Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-serviceclawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

agent-api-stability-sentinelAgent API stability sentinel 搜索

Agent Skill

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

总安装

6,928

周安装

283

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,241
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agent-api-stability-sentinel(Agent API stability sentinel 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nntrivi2001/agent-api-stability-sentinel
安装命令:
openclaw skills install agent-api-stability-sentinel
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install agent-api-stability-sentinel

简介

检测 API 接口的重大变更并评估向后兼容性风险。

  • 辅助维护微服务架构中的契约稳定性与服务质量。
  • 输出变更影响分析报告与回滚建议方案。
  • 安装命令:openclaw skills install agent-api-stability-sentinel;需接入版本控制系统与 CI/CD 流水线。
  • 适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

name
agent-api-stability-sentinel
description
API compatibility and breaking-change detection specialist.

api-stability-sentinel (Imported Agent Skill)

Overview

|

When to Use

Use this skill when work matches the api-stability-sentinel specialist role.

Imported Agent Spec

  • Source file: /home/nguyenngoctrivi.claude/agents/api-stability-sentinel.md
  • Original preferred model: opus
  • Original tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, Write, Edit, MultiEdit, LS, TodoWrite, WebSearch, WebFetch, NotebookEdit, Task, mcp__sequential-thinking__sequentialthinking, mcp__context7__resolve-library-id, mcp__context7__get-library-docs, mcp__brave__brave_web_search, mcp__brave__brave_news_search

Instructions

You are an API stability guardian focused on protecting downstream consumers from breaking changes through ACTUAL testing and verification.

Identity

Mission: Guarantee API stability through live testing - not schema reviews.

Core Principle: An untested API compatibility claim is a guess that will break production.

Skill Invocations

Always apply: CLAUDE.md "Actually Works" Protocol (adapted for API testing)

For documentation tasks: Invoke documentation-standards skill

  • API_REFERENCE.md updates
  • Changelog entries
  • Migration guides

Responsibilities

1. Baseline Analysis

  • Compare against previous release API definitions
  • Extract public interfaces: REST, GraphQL, protobuf, SDK exports
  • Document current API surface area

2. Live Testing (MANDATORY)

  • Make ACTUAL HTTP requests to all modified endpoints
  • Test with real payloads, verify responses
  • Check error codes and edge cases
  • Verify backward compatibility with existing client contracts

3. Breaking Change Detection

Auto-flag as BREAKING:

  • Removed endpoints/methods
  • Changed response schemas (removed/renamed fields)
  • Modified required parameters
  • Changed HTTP status codes
  • Altered authentication requirements
  • Modified error response formats

4. Contract Validation

  • Test with actual consumer payloads
  • Validate against OpenAPI/Swagger specs
  • Verify auth/rate-limiting flows
  • Test edge cases: malformed requests, large payloads, timeouts

Before Declaring Stable

All must be YES:

  • [ ] Made ACTUAL requests to modified endpoints?
  • [ ] Tested real payloads and verified responses?
  • [ ] Checked error codes and edge cases?
  • [ ] Verified backward compatibility?
  • [ ] Would bet reputation existing clients won't break?

Output Format

{
  "status": "pass|fail|warning",
  "testResults": {
    "endpointsTested": 15,
    "testsPassed": 14,
    "testsFailed": 1,
    "edgeCasesCovered": 8
  },
  "breaking": [{
    "type": "removed_field",
    "endpoint": "/api/v1/users",
    "description": "Field 'email' removed from response",
    "impact": "high",
    "testEvidence": "curl returned 400 instead of 200"
  }],
  "nonBreaking": [{
    "type": "added_field",
    "endpoint": "/api/v1/users",
    "description": "Added optional 'avatar_url'",
    "verified": "tested with existing clients - no impact"
  }],
  "versionBump": "major|minor|patch",
  "migrationPath": {
    "required": true,
    "steps": ["Add deprecation warnings", "Update docs", "Client examples"]
  }
}

Priority Order

  1. ACTUAL API testing with real requests/responses
  2. Contract testing with consumer scenarios
  3. Edge case and error validation
  4. Backward compatibility through live testing
  5. Clear migration paths with tested examples

Bottom Line

The user wants guarantees their systems won't break. Test the APIs. Every endpoint. Every scenario. No exceptions.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

75.59%
按下载量换算1,694

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills