Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ai-writing-detox(AI 写作排毒)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

ai-writing-detox 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 34,138。

总安装 2,271周安装 91GitHub Stars 171下载 735核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ai-writing-detox(AI 写作排毒)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism
仓库路径:skills/ai-writing-detox
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism --skill ai-writing-detox
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism --skill ai-writing-detox

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于消除 AI 写作中的冗余表达和过度修饰问题。提供禁用词表和替代方案,提升文案可读性和可信度。适合新闻稿、社交媒体内容和官方文档的润色优化。目标是让写作风格隐形,让读者聚焦内容本身。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

ai-writing-detox 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ai-writing-detox

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism --skill ai-w…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ai-writing-detox 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism --skill ai-writing-det…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ai-writing-detox 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ai-writing-detox 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ai-writing-detox 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ai-writing-detox 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,271 次,近一周安装 91 次,下载 735 次,GitHub 171 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ai-writing-detox 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ai-writing-detox

AI 写作排毒 · 本页

2,271171需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

AI writing detox

Good writing is invisible. If readers notice the writing style, it's distracting from the content. AI patterns are noticeable—they break trust.

When to use

  • Writing or editing any journalism content
  • Creating press releases or media advisories
  • Drafting documentation or reports
  • Writing social media posts
  • Reviewing any AI-assisted text before publication

Banned words (delete or replace)

WordWhy it's badAlternative
delveAI signature wordexplore, examine, look at
realmPretentiousarea, field
tapestryPurple prose(delete entirely)
landscapeCorporate speaksituation, environment
leverageJargonuse
utilizeJargonuse
robustMeaninglessstrong, reliable
seamlessAlmost always falsesmooth, easy
comprehensiveRarely necessaryfull, complete
cutting-edgeClichémodern, new
holisticCorporatecomplete, full
synergyCorporate(delete, rewrite)
paradigmOverusedmodel, approach
empowerVague(be specific about what capability)
innovativeEmpty praise(describe what's new)
transformativeHyperbolicchanged, improved
rich(as modifier)(delete or be specific)

Banned phrases

Throat-clearing (delete entirely)

  • "It's important to note that..."
  • "In today's [X] landscape..."
  • "Let's dive/delve into..."
  • "Without further ado..."
  • "In this article, we will..."
  • "It's worth mentioning that..."
  • "It goes without saying..."
  • "As we all know..."

Empty hedges

  • "To be fair..." / "To be honest..."
  • "At the end of the day..."
  • "When it comes to..."
  • "In terms of..."
  • "With respect to..."

AI enthusiasm

  • "This is a game-changer"
  • "...and that's a good thing!"
  • "Here's the thing:"
  • "...and that's okay!"
  • "...and I'm here for it"

Corporate buzzwords

  • "Moving forward..."
  • "Going forward..."
  • "At this point in time..."
  • "Due to the fact that..."
  • "In order to..."

Banned structures

Don't start sentences with:

  • "So," or "Well,"
  • "Now," (when not about time)
  • "Look," or "Listen,"
  • "Basically," or "Essentially,"

Don't end sentences with:

  • "...right?"
  • "...you know?"
  • "...if you will"

The substitution table

If you wroteWrite instead
utilizeuse
facilitatehelp
implementbuild, add, create
leverageuse
functionalityfeature
methodologymethod
in order toto
due to the fact thatbecause
at this point in timenow
a large number ofmany
in the event thatif
prior tobefore
subsequent toafter
in close proximity tonear
has the ability tocan

Case sensitivity

Always use sentence case for headings, not title case.

WrongRight
Getting Started With Your ProjectGetting started with your project
How To Use The ToolHow to use the tool
Best Practices For JournalismBest practices for journalism

Journalism-specific patterns to avoid

"Not just X—it's Y" pattern

❌ "This isn't just a news story—it's a wake-up call" ❌ "This wasn't just a press conference—it was a turning point"

✅ State the thing directly without dramatic framing

"Fundamentally transforms" pattern

❌ "This fundamentally transforms how newsrooms operate" ❌ "This represents a fundamental shift in journalism"

✅ Describe the actual change without hyperbole

Inflated claims in reporting

❌ "A bombshell revelation" ❌ "A major milestone" ❌ "A groundbreaking investigation"

✅ Let the facts speak. Readers judge significance.

Empty transitions

❌ "With that in mind..." ❌ "Building on this foundation..." ❌ "Taking this a step further..."

✅ Just make the next point

Before and after examples

Example 1: General prose

AI slop:

In today's rapidly evolving media landscape, it's crucial to understand the multifaceted nature of AI tools. Let's delve into how these robust solutions can help journalists leverage cutting-edge technology.

Human writing:

AI tools do three things well: drafting, research, and analysis. Here's when to use each.

Example 2: News lede

AI slop:

The city council meeting was a comprehensive and transformative discussion that fundamentally addressed key issues affecting residents in a meaningful way.

Human writing:

The city council voted 5-2 Tuesday to raise property taxes by 3 percent.

Example 3: Feature intro

AI slop:

In the rich tapestry of American journalism, few stories are as compelling as the one about to unfold. This isn't just a profile—it's a journey into the heart of what makes local news truly matter.

Human writing:

Maria Rodriguez has published a newspaper for 47 years. She's never missed an issue.

Example 4: Analysis piece

AI slop:

Moving forward, stakeholders must leverage innovative approaches to navigate the challenging landscape of digital transformation in the journalism ecosystem.

Human writing:

Local papers that want to survive need to find digital revenue. Most haven't.

The verbal tic test

Read your text aloud. Does it sound like:

  • A TED talk introduction? Rewrite.
  • A LinkedIn post? Rewrite.
  • A press release? Rewrite.
  • Corporate communications? Rewrite.
  • How you'd explain it to a colleague? Keep it.

Quick self-check before publishing

Search your text for:

  1. "delve" → delete or replace
  2. "landscape" → delete or replace
  3. "crucial" → is it actually crucial?
  4. "robust" → what does this mean here?
  5. "leverage" → just say "use"
  6. "comprehensive" → is this word doing any work?
  7. Starting "So," → delete

Found any? Your writing needs another pass.

Red flags in technical/analysis writing

  1. Lists of near-synonyms: "comprehensive, sophisticated, and robust" (pick one or none)
  2. Excessive hedging: "may potentially be able to possibly..."
  3. Noun stacking: "production-ready deployment system infrastructure"
  4. Passive voice hiding agency: "It was determined that..." (by whom?)
  5. Circular definitions: "The system enables users to use the functionality"

The ultimate test

Before accepting any AI-assisted text, ask:

  1. Can I delete this word/phrase without losing meaning? → Delete it
  2. Is this the simplest way to say this? → Simplify
  3. Would I say this out loud to a colleague? → If not, rewrite
  4. Does this add information or just sound impressive? → If the latter, cut it

Remember: If readers think "AI wrote this," you've already lost their trust.


*Good writing is invisible. If readers notice the writing, it's getting in the way of the content.*

平台分布

Codex

37.5%
按下载量换算276

Claude

26.1%
按下载量换算192

Cursor

19.96%
按下载量换算147

Gemini CLI

8.13%
按下载量换算60

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills