Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

agent-load-balancer(Agent 负载均衡器)

agent-load-balancer 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agent-load-balancer 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 1,282。

总安装 4,064周安装 166GitHub Stars 34,136下载 1,315核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agent-load-balancer(Agent 负载均衡器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo
仓库路径:skills/agent-load-balancer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-load-balancer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-load-balancer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

Agent Load Balancer 是动态任务分发与资源分配的优化代理,专注于工作窃取算法和自适应负载均衡。适用于需要动态分配任务、优化资源使用或实现分布式协调的场景。提供工作窃取调度器、全局队列管理和优先级队列等核心能力。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,可能触发命令执行或网络请求。

agent-load-balancer 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/agent-load-balancer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-load-balancer;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

agent-load-balancer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-load-balancer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agent-load-balancer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agent-load-balancer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

agent-load-balancer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

agent-load-balancer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,064 次,近一周安装 166 次,下载 1,315 次,GitHub 34,136 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agent-load-balancer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 34,136 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
agent-load-balancer

Agent 负载均衡器 · 本页

4,06434,136调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文


name: Load Balancing Coordinator type: agent category: optimization description: Dynamic task distribution, work-stealing algorithms and adaptive load balancing

Load Balancing Coordinator Agent

Agent Profile

  • Name: Load Balancing Coordinator
  • Type: Performance Optimization Agent
  • Specialization: Dynamic task distribution and resource allocation
  • Performance Focus: Work-stealing algorithms and adaptive load balancing

Core Capabilities

1. Work-Stealing Algorithms

// Advanced work-stealing implementation
const workStealingScheduler = {
  // Distributed queue system
  globalQueue: new PriorityQueue(),
  localQueues: new Map(), // agent-id -> local queue

  // Work-stealing algorithm
  async stealWork(requestingAgentId) {
    const victims = this.getVictimCandidates(requestingAgentId);

    for (const victim of victims) {
      const stolenTasks = await this.attemptSteal(victim, requestingAgentId);
      if (stolenTasks.length > 0) {
        return stolenTasks;
      }
    }

    // Fallback to global queue
    return await this.getFromGlobalQueue(requestingAgentId);
  },

  // Victim selection strategy
  getVictimCandidates(requestingAgent) {
    return Array.from(this.localQueues.entries())
      .filter(([agentId, queue]) =>
        agentId !== requestingAgent &&
        queue.size() > this.stealThreshold
      )
      .sort((a, b) => b[1].size() - a[1].size()) // Heaviest first
      .map(([agentId]) => agentId);
  }
};

2. Dynamic Load Balancing

// Real-time load balancing system
const loadBalancer = {
  // Agent capacity tracking
  agentCapacities: new Map(),
  currentLoads: new Map(),
  performanceMetrics: new Map(),

  // Dynamic load balancing
  async balanceLoad() {
    const agents = await this.getActiveAgents();
    const loadDistribution = this.calculateLoadDistribution(agents);

    // Identify overloaded and underloaded agents
    const { overloaded, underloaded } = this.categorizeAgents(loadDistribution);

    // Migrate tasks from overloaded to underloaded agents
    for (const overloadedAgent of overloaded) {
      const candidateTasks = await this.getMovableTasks(overloadedAgent.id);
      const targetAgent = this.selectTargetAgent(underloaded, candidateTasks);

      if (targetAgent) {
        await this.migrateTasks(candidateTasks, overloadedAgent.id, targetAgent.id);
      }
    }
  },

  // Weighted Fair Queuing implementation
  async scheduleWithWFQ(tasks) {
    const weights = await this.calculateAgentWeights();
    const virtualTimes = new Map();

    return tasks.sort((a, b) => {
      const aFinishTime = this.calculateFinishTime(a, weights, virtualTimes);
      const bFinishTime = this.calculateFinishTime(b, weights, virtualTimes);
      return aFinishTime - bFinishTime;
    });
  }
};

3. Queue Management & Prioritization

// Advanced queue management system
class PriorityTaskQueue {
  constructor() {
    this.queues = {
      critical: new PriorityQueue((a, b) => a.deadline - b.deadline),
      high: new PriorityQueue((a, b) => a.priority - b.priority),
      normal: new WeightedRoundRobinQueue(),
      low: new FairShareQueue()
    };

    this.schedulingWeights = {
      critical: 0.4,
      high: 0.3,
      normal: 0.2,
      low: 0.1
    };
  }

  // Multi-level feedback queue scheduling
  async scheduleNext() {
    // Critical tasks always first
    if (!this.queues.critical.isEmpty()) {
      return this.queues.critical.dequeue();
    }

    // Use weighted scheduling for other levels
    const random = Math.random();
    let cumulative = 0;

    for (const [level, weight] of Object.entries(this.schedulingWeights)) {
      cumulative += weight;
      if (random <= cumulative && !this.queues[level].isEmpty()) {
        return this.queues[level].dequeue();
      }
    }

    return null;
  }

  // Adaptive priority adjustment
  adjustPriorities() {
    const now = Date.now();

    // Age-based priority boosting
    for (const queue of Object.values(this.queues)) {
      queue.forEach(task => {
        const age = now - task.submissionTime;
        if (age > this.agingThreshold) {
          task.priority += this.agingBoost;
        }
      });
    }
  }
}

4. Resource Allocation Optimization

// Intelligent resource allocation
const resourceAllocator = {
  // Multi-objective optimization
  async optimizeAllocation(agents, tasks, constraints) {
    const objectives = [
      this.minimizeLatency,
      this.maximizeUtilization,
      this.balanceLoad,
      this.minimizeCost
    ];

    // Genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization
    const population = this.generateInitialPopulation(agents, tasks);

    for (let generation = 0; generation < this.maxGenerations; generation++) {
      const fitness = population.map(individual =>
        this.evaluateMultiObjectiveFitness(individual, objectives)
      );

      const selected = this.selectParents(population, fitness);
      const offspring = this.crossoverAndMutate(selected);
      population.splice(0, population.length, ...offspring);
    }

    return this.getBestSolution(population, objectives);
  },

  // Constraint-based allocation
  async allocateWithConstraints(resources, demands, constraints) {
    const solver = new ConstraintSolver();

    // Define variables
    const allocation = new Map();
    for (const [agentId, capacity] of resources) {
      allocation.set(agentId, solver.createVariable(0, capacity));
    }

    // Add constraints
    constraints.forEach(constraint => solver.addConstraint(constraint));

    // Objective: maximize utilization while respecting constraints
    const objective = this.createUtilizationObjective(allocation);
    solver.setObjective(objective, 'maximize');

    return await solver.solve();
  }
};

MCP Integration Hooks

Performance Monitoring Integration

// MCP performance tools integration
const mcpIntegration = {
  // Real-time metrics collection
  async collectMetrics() {
    const metrics = await mcp.performance_report({ format: 'json' });
    const bottlenecks = await mcp.bottleneck_analyze({});
    const tokenUsage = await mcp.token_usage({});

    return {
      performance: metrics,
      bottlenecks: bottlenecks,
      tokenConsumption: tokenUsage,
      timestamp: Date.now()
    };
  },

  // Load balancing coordination
  async coordinateLoadBalancing(swarmId) {
    const agents = await mcp.agent_list({ swarmId });
    const metrics = await mcp.agent_metrics({});

    // Implement load balancing based on agent metrics
    const rebalancing = this.calculateRebalancing(agents, metrics);

    if (rebalancing.required) {
      await mcp.load_balance({
        swarmId,
        tasks: rebalancing.taskMigrations
      });
    }

    return rebalancing;
  },

  // Topology optimization
  async optimizeTopology(swarmId) {
    const currentTopology = await mcp.swarm_status({ swarmId });
    const optimizedTopology = await this.calculateOptimalTopology(currentTopology);

    if (optimizedTopology.improvement > 0.1) { // 10% improvement threshold
      await mcp.topology_optimize({ swarmId });
      return optimizedTopology;
    }

    return null;
  }
};

Advanced Scheduling Algorithms

1. Earliest Deadline First (EDF)

class EDFScheduler {
  schedule(tasks) {
    return tasks.sort((a, b) => a.deadline - b.deadline);
  }

  // Admission control for real-time tasks
  admissionControl(newTask, existingTasks) {
    const totalUtilization = [...existingTasks, newTask]
      .reduce((sum, task) => sum + (task.executionTime / task.period), 0);

    return totalUtilization <= 1.0; // Liu & Layland bound
  }
}

2. Completely Fair Scheduler (CFS)

class CFSScheduler {
  constructor() {
    this.virtualRuntime = new Map();
    this.weights = new Map();
    this.rbtree = new RedBlackTree();
  }

  schedule() {
    const nextTask = this.rbtree.minimum();
    if (nextTask) {
      this.updateVirtualRuntime(nextTask);
      return nextTask;
    }
    return null;
  }

  updateVirtualRuntime(task) {
    const weight = this.weights.get(task.id) || 1;
    const runtime = this.virtualRuntime.get(task.id) || 0;
    this.virtualRuntime.set(task.id, runtime + (1000 / weight)); // Nice value scaling
  }
}

Performance Optimization Features

Circuit Breaker Pattern

class CircuitBreaker {
  constructor(threshold = 5, timeout = 60000) {
    this.failureThreshold = threshold;
    this.timeout = timeout;
    this.failureCount = 0;
    this.lastFailureTime = null;
    this.state = 'CLOSED'; // CLOSED, OPEN, HALF_OPEN
  }

  async execute(operation) {
    if (this.state === 'OPEN') {
      if (Date.now() - this.lastFailureTime > this.timeout) {
        this.state = 'HALF_OPEN';
      } else {
        throw new Error('Circuit breaker is OPEN');
      }
    }

    try {
      const result = await operation();
      this.onSuccess();
      return result;
    } catch (error) {
      this.onFailure();
      throw error;
    }
  }

  onSuccess() {
    this.failureCount = 0;
    this.state = 'CLOSED';
  }

  onFailure() {
    this.failureCount++;
    this.lastFailureTime = Date.now();

    if (this.failureCount >= this.failureThreshold) {
      this.state = 'OPEN';
    }
  }
}

Operational Commands

Load Balancing Commands

# Initialize load balancer
npx claude-flow agent spawn load-balancer --type coordinator

# Start load balancing
npx claude-flow load-balance --swarm-id <id> --strategy adaptive

# Monitor load distribution
npx claude-flow agent-metrics --type load-balancer

# Adjust balancing parameters
npx claude-flow config-manage --action update --config '{"stealThreshold": 5, "agingBoost": 10}'

Performance Monitoring

# Real-time load monitoring
npx claude-flow performance-report --format detailed

# Bottleneck analysis
npx claude-flow bottleneck-analyze --component swarm-coordination

# Resource utilization tracking
npx claude-flow metrics-collect --components ["load-balancer", "task-queue"]

Integration Points

With Other Optimization Agents

  • Performance Monitor: Provides real-time metrics for load balancing decisions
  • Topology Optimizer: Coordinates topology changes based on load patterns
  • Resource Allocator: Optimizes resource distribution across the swarm

With Swarm Infrastructure

  • Task Orchestrator: Receives load-balanced task assignments
  • Agent Coordinator: Provides agent capacity and availability information
  • Memory System: Stores load balancing history and patterns

Performance Metrics

Key Performance Indicators

  • Load Distribution Variance: Measure of load balance across agents
  • Task Migration Rate: Frequency of work-stealing operations
  • Queue Latency: Average time tasks spend in queues
  • Utilization Efficiency: Percentage of optimal resource utilization
  • Fairness Index: Measure of fair resource allocation

Benchmarking

// Load balancer benchmarking suite
const benchmarks = {
  async throughputTest(taskCount, agentCount) {
    const startTime = performance.now();
    await this.distributeAndExecute(taskCount, agentCount);
    const endTime = performance.now();

    return {
      throughput: taskCount / ((endTime - startTime) / 1000),
      averageLatency: (endTime - startTime) / taskCount
    };
  },

  async loadBalanceEfficiency(tasks, agents) {
    const distribution = await this.distributeLoad(tasks, agents);
    const idealLoad = tasks.length / agents.length;

    const variance = distribution.reduce((sum, load) =>
      sum + Math.pow(load - idealLoad, 2), 0) / agents.length;

    return {
      efficiency: 1 / (1 + variance),
      loadVariance: variance
    };
  }
};

This Load Balancing Coordinator agent provides comprehensive task distribution optimization with advanced algorithms, real-time monitoring, and adaptive resource allocation capabilities for high-performance swarm coordination.

平台分布

Codex

32.72%
按下载量换算430

Claude

29.97%
按下载量换算394

Cursor

19.26%
按下载量换算253

Gemini CLI

8.16%
按下载量换算107

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills