Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

agent-architect-zurbrick(Agent 建筑师祖布里克)

agent-architect-zurbrick 用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和凭据风险排查,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要复核安全边界、认证流程或敏感配置时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agent-architect-zurbrick 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 11,500。

总安装 4,568周安装 183GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,479核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agent-architect-zurbrick(Agent 建筑师祖布里克)
来源仓库:https://github.com/zurbrick/agent-architect-zurbrick
安装命令:
openclaw skills install agent-architect-zurbrick
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install agent-architect-zurbrick

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

从角色语气到底层架构全面审核代理配置合理性。agent-architect-zurbrick 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适用于重构代理结构或优化多代理协作关系的场景。提供宪法规则、内存架构与技能组合的专业改进建议。输出仅为参考意见,重大变更前应充分测试回滚方案。

需确保拥有足够权限访问所有相关配置文件与运行时状态。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install agent-architect-zurbrick;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

agent-architect-zurbrick 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install agent-architect-zurbrick。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agent-architect-zurbrick 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agent-architect-zurbrick 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

agent-architect-zurbrick 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

agent-architect-zurbrick 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,568 次,近一周安装 183 次,下载 1,479 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agent-architect-zurbrick 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
agent-architect-zurbrick

Agent 建筑师祖布里克 · 本页

4,568—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
agent-architect
description
>

Agent Architect

Use this skill to diagnose where an agent problem belongs before changing anything.

This is a narrow architecture audit skill. It does not run a governance program, build a dashboard, or redesign the whole agent unless the evidence clearly earns that conclusion.

Recommendations from this skill are diagnostic only. Do not apply patches without reviewing whether the lane assignment and fix type actually match the problem.

Use when

  • an agent sounds wrong, acts off-brand, or drifts in tone
  • an agent keeps making the same operating mistake
  • an agent forgets key context, commitments, or prior corrections
  • an agent keeps solving repeatable problems ad hoc instead of through a skill or workflow
  • the real question is which layer should change rather than how to patch the symptom
  • deciding whether the fix belongs in SOUL.md, AGENTS.md / operations files,

memory files, or a skill directory

Do not use when

  • the user already knows the exact file and exact edit to make
  • the task is routine skill authoring with no architecture diagnosis needed
  • the request is to build a whole new agent system, dashboard, registry, or governance framework
  • the issue is a one-off execution failure better solved by fixing the local task directly
  • there is not enough evidence yet to distinguish signal from a single bad run

The four lanes

  1. Persona / tone — identity, voice, style, stance, response texture
  2. Rules — constitutional constraints, operating rules, decision protocols,

escalation boundaries, workflow habits

  1. Memory — what is stored, when it is written, how it is retrieved,

where durable facts vs daily state live

  1. Skills — reusable workflows, narrow procedural packages, tool-routing,

repeatable playbooks

Read references/lane-diagnosis.md before assigning a lane.

Default workflow

  1. Start from the symptom, not the fix

Capture the failure pattern, repeated friction, or observed weakness.

  1. Check whether this is recurring or isolated

If it is a one-off, prefer a local fix or no change.

  1. Assign the primary lane

Read references/lane-diagnosis.md and choose the lane causing the failure. If multiple lanes contribute, name one primary lane and at most one secondary lane. Only recommend a secondary-lane patch if the primary-lane fix would clearly fail without it. Otherwise, note the secondary lane as context only.

  1. Choose the smallest justified fix type

Read references/fix-types.md and prefer, in order: - no change - plain edit - memory tweak - rule change - skill change

Do not escalate to a larger fix just because it feels more architectural. Weak evidence should bias toward no change or a local edit. Structural changes need recurrence, cross-context benefit, or repeated operator friction.

  1. Say where the patch belongs

Point to the layer or file family directly: - persona → SOUL.md, identity/tone docs - rules → AGENTS.md, OPERATIONS.md, guardrails, QA/protocol docs - memory → MEMORY.md, memory/*.md, memory procedures, retrieval paths - skills → a specific skill's SKILL.md, references/, or a new narrow skill only if earned

  1. State what not to touch

Avoid collateral edits, broad rewrites, and cross-lane churn unless clearly necessary.

  1. Use the output format exactly

Keep the answer short, decisive, and patch-oriented.

  1. Log meaningful architecture recommendations

If the diagnosis leads to a real structural recommendation, log the lane, fix type, and short symptom summary to daily memory so future audits can see what changed and why.

For a fast pass before recommending any change, read references/audit-checklist.md.

Output format

Human-readable

  1. Diagnosis — what is actually going wrong
  2. Lane — persona / rules / memory / skills
  3. Recommended fix type — plain edit / rule change / skill change / memory tweak / no change
  4. Smallest justified patch — exact change and where it belongs
  5. Risks / what not to touch — nearby changes that would be overreach

Structured option

diagnosis: short summary of what is actually wrong
lane: persona|rules|memory|skills
secondary_lane: none|persona|rules|memory|skills
fix_type: no_change|plain_edit|memory_tweak|rule_change|skill_change
patch_target: exact file or file family
smallest_patch: concise patch recommendation
risks:
  - overreach to avoid
  - adjacent file or lane not to touch

Works well with

  • skill-builder — when the result is "tighten or add a narrow skill"
  • memory-architecture skills such as cognition — when the issue is durable storage, retrieval shape, or memory-system design beyond a local tweak
  • battle-tested-agent — when the diagnosis suggests reliability hardening patterns across memory, delegation, or verification
  • openclaw-guide — when the issue is really OpenClaw routing, config, session behavior, or platform mechanics rather than the agent itself

References

  • references/lane-diagnosis.md — how to identify the weak lane and avoid misclassification
  • references/fix-types.md — how to choose the smallest justified intervention
  • references/audit-checklist.md — fast audit pass before recommending any patch
  • references/placement-map.md — where each kind of fix usually belongs
  • references/worked-examples.md — compact examples for common mixed-lane failures and one do-nothing case

Output style

Be crisp. Route the problem to the right layer. Prefer the smallest justified patch over architectural theater.

平台分布

OpenClaw

72.87%
按下载量换算1,078

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills