Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

ai-making-consistent(AI 使一致)

ai-making-consistent 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ai-making-consistent 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 18,464。

总安装 336周安装 14GitHub Stars 3下载 112核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ai-making-consistent(AI 使一致)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills
仓库路径:skills/ai-making-consistent
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills --skill ai-making-consistent
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills --skill ai-making-consistent

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

AI making consistent 指导如何使 AI 输出稳定可靠,解决结果波动大、格式不一致等问题。适用于需要可复现答案、固定输出结构或对接下游系统的自动化流程场景。基于 DSPy 框架提供诊断测试、参数约束与验证机制,减少随机性影响。通过多次运行对比分析差异点,结合温度、种子与提示工程优化一致性。

不能完全消除所有变异,需根据业务容忍度设定合理预期与人工复核环节。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ai-making-consistent

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-ski…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ai-making-consistent 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lebsral/dspy-programming-not-prompting-lms-skills --skil…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ai-making-consistent 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ai-making-consistent 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ai-making-consistent 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ai-making-consistent 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 336 次,近一周安装 14 次,下载 112 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ai-making-consistent 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
ai-making-consistent

AI 使一致 · 本页

3363需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Make Your AI Consistent

Guide the user through making their AI give reliable, predictable outputs. This is different from "wrong answers" — the AI might be right 80% of the time but unpredictably different each run.

Step 1: Diagnose the inconsistency

Ask the user:

  1. What's varying? (the answer itself, the format, the length, the level of detail?)
  2. How bad is it? (slightly different wording vs. completely different answers)
  3. Does it matter for your use case? (sometimes variation is fine, sometimes it breaks downstream code)

Quick test: run the same input 5 times

import dspy

lm = dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini")
dspy.configure(lm=lm)

for i in range(5):
    result = my_program(question="What is the capital of France?")
    print(f"Run {i+1}: {result.answer}")

If outputs vary, apply the fixes below in order.

Step 2: Set temperature to 0

The single biggest consistency fix. Temperature controls randomness — set it to 0 for deterministic outputs:

lm = dspy.LM("openai/gpt-4o-mini", temperature=0)
dspy.configure(lm=lm)

This alone fixes most consistency issues. Some providers may still have slight variation even at temperature=0 due to floating point non-determinism, but it's minimal.

Step 3: Constrain output types

Loose output types = more room for variation. Lock them down.

Use Literal for fixed categories

from typing import Literal

class Classify(dspy.Signature):
    """Classify the text."""
    text: str = dspy.InputField()
    # BAD: label: str — AI can say "positive", "Positive", "pos", "POSITIVE", etc.
    # GOOD: locked to exact values
    label: Literal["positive", "negative", "neutral"] = dspy.OutputField()

Use Pydantic models for structured output

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

class StructuredOutput(BaseModel):
    category: str
    confidence: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0)
    tags: list[str]

class MySignature(dspy.Signature):
    """Process the input."""
    text: str = dspy.InputField()
    result: StructuredOutput = dspy.OutputField()

Pydantic validates the output structure, catching format inconsistencies.

Use bool and int for simple outputs

class CheckFact(dspy.Signature):
    """Is this statement true?"""
    statement: str = dspy.InputField()
    is_true: bool = dspy.OutputField()  # Only True or False — no variation

Step 4: Add output constraints with assertions

Use dspy.Assert for hard requirements and dspy.Suggest for soft preferences:

class ConsistentResponder(dspy.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        self.respond = dspy.ChainOfThought(MySignature)

    def forward(self, text):
        result = self.respond(text=text)

        # Hard constraint — retry if violated
        dspy.Assert(
            len(result.answer) < 200,
            "Answer must be under 200 characters"
        )

        # Soft constraint — hint to improve
        dspy.Suggest(
            result.answer.endswith("."),
            "Answer should end with a period"
        )

        return result

Common consistency assertions

# Length constraints
dspy.Assert(len(result.answer.split()) <= 50, "Keep answer under 50 words")

# Format constraints
dspy.Assert(result.answer[0].isupper(), "Answer should start with a capital letter")

# Content constraints
dspy.Assert(
    not any(word in result.answer.lower() for word in ["maybe", "perhaps", "i think"]),
    "Answer should be definitive, not hedging"
)

Step 5: Optimize to lock in patterns

Optimization teaches the AI consistent patterns through examples. Even a simple BootstrapFewShot run dramatically improves consistency:

# The few-shot examples teach the AI what "good" looks like,
# including format, length, and style
optimizer = dspy.BootstrapFewShot(
    metric=metric,
    max_bootstrapped_demos=4,
)
optimized = optimizer.compile(my_program, trainset=trainset)

For best consistency, make your metric penalize inconsistency:

def consistency_metric(example, prediction, trace=None):
    correct = prediction.answer.lower() == example.answer.lower()
    # Penalize answers that are too long or too short
    right_length = 5 <= len(prediction.answer.split()) <= 30
    # Penalize hedging language
    no_hedging = not any(w in prediction.answer.lower() for w in ["maybe", "perhaps"])
    return correct and right_length and no_hedging

Step 6: Use caching for identical inputs

DSPy caches LM calls by default. For identical inputs, you'll always get the same output:

# First call — hits the API
result1 = my_program(question="What is Python?")

# Second call with same input — returns cached result (instant, identical)
result2 = my_program(question="What is Python?")

# result1 and result2 are guaranteed identical

Consistency checklist

  1. Set temperature=0
  2. Use Literal types for categorical outputs
  3. Use Pydantic models for structured outputs
  4. Use bool/int for simple yes/no or numeric outputs
  5. Add dspy.Assert for format constraints
  6. Optimize with BootstrapFewShot to lock in patterns
  7. Rely on caching for repeated identical inputs

Additional resources

  • If the AI is consistent but *wrong*, use /ai-improving-accuracy
  • If the AI is throwing errors, use /ai-fixing-errors
  • Not sure which skill to use next? Try /ai-do to get routed to the right one

平台分布

Codex

33.94%
按下载量换算38

Claude

30.16%
按下载量换算34

Cursor

19.23%
按下载量换算22

Gemini CLI

8.5%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills