the user needs exact command recipes or deeper patterns.

When to use this skill

  • Set up a clean daily workflow for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or a mixed-agent toolchain
  • Recover from context overload, bad session hygiene, or tool sprawl
  • Decide how to split work across chat, shell, MCP, worktrees, and multiple agents
  • Choose a practical repo-delivery loop for edit, test, review, and PR work
  • Improve runtime verification habits, especially when a live browser or app matters

Prefer a narrower sibling skill when the main job is more specific:

  • git-workflow for branch, commit, rebase, push, and PR coordination
  • agent-configuration for hooks, permissions, skills, plugins, and project instruction files
  • playwriter when browser or runtime verification should use the live browser session
  • clawteam, omg, omx, or ohmg when the user explicitly wants an orchestrated team workflow rather than a general operating loop

Instructions

Step 1: Classify the workflow request before prescribing commands

Sort the request into one or two primary lanes:

  • session-control: startup, context reset, prompt hygiene, resume, handoff
  • repo-delivery: inspect, edit, test, verify, commit, PR
  • tools-and-runtime: shell vs MCP vs browser vs extension surface
  • multi-agent: delegation, worktrees, role split, synthesis

Ground the workflow with the active agent surface, current repo state, and the pain point that is slowing the user down. Do not dump a universal command list before the workflow lane is clear.

Step 2: Choose the smallest operating loop that fits

Use these defaults unless the environment proves otherwise:

  • start with the lightest loop that can finish the job safely
  • keep read-only inspection cheap before switching to edits or broad tool use
  • prefer one bounded branch or worktree per meaningful change lane
  • keep browser verification explicit when runtime behavior matters
  • recover from context drift by resetting or handing off, not by piling more instructions into the same polluted session

Step 3: Pull the matching reference, not the whole package

Load only the reference that matches the user's job:

  • references/session-and-context-management.md for startup, reset, resume, handoff, and context hygiene
  • references/repo-delivery-and-runtime-loops.md for shell, test, PR, worktree, and live-verification workflow patterns
  • references/mcp-and-multi-agent-patterns.md for MCP usage, delegation, specialist routing, and cross-agent orchestration

Step 4: Keep workflow advice grounded in the actual surface

Before recommending a loop, confirm the relevant runtime facts:

  • which agent or CLI is active
  • whether the job is read-only, implementation, review, or verification
  • whether a repo, remote, branch, or running app is already in play
  • whether the browser or runtime check should use playwriter instead of a fresh headless browser

Do not prescribe worktree, PR, MCP, or multi-agent flows as generic defaults when the task is small enough to finish directly.

Step 5: Verify the workflow result

After choosing or applying the workflow, verify with the smallest relevant checks:

  • repo state or branch state if the workflow touched code
  • test or build status if the workflow included implementation
  • browser or runtime checks when the workflow claims behavior changed
  • explicit next owner or handoff state when the loop is not fully local

Do not claim the workflow is improved until the post-action state matches the intended operating lane.

Examples

Example 1: Recover a polluted session

Input:

My agent session is getting slow and confused. What workflow should I use to
reset without losing useful context?

Expected shape:

  • classifies this as a session-control problem first
  • recommends reset, resume, or handoff tactics instead of piling on prompts
  • preserves only the context needed for the next bounded task

Example 2: Pick a repo-delivery loop

Input:

What is a good daily workflow for using Claude or Codex to inspect code, make a
change, run tests, and open a PR without the session getting messy?

Expected shape:

  • picks a compact inspect-edit-verify-commit loop
  • uses worktrees or branches only when the scope justifies them
  • includes verification before PR creation

Example 3: Decide between shell, MCP, and browser surfaces

Input:

I can use shell tools, MCP servers, or browser automation. How should I decide
which workflow to use for a task?

Expected shape:

  • distinguishes read-only shell work from external-service or runtime needs
  • keeps MCP or browser usage scoped to tasks that actually benefit from them
  • routes live browser verification to playwriter when the active session matters

Example 4: Split a multi-agent task

Input:

I want one agent researching, another implementing, and another validating.
What workflow keeps that from turning into chaos?

Expected shape:

  • classifies this as a multi-agent workflow problem
  • recommends bounded ownership, artifact handoff, and synthesis checkpoints
  • avoids parallelizing work that is still on the critical path

Best practices

  1. Start from the actual bottleneck, not a memorized command catalog
  2. Keep the primary loop small: inspect, act, verify, summarize
  3. Use worktrees and multi-agent splits only when they reduce contention or waiting
  4. Prefer live-browser verification via playwriter when runtime behavior matters
  5. Reset or hand off polluted context instead of dragging stale assumptions forward
  6. Keep detailed command recipes and platform-specific examples in references so the entrypoint stays compact and triggerable

References

平台分布

Codex

36.64%
按下载量换算55

Claude

30.66%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

18.98%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

9.9%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills