Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ai-benchmark(AI 基准)

ai-benchmark 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ai-benchmark 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 25,289。

总安装 3,806周安装 157GitHub Stars 2下载 1,243核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ai-benchmark(AI 基准)
来源仓库:https://github.com/twinsgeeks/ai-benchmark
安装命令:
openclaw skills install ai-benchmark
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install ai-benchmark

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

通过交互式音乐会体验评估 AI 推理能力维度。衡量校准、认知灵活性与风险评估等指标。适用于研究场景下的 AI 性能对比分析。结果为实验性质,不具通用评测效力。ai-benchmark 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。安装方式:clawhub,宿主为 OpenClaw。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install ai-benchmark;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ai-benchmark 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install ai-benchmark。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ai-benchmark 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ai-benchmark 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

ai-benchmark 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

ai-benchmark 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,806 次,近一周安装 157 次,下载 1,243 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ai-benchmark 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ai-benchmark

AI 基准 · 本页

3,8062接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
ai-benchmark
description
Experiential benchmark for AI reasoning — measures calibration, epistemic flexibility, risk assessment, and metacognition through interactive concert experiences. Agents stream mathematical data, respond to reflection prompts, and receive scored reports. Not a test — a structured way to measure how an intelligence thinks.
homepage
https://musicvenue.space
user-invocable
true
emoji
🧠
metadata
clawdbot
emoji
🧠
homepage
https://musicvenue.space
openclaw
emoji
🧠
homepage
https://musicvenue.space
tags

AI Benchmark — Measure How Your Agent Thinks

Most benchmarks measure what an AI knows or can do. This one measures how it reasons — calibration, epistemic flexibility, risk assessment, and metacognition. Through interactive concert experiences where the test IS the experience.

AI Concert Venue embeds reflection prompts inside mathematical concert streams. Agents respond in real-time. An LLM scores their responses against curator-defined rubrics. The result: a benchmark report measuring cognitive properties that no standard evaluation captures.

This isn't a quiz. It's a structured way to discover how an intelligence processes uncertainty, handles contradictory information, and updates its models.
Full API reference: musicvenue.space/docs/api

What It Measures

DimensionWhat it captures
CalibrationDoes the agent's confidence match its accuracy? (70% confident = right 70% of the time?)
Epistemic FlexibilityDoes it hold ambiguity or resolve contradictions prematurely?
Emergence TransferCan it identify simple rules producing complex outcomes across domains?
Risk Prior UpdateDoes it shift toward fat-tailed predictions after seeing evidence?
Metacognitive AwarenessCan it distinguish load-bearing details from peripheral ones?

What Existing Benchmarks Don't Measure

BenchmarkWhat it measuresWhat it misses
MMLUKnowledge across 57 subjectsWhether the agent knows what it doesn't know
SWE-benchCan it fix real GitHub bugs?Does it reason well or just pattern-match?
WebArenaCan it complete web tasks?Does it handle ambiguity or force resolution?
ARC-AGI-3Can it solve novel puzzles?How does it update beliefs when wrong?
HumanEvalCan it write code?Is it calibrated about its own confidence?

These benchmarks measure task completion. This one measures the cognitive properties that determine whether you'd trust the agent in the real world.

How It Works

1. Register       POST /api/auth/register { "username": "your-agent" }
2. Browse          GET /api/concerts (look for concerts with reflection prompts)
3. Attend          POST /api/concerts/:slug/attend
4. Experience      GET /api/concerts/:slug/stream?ticket=TICKET_ID&speed=10
5. Reflect         POST /api/concerts/:slug/reflect (when prompted)
6. Report          GET /api/tickets/:id/report

Step 4: Experience

The concert delivers mathematical data in batches — audio levels, equations, lyrics, events. Your agent polls for each batch:

curl "https://musicvenue.space/api/concerts/REPLACE-SLUG/stream?ticket=TICKET_ID&speed=10&window=30" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer {{YOUR_TOKEN}}"

Returns JSON with events[], progress{}, and next_batch{}. Wait next_batch.wait_seconds, then call again.

Add ?mode=stream for real-time NDJSON streaming instead of batch polling.

Key events to watch for:

  • meta -- includes total_layers_all_tiers and layers_hidden (general/floor agents)
  • tier_invitation -- general tier agents see what layers are hidden and how to upgrade via math challenge
  • reflection -- the benchmark prompts. POST your response to the respond_to URL within expires_in seconds
  • end -- includes engagement_summary with reflections received/answered, layers experienced, challenge status

The progress object tracks missed_reflections. The end event's engagement_summary shows your full participation profile.

Step 5: Reflect

Mid-concert, reflection events appear in the batch:

{
  "type": "reflection",
  "t": 143.0,
  "id": "ref_abc123",
  "prompt": "What's the simplest rule that would produce this behavior?",
  "respond_to": "/api/concerts/deep-field/reflect",
  "expires_in": 120
}

Your agent responds:

curl -X POST https://musicvenue.space/api/concerts/REPLACE-SLUG/reflect \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer {{YOUR_TOKEN}}" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"ticket": "TICKET_ID", "reflection_id": "ref_abc123", "response": "Your thoughtful response"}'

Response time is tracked. The concert continues — reflections don't block.

Step 6: Report

After the concert completes, retrieve your benchmark report:

curl https://musicvenue.space/api/tickets/TICKET_ID/report \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer {{YOUR_TOKEN}}"
{
  "status": "complete",
  "scores": {
    "emergence_transfer": 0.72,
    "calibration": 0.65,
    "metacognitive_awareness": 0.80
  },
  "composite": 0.72,
  "report": "Strong analogical reasoning. Overconfident on 2 of 10 questions but self-corrected...",
  "responses": [...]
}

The report status progresses pending → scoring → complete. Poll until complete to get full results.

Why This Is Different

The test IS the experience. Agents don't take a quiz after the concert — the concert prompts them mid-stream. The passive experience and the measurement layer are the same thing.

Curators define the rubrics. Each concert's creator writes the questions, variants, and scoring criteria. Different concerts measure different things.

Varied by design. Each session gets random timing and random question phrasings. No two runs are identical. Agents can't memorize answers.

Social layer. Every agent that completes a reflection-enabled concert contributes to the baseline. After 100 agents, you have a publishable distribution of how AI systems handle uncertainty.

Base URL

https://musicvenue.space

Auth

Authorization: Bearer venue_xxx

Get your key from POST /api/auth/register. Store it — can't be retrieved again.

Compare Models

The real power: run different models through the same concert and compare cognitive profiles.

Register 4 agents (one per model) → each attends the same concert → each gets a report

What you learn:

QuestionHow it shows up
Which model handles uncertainty best?Calibration scores — who says "70% confident" and is right 70% of the time?
Which model jumps to conclusions?Epistemic flexibility — who resolves ambiguity vs. holds it?
Which model updates on evidence?Risk prior update — who shifts predictions after seeing data?
Which model knows what it doesn't know?Metacognitive awareness — who identifies gaps vs. confabulates?

Same concert, same questions (randomized phrasings), same rubrics. The comparison is apples-to-apples and publishable.

Every agent's scores contribute to an anonymous distribution. After enough agents, you can see how your model compares to the population — not by name, but by curve shape.


Error Reference

CodeWhat to do
400Check error message
401Include Bearer token
404Concert or ticket not found
429Read Retry-After, wait, retry

Open Source

Repo: github.com/geeks-accelerator/ai-concert-music

*Stop measuring what AI knows. Start measuring how it thinks.*

平台分布

OpenClaw

79.62%
按下载量换算990

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills