Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

aif-docs(aif 文档)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

aif-docs 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,656。

总安装 772周安装 25GitHub Stars 535下载 46核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:aif-docs(aif 文档)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lee-to/ai-factory
仓库路径:skills/aif-docs
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lee-to/ai-factory --skill aif-docs
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lee-to/ai-factory --skill aif-docs

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

aif-docs 用于 README 和详细文档的结构化生成与维护。适合将零散信息整理成可读性强、导航清晰的说明材料。遵循 landing-page 原则,README 仅保留关键入口,细节移至 docs/。输出内容需忠实反映已有事实,避免虚构未验证的信息。

aif-docs 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/aif-docs

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lee-to/ai-factory --skill aif-docs;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

aif-docs 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lee-to/ai-factory --skill aif-docs。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

aif-docs 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

aif-docs 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

aif-docs 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

aif-docs 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 772 次,近一周安装 25 次,下载 46 次,GitHub 535 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

aif-docs 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
aif-docs

aif 文档 · 本页

772535需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Docs - Project Documentation Generator

Generate, maintain, and improve project documentation following a landing-page README + detailed docs-directory structure.

Core Principles

  1. README is a landing page, not a manual. ~80-120 lines. First impression, install, quick example, links to details.
  2. Details go to the resolved docs directory (paths.docs, default: docs/). Each file is self-contained — one topic, one page. A user should be able to read a single doc file and get the full picture on that topic.
  3. No duplication. If information lives in the resolved docs directory, README links to it — does not repeat it. Exception: installation command can appear in both (users expect it in README).
  4. Navigation. Every doc file in the resolved docs directory has a header line with prev/next links following the Documentation table order: [← Previous Page](prev.md) · [Back to README](<docs-to-readme-link>) · [Next Page →](next.md). First page has no prev link; last page has no next link. Every page ends with a "See Also" section linking to 2-3 related pages.
  5. Cross-links use relative paths. From README: link to the resolved docs directory path (for example docs/workflow.md by default). Between doc pages in the same directory: workflow.md.
  6. Scannable. Use tables, bullet lists, and code blocks. Avoid long paragraphs. Users scan, they don't read.

Workflow

Step 0: Load Config & Project Context

FIRST: Read .ai-factory/config.yaml if it exists to resolve:

  • Paths: paths.description, paths.architecture, and paths.docs
  • Language: language.ui for prompts and language.artifacts for generated docs

If config.yaml doesn't exist, use defaults:

  • DESCRIPTION.md: .ai-factory/DESCRIPTION.md
  • ARCHITECTURE.md: .ai-factory/ARCHITECTURE.md
  • Docs directory: docs/
  • Language: en (English)

Note: README.md remains the landing page in the project root. Detailed docs are written to the resolved paths.docs directory (default: docs/).

THEN: Read .ai-factory/DESCRIPTION.md (use path from config) if it exists to understand:

  • Tech stack (language, framework, database)
  • Project purpose and architecture
  • Key features and conventions

Also read .ai-factory/ARCHITECTURE.md (use path from config) if it exists to align documentation with the project's structure and boundaries.

Explore the codebase:

  • Read package.json, composer.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, Cargo.toml, etc.
  • Scan src/ structure to understand architecture
  • Look for existing docs, comments, API endpoints, CLI commands
  • Check for existing README.md and the resolved docs directory

Read .ai-factory/skill-context/aif-docs/SKILL.md — MANDATORY if the file exists.

This file contains project-specific rules accumulated by /aif-evolve from patches, codebase conventions, and tech-stack analysis. These rules are tailored to the current project.

How to apply skill-context rules:

  • Treat them as project-level overrides for this skill's general instructions
  • When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md, the skill-context rule wins (more specific context takes priority — same principle as nested CLAUDE.md files)
  • When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context
  • Do NOT ignore skill-context rules even if they seem to contradict this skill's defaults — they exist because the project's experience proved the default insufficient
  • CRITICAL: skill-context rules apply to ALL outputs of this skill — including README.md, documentation pages, and their templates. The templates in this SKILL.md are base structures. If a skill-context rule says "docs MUST include X" or "README MUST have section Y" — you MUST augment the templates accordingly. Generating documentation that violates skill-context rules is a bug.

Enforcement: After generating any output artifact, verify it against all skill-context rules. If any rule is violated — fix the output before presenting it to the user.

Scan for scattered markdown files in project root:

Use Glob to find all *.md files in the project root (exclude node_modules/, .ai-factory/, agent dirs):

CHANGELOG.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, DEPLOYMENT.md,
SECURITY.md, API.md, SETUP.md, DEVELOPMENT.md, TESTING.md, etc.

Record each file, its size, and a brief summary of its content. This list is used in Step 1.1.

Step 0.1: Parse Flags

--web  → Generate HTML version of documentation

Step 1: Determine Current State

Check what documentation already exists:

State A: No README.md                        → Full generation (README + docs dir)
State B: README.md exists, no docs dir      → Analyze README, propose split into docs dir
State C: README.md + docs dir exist         → Depends on flags (see below)

State C with --web flag — ask the user:

Documentation already exists (README.md + resolved docs directory).

AskUserQuestion: What would you like to do?

Options:
1. Generate HTML only — build site from current docs as-is
2. Audit & improve first — check for issues, then generate HTML
3. Audit only — check for issues without generating HTML

Based on choice:

  • Generate HTML only → skip Step 1.1, Step 2, Step 4 — go directly to Step 3 (HTML generation), then done
  • Audit & improve first → run Step 1.1 → Step 2 (State C) → Step 3 → Step 4 → Step 4.1
  • Audit only → run Step 1.1 → Step 2 (State C) → Step 4 → Step 4.1 (skip Step 3)

State C without --web flag → run Step 2 (State C) as usual.

Step 1.1: Check for Scattered Markdown Files

If scattered .md files were found in the project root (from Step 0), propose consolidating them into the resolved docs directory.

Common files that should move to the resolved docs directory:

Root fileTarget in docs dirMerge or move?
CONTRIBUTING.md<resolved docs dir>/contributing.mdMove
ARCHITECTURE.md<resolved docs dir>/architecture.mdMove
DEPLOYMENT.md<resolved docs dir>/deployment.mdMove
SETUP.md<resolved docs dir>/getting-started.mdMerge (append to existing)
DEVELOPMENT.md<resolved docs dir>/getting-started.md or <resolved docs dir>/contributing.mdMerge
API.md<resolved docs dir>/api.mdMove
TESTING.md<resolved docs dir>/testing.mdMove
SECURITY.md<resolved docs dir>/security.mdMove

Files that stay in root (standard convention):

  • README.md — always stays
  • CHANGELOG.md — standard root-level file, keep as-is
  • LICENSE / LICENSE.md — standard root-level file, keep as-is
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md — standard root-level file, keep as-is

If scattered files found, ask the user:

Found [N] markdown files in the project root:

  CONTRIBUTING.md (45 lines) — contribution guidelines
  ARCHITECTURE.md (120 lines) — system architecture overview
  DEPLOYMENT.md (80 lines) — deployment instructions
  SETUP.md (30 lines) — setup guide (overlaps with getting-started)

Suggested actions:
  → Move CONTRIBUTING.md → <resolved docs dir>/contributing.md
  → Move ARCHITECTURE.md → <resolved docs dir>/architecture.md
  → Move DEPLOYMENT.md → <resolved docs dir>/deployment.md
  → Merge SETUP.md into <resolved docs dir>/getting-started.md

AskUserQuestion: Would you like to apply the consolidation?

Options:
1. Apply all suggestions
2. Let me pick which ones
3. Skip — keep files where they are

Based on choice:

  • Apply all suggestions → move/merge all listed files, continue to Step 2
  • Let me pick which ones → present each file individually for approval, apply selected
  • Skip → leave files where they are, continue to Step 2

When moving/merging:

  1. Create the target file in the resolved docs directory with prev/next navigation header (following Documentation table order) and "See Also" footer
  2. If merging into an existing doc — append content under a new section header, avoid duplicating info that's already there
  3. Do NOT delete originals yet — keep them until the review step confirms everything is in place
  4. Add the new doc page to README's Documentation table using the correct path relative to README
  5. Update any links in other files that pointed to the old root-level file
  6. Record which files were moved/merged — this list is used in Step 4.1

IMPORTANT: Never force-move files. Always show the plan and get user approval first.

Step 2 (State A): Generate from Scratch

When no README.md exists, generate the full documentation set.

2.1: Analyze project for documentation topics

Explore the codebase and identify documentation topics:

Always include:
- getting-started.md    (installation, setup, quick start)

Include if relevant:
- architecture.md       (if project has clear architecture: services, modules, layers)
- api.md                (if project exposes API endpoints)
- configuration.md      (if project has config files, env vars, feature flags)
- deployment.md         (if Dockerfile, CI/CD, deploy scripts exist)
- contributing.md       (if open-source or team project)
- security.md           (if auth, permissions, or security patterns exist)
- testing.md            (if test suite exists)
- cli.md                (if project has CLI commands)

Ask the user:

I've analyzed your project and suggest these documentation pages:

1. getting-started.md — Installation, setup, quick start
2. architecture.md — Project structure and patterns
3. api.md — API endpoints reference
4. configuration.md — Environment variables and config

AskUserQuestion: Would you like to generate these documentation pages?

Options:
1. Generate all of these
2. Let me pick which ones
3. Add more topics

Based on choice:

  • Generate all → proceed to generate README.md and all listed doc files in the resolved docs directory
  • Let me pick → present each topic for individual approval, generate only approved
  • Add more topics → ask what additional topics to include, confirm final list, then generate
2.2: Generate README.md

Structure (aim for ~80-120 lines):

# Project Name

> One-line tagline describing the project.

Brief 2-3 sentence description of what this project does and why it exists.

## Quick Start

\`\`\`bash
# Installation steps (1-3 commands)
\`\`\`

## Key Features

- **Feature 1** — brief description
- **Feature 2** — brief description
- **Feature 3** — brief description

## Example

\`\`\`
# Show a real usage example — this is where users decide "I want this"
\`\`\`

---

## Documentation

| Guide | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| [Getting Started](<readme-to-docs-dir>/getting-started.md) | Installation, setup, first steps |
| [Architecture](<readme-to-docs-dir>/architecture.md) | Project structure and patterns |
| [API Reference](<readme-to-docs-dir>/api.md) | Endpoints, request/response formats |
| [Configuration](<readme-to-docs-dir>/configuration.md) | Environment variables, config files |

## License

MIT (or whatever is in the project)

Key rules for README:

  • Logo/badge line at the top (if project has one)
  • Tagline as blockquote
  • Quick Start with real installation commands (detect from package manager)
  • Key Features as bullet list (3-6 items, scannable)
  • Real usage example that shows the "wow factor"
  • Documentation table with links to the resolved docs directory
  • License at the bottom
  • NO long descriptions, NO full API reference, NO configuration details
2.3: Generate documentation files in the resolved docs directory

For each approved topic, create a doc file:

[← Previous Topic](previous-topic.md) · [Back to README](<docs-to-readme-link>) · [Next Topic →](next-topic.md)

# Topic Title

Content organized by subtopic with headers, code examples, and tables.
Keep each section self-contained.

## See Also

- [Related Topic 1](related-topic.md) — brief description
- [Related Topic 2](other-topic.md) — brief description

Navigation link order follows the Documentation table in README.md (top to bottom). The first doc page omits the "← Previous" link; the last page omits the "Next →" link. Use the correct relative link from the resolved docs directory back to README.md. Example for the default docs/ layout:

getting-started.md:  [Back to README](../README.md) · [Architecture →](architecture.md)
architecture.md:     [← Getting Started](getting-started.md) · [Back to README](../README.md) · [API Reference →](api.md)
api.md:              [← Architecture](architecture.md) · [Back to README](../README.md) · [Configuration →](configuration.md)
configuration.md:    [← API Reference](api.md) · [Back to README](../README.md)

Content guidelines per topic:

getting-started.md:

  • Prerequisites (runtime versions, tools needed)
  • Step-by-step installation
  • First run / quick start
  • Verify it works (expected output)
  • Next steps links

architecture.md:

  • High-level overview (diagram if useful)
  • Directory structure with explanations
  • Key patterns (naming, imports, error handling)
  • Data flow

api.md:

  • Base URL / configuration
  • Authentication
  • Endpoints grouped by resource
  • Request/response examples
  • Error codes

configuration.md:

  • All environment variables with descriptions and defaults
  • Config files and their purpose
  • Feature flags

deployment.md:

  • Build steps
  • Environment setup
  • CI/CD pipeline description
  • Monitoring / health checks

Step 2 (State B): Split Existing README into the resolved docs directory

When README.md exists but is long (150+ lines) and there's no resolved docs directory yet.

2.1: Analyze README structure

Read README.md and identify:

  • Which sections should stay (landing page content)
  • Which sections should move to the resolved docs directory (detailed content)

Stays in README:

  • Title, tagline, badges
  • "Why?" / key features bullet list
  • Quick install (1-3 commands)
  • Brief example
  • Documentation links table
  • External links, license

Moves to the resolved docs directory:

  • Detailed setup instructions → getting-started.md
  • Architecture / project structure → architecture.md
  • Full API reference → api.md
  • Configuration details → configuration.md
  • Contributing guidelines → contributing.md
  • Any section longer than ~30 lines that covers a single topic
2.2: Propose changes to user
Your README.md is [N] lines. I suggest splitting it:

README.md (~100 lines) — keep as landing page:
  ✓ Title + tagline
  ✓ Key features
  ✓ Quick install
  ✓ Example
  ✓ Documentation links table

Move to docs dir:
  → "Installation" section → <resolved docs dir>/getting-started.md
  → "Configuration" section → <resolved docs dir>/configuration.md
  → "API Reference" section → <resolved docs dir>/api.md
  → "Architecture" section → <resolved docs dir>/architecture.md

Proceed?
2.3: Execute the split
  1. Create the resolved docs directory
  2. Create each doc file with content from README + prev/next navigation header (following Documentation table order) + "See Also" footer
  3. Rewrite README as landing page with Documentation links table
  4. Verify no content was lost — every section from old README must exist somewhere

Step 2 (State C): Improve Existing Docs

When both README.md and the resolved docs directory exist.

2.1: Audit current documentation

Check for:

  • README length — is it still a landing page (<150 lines)?
  • Missing topics — are there aspects of the project not documented?
  • Stale content — do docs reference files/APIs that no longer exist?
  • Navigation — do all docs have prev/next header links and "See Also"?
  • Broken links — verify all internal links point to existing files/anchors
  • Consistency — same formatting style across all docs
  • Standards compliance — does existing documentation match the current skill standards? (see 2.1.1)
2.1.1: Standards compliance check

Check existing docs against current Core Principles for gaps (missing navigation, missing "See Also", stale formats). For the full compliance table and auto-fix rules → read references/REVIEW-CHECKLISTS.md (Standards Compliance section).

When gaps are found, include them in the audit report alongside content issues (Step 2.2). Treat them as regular improvements — show the plan and get user approval before applying.

2.2: Propose improvements
Documentation audit results:

✅ README is lean (105 lines)
⚠️  Docs pages in the resolved docs directory are missing prev/next navigation — will add
⚠️  <resolved docs dir>/api.md is missing — project has 12 API endpoints
⚠️  <resolved docs dir>/configuration.md references old env var DB_HOST (now DATABASE_URL)
❌ <resolved docs dir>/getting-started.md links to setup.md which doesn't exist

Proposed fixes:
1. Add prev/next navigation to all doc pages in the resolved docs directory
2. Create <resolved docs dir>/api.md with endpoint reference
3. Update DATABASE_URL in <resolved docs dir>/configuration.md
4. Fix broken link in <resolved docs dir>/getting-started.md

Apply fixes?

Step 3: Generate HTML Version (--web flag)

When --web flag is passed, generate a static HTML site from the markdown docs.

3.1: Create docs-html/ directory
mkdir -p docs-html
3.2: Generate HTML files

For each markdown file (README.md + <resolved docs dir>/*.md), generate an HTML version:

Read the HTML template from templates/html-template.html and use it for each page. Customize: {page_title}, {project_name}, {nav_links}, {content}.

3.3: Convert markdown to HTML

For each doc file: parse markdown → convert to HTML elements → fix .md links to .html → generate nav bar → write to docs-html/.

File mapping: README.md → index.html, <resolved docs dir>/*.md → *.html.

3.4: Output result

Show tree of generated files and open docs-html/index.html hint.

Step 4: Documentation Review

MANDATORY after any content change (generation, split, improvement, file consolidation). Do NOT skip this step.

Skip this step only when "Generate HTML only" was chosen — no content was modified, nothing to review.

Read every generated/modified file and evaluate it against both checklists from references/REVIEW-CHECKLISTS.md. Two checklists: Technical Accuracy and Readability & Completeness.

Fix any issues found before presenting the result to the user. Display results as a compact table with ✅/❌/⚠️ status per item.

Step 4.1: Clean Up Moved Files

Only if files were moved/merged from root into docs/ during Step 1.1.

After the review confirms all content is correctly placed in docs/, offer to delete the original root-level files:

The following root files have been incorporated into docs/:

  CONTRIBUTING.md → now in docs/contributing.md
  ARCHITECTURE.md → now in docs/architecture.md
  DEPLOYMENT.md → now in docs/deployment.md
  SETUP.md → merged into docs/getting-started.md

AskUserQuestion: These originals are no longer needed. Delete them?

Options:
1. Yes, delete all originals
2. Let me pick which ones to delete
3. No, keep them (I'll clean up later)

Based on choice:

  • Yes, delete all → delete all listed originals (see "When deleting" below)
  • Let me pick → present each file individually, delete only approved
  • No, keep them → leave originals in place, continue to Step 5

When deleting:

  1. Verify one more time that the target docs/ file contains all content from the original
  2. Delete the root file
  3. Run git status to show what was deleted — user can restore with git checkout if needed

Do NOT auto-delete. Always ask. The user may want to keep originals temporarily for reference or diff comparison.

Step 5: Update AGENTS.md

After any documentation changes, update the Documentation section in AGENTS.md (if the file exists).

Read AGENTS.md and find the ## Documentation section. Update it to reflect the current state of all documentation files:

## Documentation
| Document | Path | Description |
|----------|------|-------------|
| README | README.md | Project landing page |
| Getting Started | `<resolved docs dir>/getting-started.md` | Installation, setup, first steps |
| Architecture | `<resolved docs dir>/architecture.md` | Project structure and patterns |
| API Reference | `<resolved docs dir>/api.md` | Endpoints, request/response formats |
| Configuration | `<resolved docs dir>/configuration.md` | Environment variables, config files |

Rules:

  • List README.md first, then all doc files in the resolved docs directory in the same order as the README Documentation table
  • If files were moved/merged from root during Step 1.1, reflect the new locations
  • If new doc pages were created, add them
  • If doc pages were removed, remove them
  • Keep descriptions concise (under 10 words)
  • If AGENTS.md doesn't exist, skip this step silently

Context Cleanup

Suggest the user to free up context space if needed: /clear (full reset) or /compact (compress history).

Artifact Ownership

  • Primary ownership: README.md, <resolved docs dir>/*, and the Documentation section in AGENTS.md.
  • Config use: config.yaml resolves paths.description, paths.architecture, paths.docs, language.ui, and language.artifacts.
  • Read-only context: .ai-factory/DESCRIPTION.md, .ai-factory/ARCHITECTURE.md, roadmap/rules/research artifacts unless the user explicitly asks for broader edits.

Important Rules

  1. Always ask before making changes to existing documentation — show the plan first
  2. Never delete content without moving it somewhere else
  3. Detect real project info — don't invent features, read package.json/config files
  4. Use the project's language — if project README is in Russian, write docs in Russian
  5. Preserve existing badges/logos — don't remove them during restructuring
  6. Add to.gitignore if generating HTML: add docs-html/ to.gitignore
  7. Ownership boundary — this command owns documentation artifacts (README.md, <resolved docs dir>/*, and the Documentation section in AGENTS.md), not the roadmap, RULES.md, or research artifacts resolved from config

平台分布

Codex

37.04%
按下载量换算17

Claude

29.24%
按下载量换算13

Cursor

20.62%
按下载量换算9

Gemini CLI

9.9%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills