aif-loop（aif 循环）

Loop - Reflex Iteration Workflow

Run a result-focused iterative loop with strict phase contracts, evaluation rules, and persistent state between sessions.

Step 0: Load Config

FIRST: Read .ai-factory/config.yaml if it exists to resolve:

• Paths: paths.description, paths.architecture, paths.rules_file, paths.roadmap, paths.research, paths.plan, paths.plans, and paths.evolution
• Language: language.ui for prompts, language.artifacts for generated content

If config.yaml doesn't exist, use defaults:

• Paths: .ai-factory/ for all artifacts
• Language: en (English)

Terminology:

• loop = one full execution for a task alias (stored in run.json, identified by run_id)
• iteration = one cycle inside that loop

Core Idea

Each iteration executes 6 phases with parallel execution where possible:

1. PLAN - short plan for current iteration
2. PRODUCE - produce one artifact.md ← runs in parallel with PREPARE
3. PREPARE - generate check scripts and test definitions from rules ← runs in parallel with PRODUCE
4. EVALUATE - run prepared checks + content rules against artifact, score result. Uses parallel Task agents for independent check groups
5. CRITIQUE - precise issues + fixes (only if fail)
6. REFINE - rewrite artifact using critique (only if fail)

         PLAN
           │
    ┌──────┴──────┐
    ↓             ↓          ← parallel (Task tool)
 PRODUCE      PREPARE
 (artifact)   (checks)
    ↓             ↓
    └──────┬──────┘
           ↓
       EVALUATE              ← parallel check execution (Task tool)
       ┌───┼───┐
       ↓   ↓   ↓
      exec content aggregate
       └───┼───┘
           ↓
       CRITIQUE (if fail)
           ↓
       REFINE (if fail)

Stop when quality is good enough, no major issues remain, or iteration limit is reached.

Persistence Contract

Use exactly 3+1 files for state inside the resolved evolution directory (where current.json exists only while a loop is active):

<resolved evolution dir>/current.json
<resolved evolution dir>/<task-alias>/run.json
<resolved evolution dir>/<task-alias>/history.jsonl
<resolved evolution dir>/<task-alias>/artifact.md

Do not create extra index files or per-iteration folder trees unless user explicitly asks.

File Roles

• current.json: pointer to active loop only; delete it when loop becomes completed/stopped/failed
• run.json: single source of truth for current loop state
• history.jsonl: append-only event log (one JSON object per line)
• artifact.md: single source of truth for artifact content (written after PRODUCE and REFINE phases, never duplicated in run.json)

Command Modes

Parse $ARGUMENTS:

• status - show active loop status from current.json and stop
• resume [alias] - continue active loop or loop by alias
• stop [reason] - stop active loop with reason (user_stop if omitted)
• new <task> or no mode + task text - start new loop
• list - list all task aliases with status (running/stopped/completed/failed)
• history [alias] - show event history for a loop (default: active loop)
• clean [alias|--all] - remove loop files for a stopped/completed/failed loop (requires user confirmation, always confirm before deleting)

If no task and no active loop exists, ask user for task prompt.

Step 0: Load Context

Read these files if present:

• the resolved description path
• the resolved architecture path
• the resolved RULES.md path

Use them to keep outputs aligned with project conventions.

Read .ai-factory/skill-context/aif-loop/SKILL.md — MANDATORY if the file exists.

This file contains project-specific rules accumulated by /aif-evolve from patches, codebase conventions, and tech-stack analysis. These rules are tailored to the current project.

How to apply skill-context rules:

• Treat them as project-level overrides for this skill's general instructions
• When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md, the skill-context rule wins (more specific context takes priority — same principle as nested CLAUDE.md files)
• When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context
• Do NOT ignore skill-context rules even if they seem to contradict this skill's defaults — they exist because the project's experience proved the default insufficient
• CRITICAL: skill-context rules apply to ALL outputs of this skill — including the generated artifact, run state, and evaluation criteria. If a skill-context rule says "artifact MUST include X" or "evaluation MUST check Y" — you MUST comply. Producing loop outputs that violate skill-context rules is a bug.

Enforcement: After generating any output artifact, verify it against all skill-context rules. If any rule is violated — fix the output before presenting it to the user.

Step 0.1: Handle Non-Iteration Commands

If command is status, stop, list, history, or clean, execute and stop:

• status: read current.json; if file exists, read pointed run.json and display alias | status | iteration | phase | current_step | last_score | updated_at; if file is missing, report that no loop is active
• stop [reason]: stop active running loop only; set run.json.status = "stopped" and run.json.stop.reason = <reason or "user_stop">, append stopped event to history.jsonl, then delete current.json (active pointer cleared) and exit
• list: scan the resolved evolution directory, read each run.json, display table of alias | status | iteration | last_score | updated_at
• history [alias]: read history.jsonl for the alias (or active loop), display formatted event timeline
• clean [alias|--all]: show what will be deleted, ask for explicit user confirmation via AskUserQuestion, then delete loop directory. Only clean stopped/completed/failed loops — refuse to clean running loops. Update current.json if needed.

Step 1: Initialize or Resume Loop

1.1 Ensure directories

mkdir -p <resolved evolution dir>

1.2 Alias and IDs (new loop)

Generate:

• task_alias: lowercase hyphen slug (3-64 chars)
• run_id: <task_alias>-<yyyyMMdd-HHmmss>

1.3 Write current.json

{
  "active_run_id": "courses-api-ddd-20260218-120000",
  "task_alias": "courses-api-ddd",
  "status": "running",
  "updated_at": "2026-02-18T12:00:00Z"
}

1.4 Write initial run.json

{
  "run_id": "courses-api-ddd-20260218-120000",
  "task_alias": "courses-api-ddd",
  "status": "running",
  "iteration": 1,
  "max_iterations": 4,
  "phase": "A",
  "current_step": "PLAN",
  "task": {
    "prompt": "OpenAPI 3.1 spec + DDD notes + JSON examples",
    "ideal_result": "..."
  },
  "criteria": {
    "name": "loop_default_v1",
    "version": 1,
    "phase": {
      "A": { "threshold": 0.8, "active_levels": ["A"] },
      "B": { "threshold": 0.9, "active_levels": ["A", "B"] }
    },
    "rules": []
  },
  "plan": [],
  "prepared_checks": null,
  "evaluation": null,
  "critique": null,
  "stop": { "passed": false, "reason": "" },
  "last_score": 0,
  "stagnation_count": 0,
  "created_at": "2026-02-18T12:00:00Z",
  "updated_at": "2026-02-18T12:00:00Z"
}

1.5 Resume Logic

When resuming a loop:

1. Read run.json to get current_step and iteration
2. Read last event from history.jsonl to confirm consistency
3. If run.json.current_step indicates a phase was interrupted:

- Re-execute from that phase (do not skip) - PRODUCE_PREPARE: always re-run both PRODUCE and PREPARE (idempotent — artifact overwrites, checks regenerate)

1. If run.json.status is stopped, completed, or failed, inform user and suggest new (for failed runs, also show the last phase_error event from history.jsonl so user understands what went wrong)

Step 2: Interactive Setup (new loop)

Quick mode (default, confirmation-first)

If the task prompt contains enough context to infer task type and ideal result:

1. Auto-detect task type from prompt (API spec, code, docs, config)
2. Load matching template from references/CRITERIA-TEMPLATES.md
3. Draft inferred rules, phase thresholds (fallback: A=0.8, B=0.9), and max iterations (default: 4)
4. Show inferred settings as a draft summary
5. Always ask explicit confirmation of success criteria (rules/thresholds) via AskUserQuestion, even if criteria were already present in the task text
6. Always ask explicit confirmation of max iterations via AskUserQuestion, even if iteration count was already present in the task text
7. If user changes either criteria or max iterations, update the draft and re-confirm both fields
8. Start iteration 1 only after both confirmations are explicit
9. If task type cannot be auto-detected (ambiguous or mixed prompt), fall through to full setup immediately

Full setup

Critical guardrail:

• Always re-ask and explicitly confirm success criteria and max iterations, even if both are already written in the task prompt.

Ask concise setup questions before first iteration:

1. Task type - what kind of artifact? (API spec, code, docs, config, other) - used to load template from references/CRITERIA-TEMPLATES.md
2. Ideal result definition
3. Mandatory checks (tests, schema/contract, specific requirements)
4. Quality threshold (A/B phases)
5. Max iterations (default: 4)
6. What counts as a major issue
7. Explicit confirmation: "Confirm these success criteria?"
8. Explicit confirmation: "Confirm max iterations = N?"

Generate evaluation rules from answers:

• Load matching template from references/CRITERIA-TEMPLATES.md as starting point
• Add task-specific rules based on ideal result and mandatory checks
• Let user review and adjust rules before starting

Persist answers and generated rules inside run.json.criteria (snapshot for reproducibility).

Never treat criteria or iteration limits parsed from task text as final until the user explicitly confirms both.

Normalization rules before persisting:

• run.json.max_iterations is the single source of truth for iteration limit
• every rule must be expanded to full RULE-SCHEMA format (id, description, severity, weight, phase, check)
• if template shorthand omitted weight, derive from severity (fail=2, warn=1, info=0)

Step 3: Phase Contracts

Before running phases, load:

• references/PHASE-CONTRACTS.md - strict I/O contracts for each phase
• references/RULE-SCHEMA.md - rule format and score calculation

3.1 Phases

• PLAN - generates iteration plan (sequential)
• PRODUCE - generates artifact (parallel with PREPARE)
• PREPARE - generates check scripts/definitions from rules + task prompt (parallel with PRODUCE)
• EVALUATE - runs prepared checks + content rules, aggregates score (parallel check groups via Task)
• CRITIQUE - identifies issues with fix instructions (sequential, only on fail)
• REFINE - applies fixes to artifact (sequential, only on fail)

3.2 Parallel Execution Model

Two levels of parallelism via Task tool:

1. Inter-phase: PRODUCE and PREPARE run as parallel Task agents after PLAN completes. Both depend only on PLAN output.
2. Intra-phase: EVALUATE spawns parallel Task agents for independent check groups (executable checks via Bash, content rules via Read/Grep). Aggregates results into final score.

3.3 Phase Output Format

Each phase produces its defined output (see PHASE-CONTRACTS.md). No envelope wrapping. No router output.

Step 4: Iteration Execution

For each iteration:

1. Set run.json.current_step = "PLAN", run PLAN phase
2. Set run.json.current_step = "PRODUCE_PREPARE", launch both as parallel Task agents:

- Task A (PRODUCE): generates artifact → writes to artifact.md - Task B (PREPARE): generates check scripts/definitions from rules + plan - Wait for both to complete

1. Set run.json.current_step = "EVALUATE", run EVALUATE phase:

- Spawn parallel Task agents for independent check groups: - Executable checks (compile, lint, tests) → Task with Bash - Content rules (structure, completeness, style) → Task with Read/Grep - Aggregate results into score

1. If passed=false:

- Set run.json.current_step = "CRITIQUE", run CRITIQUE phase - Set run.json.current_step = "REFINE", run REFINE phase - Write updated artifact to artifact.md - Increment iteration and continue

1. If phase=A and passed=true:

- Switch to phase=B, activate B-level rules - Set run.json.current_step = "PREPARE", re-run PREPARE with phase=B to materialize B-level checks (no PLAN/PRODUCE — artifact already passed A) - Set run.json.current_step = "EVALUATE", run EVALUATE against the same artifact with B-level prepared checks - If B evaluation also passes → stop with success (threshold_reached) - If B evaluation fails → continue to CRITIQUE → REFINE, then increment iteration

1. If phase=B and passed=true:

- Stop with success (threshold_reached)

Fallback to Sequential

If Task tool is unavailable or returns errors, fall back to sequential execution: PLAN → PRODUCE → PREPARE → EVALUATE → CRITIQUE → REFINE. The loop must work without parallelism.

Step 5: Stop Conditions

Stop when any condition is met:

1. phase=B and passed=true (reason=threshold_reached)
2. no fail-severity rules failed in current evaluation (reason=no_major_issues) — even if score is below threshold, the artifact has no blocking issues and only warn/info remain
3. iteration >= run.max_iterations (reason=iteration_limit)
4. explicit user stop (reason=user_stop)
5. stagnation detected (reason=stagnation)

Stagnation rule

Track score progress:

• delta = score - last_score
• if delta < 0.02 and there are no severity fail blockers, increment stagnation_count
• if stagnation_count >= 2, stop with stagnation

Step 6: Persistence Writes (every step)

After each phase output:

1. Update run.json (including current_step)
2. Append event to history.jsonl
3. Update current.json.updated_at
4. Write artifact.md to disk after PRODUCE and REFINE phases
5. Before REFINE overwrites artifact.md, save a SHA-256 hash of the previous artifact in the refinement_done event payload as "previous_artifact_hash" (enables integrity verification without bloating history)

Event names:

• run_started
• plan_created
• artifact_created
• checks_prepared
• evaluation_done
• critique_done
• refinement_done
• phase_switched
• iteration_advanced
• phase_error
• stopped
• failed

history.jsonl example line:

{"ts":"2026-02-18T12:01:10Z","run_id":"courses-api-ddd-20260218-120000","iteration":1,"phase":"A","step":"EVALUATE","event":"evaluation_done","status":"ok","payload":{"score":0.72,"passed":false}}

Step 7: Post-Loop

After the loop stops (any reason):

1. Display final state summary (iteration, max_iterations, phase, final score, stop reason)
2. If stop reason = iteration_limit and latest evaluation has passed=false, include mandatory distance-to-success details:

- active phase threshold and final score - numeric gap to threshold (threshold - score, floor at 0) - remaining failed fail-severity rule count + blocking rule IDs - rules progress (passed_rules / total_rules)

1. Ask user where to save the final artifact (default: keep it in <resolved evolution dir>/<alias>/artifact.md)
2. Offer to copy artifact to a user-specified path
3. Suggest next skills based on artifact type:

- API spec -> /aif-plan to implement it - Code -> /aif-verify to check it - Docs -> /aif-docs to integrate it

1. Update run.json.status based on stop reason, and if current.json points to this loop, delete current.json (no active loop remains):

Step 8: Response Format to User

Show a compact summary after each iteration — do NOT dump full run.json or artifact.md content into the conversation. The artifact is already on disk; duplicating it wastes context.

Iteration summary format

── Iteration {N}/{max} | Phase {A|B} | Score: {score} | {PASS|FAIL} ──
Plan: {1-line summary of plan focus}
Hash: {first 8 chars of artifact SHA-256}
Changed: {list of added/modified sections, or "initial generation"}
Failed: {comma-separated rule IDs, or "none"}
Warnings: {comma-separated rule IDs, or "none"}
Artifact: <resolved evolution dir>/<alias>/artifact.md

• Hash — lets the user verify which version they're looking at without reading the full artifact
• Changed — shows what actually moved between iterations so regressions are visible from the summary alone

If passed=false, append a compact critique summary (rule ID + 1-line fix instruction per issue). Do not repeat the full artifact or full evaluation object.

When the loop terminates with reason=iteration_limit and passed=false, append a compact distance_to_success block to the final response.

Full output exceptions

Show the full artifact content (not just summary) in these cases only:

1. Loop termination — the final iteration always outputs the complete artifact
2. Phase A → B transition — show the phase-A-passing artifact in full once at the transition boundary for visibility (B-level evaluation still runs immediately per Step 4)
3. Explicit user request — user asks to see the full artifact mid-loop

Step 9: Context Management

The loop generates significant context per iteration (subagent results, evaluation data, critique). After several iterations the conversation context grows large, degrading LLM quality.

All loop state is persisted to disk — clearing context loses nothing. The resume command fully reconstructs state from files.

When to recommend context clear

Recommend clearing context to the user in these situations:

1. After iteration 2 — the midpoint of a default 4-iteration loop
2. On Phase A → B transition — natural boundary, new evaluation scope begins
3. After any iteration where iteration >= 3 — context is already heavy

How to recommend

After the iteration summary, append:

💡 Context is growing. Recommended: /clear then /aif-loop resume
   All state is saved on disk — nothing will be lost.

Do not force or auto-clear. The user decides. If the user ignores the recommendation, continue normally.

Error Recovery

Invalid phase output

If a phase produces output that does not match its contract:

1. Log the error to history.jsonl with event phase_error
2. Retry the phase once with the same inputs
3. If retry also fails, stop the loop with reason=phase_error and display the error

Corrupted run.json

If run.json is missing or unparseable:

1. Read history.jsonl to reconstruct the last known state
2. Rebuild run.json from the most recent events (last iteration, phase, score, etc.)
3. If history.jsonl is also missing/empty, inform user and suggest starting a new loop

Important Rules

1. run.json is the only source of current state truth (does NOT store artifact content)
2. artifact.md on disk is the single source of truth for artifact content — never duplicate it in run.json
3. history.jsonl is append-only; do not edit old events
4. Keep loop fast: short plans, targeted critique, minimal rewrites
5. Do not create extra files beyond the 3+1 persistence files
6. Evaluator must remain strict and non-creative
7. Refiner changes only what is needed to pass failed rules
8. Start simple and add complexity only when metrics show need
9. Retry failed phases exactly once before stopping
10. Use compact iteration summaries by default (Step 8). Full artifact output is allowed only in Step 8 exceptions; never dump full run.json into conversation.
11. Recommend context clear at strategic points (Step 9) — after iteration 2, on phase transition, or when iteration >= 3

Examples

/aif-loop new OpenAPI 3.1 spec + DDD notes + JSON examples
/aif-loop resume
/aif-loop resume courses-api-ddd
/aif-loop status
/aif-loop stop
/aif-loop list
/aif-loop history
/aif-loop history courses-api-ddd
/aif-loop clean courses-api-ddd
/aif-loop clean --all