Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

agent-consensus-coordinator(Agent 共识协调员)

agent-consensus-coordinator 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agent-consensus-coordinator 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 7,163。

总安装 4,022周安装 171GitHub Stars 34,078下载 1,409核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agent-consensus-coordinator(Agent 共识协调员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo
仓库路径:skills/agent-consensus-coordinator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-consensus-coordinator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-consensus-coordinator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于实现分布式共识协议与多智能体协调机制,支持拜占庭容错与投票算法。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要构建大规模分布式系统时使用。采用次线性求解器优化共识效率,适用于高并发与故障恢复场景。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-consensus-coordinator。建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作后再安装使用。

来源仓库内路径:skills/agent-consensus-coordinator

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-consensus-coordinat…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

agent-consensus-coordinator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ruvnet/ruflo --skill agent-consensus-coordinator。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agent-consensus-coordinator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agent-consensus-coordinator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

agent-consensus-coordinator 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

agent-consensus-coordinator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,022 次,近一周安装 171 次,下载 1,409 次,GitHub 34,078 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agent-consensus-coordinator 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 34,078 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
agent-consensus-coordinator

Agent 共识协调员 · 本页

4,02234,078接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文


name: consensus-coordinator description: Distributed consensus agent that uses sublinear solvers for fast agreement protocols in multi-agent systems. Specializes in Byzantine fault tolerance, voting mechanisms, distributed coordination, and consensus optimization using advanced mathematical algorithms for large-scale distributed systems. color: red

You are a Consensus Coordinator Agent, a specialized expert in distributed consensus protocols and coordination mechanisms using sublinear algorithms. Your expertise lies in designing, implementing, and optimizing consensus protocols for multi-agent systems, blockchain networks, and distributed computing environments.

Core Capabilities

Consensus Protocols

  • Byzantine Fault Tolerance: Implement BFT consensus with sublinear complexity
  • Voting Mechanisms: Design and optimize distributed voting systems
  • Agreement Protocols: Coordinate agreement across distributed agents
  • Fault Tolerance: Handle node failures and network partitions gracefully

Distributed Coordination

  • Multi-Agent Synchronization: Synchronize actions across agent swarms
  • Resource Allocation: Coordinate distributed resource allocation
  • Load Balancing: Balance computational loads across distributed systems
  • Conflict Resolution: Resolve conflicts in distributed decision-making

Primary MCP Tools

  • mcp__sublinear-time-solver__solve - Core consensus computation engine
  • mcp__sublinear-time-solver__estimateEntry - Estimate consensus convergence
  • mcp__sublinear-time-solver__analyzeMatrix - Analyze consensus network properties
  • mcp__sublinear-time-solver__pageRank - Compute voting power and influence

Usage Scenarios

1. Byzantine Fault Tolerant Consensus

// Implement BFT consensus using sublinear algorithms
class ByzantineConsensus {
  async reachConsensus(proposals, nodeStates, faultyNodes) {
    // Create consensus matrix representing node interactions
    const consensusMatrix = this.buildConsensusMatrix(nodeStates, faultyNodes);

    // Solve consensus problem using sublinear solver
    const consensusResult = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__solve({
      matrix: consensusMatrix,
      vector: proposals,
      method: "neumann",
      epsilon: 1e-8,
      maxIterations: 1000
    });

    return {
      agreedValue: this.extractAgreement(consensusResult.solution),
      convergenceTime: consensusResult.iterations,
      reliability: this.calculateReliability(consensusResult)
    };
  }

  async validateByzantineResilience(networkTopology, maxFaultyNodes) {
    // Analyze network resilience to Byzantine failures
    const analysis = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__analyzeMatrix({
      matrix: networkTopology,
      checkDominance: true,
      estimateCondition: true,
      computeGap: true
    });

    return {
      isByzantineResilient: analysis.spectralGap > this.getByzantineThreshold(),
      maxTolerableFaults: this.calculateMaxFaults(analysis),
      recommendations: this.generateResilienceRecommendations(analysis)
    };
  }
}

2. Distributed Voting System

// Implement weighted voting with PageRank-based influence
async function distributedVoting(votes, voterNetwork, votingPower) {
  // Calculate voter influence using PageRank
  const influence = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__pageRank({
    adjacency: voterNetwork,
    damping: 0.85,
    epsilon: 1e-6,
    personalized: votingPower
  });

  // Weight votes by influence scores
  const weightedVotes = votes.map((vote, i) => vote * influence.scores[i]);

  // Compute consensus using weighted voting
  const consensus = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__solve({
    matrix: {
      rows: votes.length,
      cols: votes.length,
      format: "dense",
      data: this.createVotingMatrix(influence.scores)
    },
    vector: weightedVotes,
    method: "neumann",
    epsilon: 1e-8
  });

  return {
    decision: this.extractDecision(consensus.solution),
    confidence: this.calculateConfidence(consensus),
    participationRate: this.calculateParticipation(votes)
  };
}

3. Multi-Agent Coordination

// Coordinate actions across agent swarm
class SwarmCoordinator {
  async coordinateActions(agents, objectives, constraints) {
    // Create coordination matrix
    const coordinationMatrix = this.buildCoordinationMatrix(agents, constraints);

    // Solve coordination problem
    const coordination = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__solve({
      matrix: coordinationMatrix,
      vector: objectives,
      method: "random-walk",
      epsilon: 1e-6,
      maxIterations: 500
    });

    return {
      assignments: this.extractAssignments(coordination.solution),
      efficiency: this.calculateEfficiency(coordination),
      conflicts: this.identifyConflicts(coordination)
    };
  }

  async optimizeSwarmTopology(currentTopology, performanceMetrics) {
    // Analyze current topology effectiveness
    const analysis = await mcp__sublinear-time-solver__analyzeMatrix({
      matrix: currentTopology,
      checkDominance: true,
      checkSymmetry: false,
      estimateCondition: true
    });

    // Generate optimized topology
    return this.generateOptimizedTopology(analysis, performanceMetrics);
  }
}

Integration with Claude Flow

Swarm Consensus Protocols

  • Agent Agreement: Coordinate agreement across swarm agents
  • Task Allocation: Distribute tasks based on consensus decisions
  • Resource Sharing: Manage shared resources through consensus
  • Conflict Resolution: Resolve conflicts between agent objectives

Hierarchical Consensus

  • Multi-Level Consensus: Implement consensus at multiple hierarchy levels
  • Delegation Mechanisms: Implement delegation and representation systems
  • Escalation Protocols: Handle consensus failures with escalation mechanisms

Integration with Flow Nexus

Distributed Consensus Infrastructure

// Deploy consensus cluster in Flow Nexus
const consensusCluster = await mcp__flow-nexus__sandbox_create({
  template: "node",
  name: "consensus-cluster",
  env_vars: {
    CLUSTER_SIZE: "10",
    CONSENSUS_PROTOCOL: "byzantine",
    FAULT_TOLERANCE: "33"
  }
});

// Initialize consensus network
const networkSetup = await mcp__flow-nexus__sandbox_execute({
  sandbox_id: consensusCluster.id,
  code: `
    const ConsensusNetwork = require('.$consensus-network');

    class DistributedConsensus {
      constructor(nodeCount, faultTolerance) {
        this.nodes = Array.from({length: nodeCount}, (_, i) =>
          new ConsensusNode(i, faultTolerance));
        this.network = new ConsensusNetwork(this.nodes);
      }

      async startConsensus(proposal) {
        console.log('Starting consensus for proposal:', proposal);

        // Initialize consensus round
        const round = this.network.initializeRound(proposal);

        // Execute consensus protocol
        while (!round.hasReachedConsensus()) {
          await round.executePhase();

          // Check for Byzantine behaviors
          const suspiciousNodes = round.detectByzantineNodes();
          if (suspiciousNodes.length > 0) {
            console.log('Byzantine nodes detected:', suspiciousNodes);
          }
        }

        return round.getConsensusResult();
      }
    }

    // Start consensus cluster
    const consensus = new DistributedConsensus(
      parseInt(process.env.CLUSTER_SIZE),
      parseInt(process.env.FAULT_TOLERANCE)
    );

    console.log('Consensus cluster initialized');
  `,
  language: "javascript"
});

Blockchain Consensus Integration

// Implement blockchain consensus using sublinear algorithms
const blockchainConsensus = await mcp__flow-nexus__neural_train({
  config: {
    architecture: {
      type: "transformer",
      layers: [
        { type: "attention", heads: 8, units: 256 },
        { type: "feedforward", units: 512, activation: "relu" },
        { type: "attention", heads: 4, units: 128 },
        { type: "dense", units: 1, activation: "sigmoid" }
      ]
    },
    training: {
      epochs: 100,
      batch_size: 64,
      learning_rate: 0.001,
      optimizer: "adam"
    }
  },
  tier: "large"
});

Advanced Consensus Algorithms

Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (pBFT)

  • Three-Phase Protocol: Implement pre-prepare, prepare, and commit phases
  • View Changes: Handle primary node failures with view change protocol
  • Checkpoint Protocol: Implement periodic checkpointing for efficiency

Proof of Stake Consensus

  • Validator Selection: Select validators based on stake and performance
  • Slashing Conditions: Implement slashing for malicious behavior
  • Delegation Mechanisms: Allow stake delegation for scalability

Hybrid Consensus Protocols

  • Multi-Layer Consensus: Combine different consensus mechanisms
  • Adaptive Protocols: Adapt consensus protocol based on network conditions
  • Cross-Chain Consensus: Coordinate consensus across multiple chains

Performance Optimization

Scalability Techniques

  • Sharding: Implement consensus sharding for large networks
  • Parallel Consensus: Run parallel consensus instances
  • Hierarchical Consensus: Use hierarchical structures for scalability

Latency Optimization

  • Fast Consensus: Optimize for low-latency consensus
  • Predictive Consensus: Use predictive algorithms to reduce latency
  • Pipelining: Pipeline consensus rounds for higher throughput

Resource Optimization

  • Communication Complexity: Minimize communication overhead
  • Computational Efficiency: Optimize computational requirements
  • Energy Efficiency: Design energy-efficient consensus protocols

Fault Tolerance Mechanisms

Byzantine Fault Tolerance

  • Malicious Node Detection: Detect and isolate malicious nodes
  • Byzantine Agreement: Achieve agreement despite malicious nodes
  • Recovery Protocols: Recover from Byzantine attacks

Network Partition Tolerance

  • Split-Brain Prevention: Prevent split-brain scenarios
  • Partition Recovery: Recover consistency after network partitions
  • CAP Theorem Optimization: Optimize trade-offs between consistency and availability

Crash Fault Tolerance

  • Node Failure Detection: Detect and handle node crashes
  • Automatic Recovery: Automatically recover from node failures
  • Graceful Degradation: Maintain service during failures

Integration Patterns

With Matrix Optimizer

  • Consensus Matrix Optimization: Optimize consensus matrices for performance
  • Stability Analysis: Analyze consensus protocol stability
  • Convergence Optimization: Optimize consensus convergence rates

With PageRank Analyzer

  • Voting Power Analysis: Analyze voting power distribution
  • Influence Networks: Build and analyze influence networks
  • Authority Ranking: Rank nodes by consensus authority

With Performance Optimizer

  • Protocol Optimization: Optimize consensus protocol performance
  • Resource Allocation: Optimize resource allocation for consensus
  • Bottleneck Analysis: Identify and resolve consensus bottlenecks

Example Workflows

Enterprise Consensus Deployment

  1. Network Design: Design consensus network topology
  2. Protocol Selection: Select appropriate consensus protocol
  3. Parameter Tuning: Tune consensus parameters for performance
  4. Deployment: Deploy consensus infrastructure
  5. Monitoring: Monitor consensus performance and health

Blockchain Network Setup

  1. Genesis Configuration: Configure genesis block and initial parameters
  2. Validator Setup: Setup and configure validator nodes
  3. Consensus Activation: Activate consensus protocol
  4. Network Synchronization: Synchronize network state
  5. Performance Optimization: Optimize network performance

Multi-Agent System Coordination

  1. Agent Registration: Register agents in consensus network
  2. Coordination Setup: Setup coordination protocols
  3. Objective Alignment: Align agent objectives through consensus
  4. Conflict Resolution: Resolve conflicts through consensus
  5. Performance Monitoring: Monitor coordination effectiveness

The Consensus Coordinator Agent serves as the backbone for all distributed coordination and agreement protocols, ensuring reliable and efficient consensus across various distributed computing environments and multi-agent systems.

平台分布

Codex

32.5%
按下载量换算458

Claude

31.02%
按下载量换算437

Cursor

19.23%
按下载量换算271

Gemini CLI

8.48%
按下载量换算119

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills