Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

afrexai-regulatory-compliance(afrexai 监管合规性)

afrexai-regulatory-compliance 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

afrexai-regulatory-compliance 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 4,144。

总安装 35,468周安装 1,508GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 12,426核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-regulatory-compliance(afrexai 监管合规性)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-regulatory-compliance
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-regulatory-compliance
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-regulatory-compliance

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

执行涵盖美国、英国和欧盟 8 个领域框架的全面监管合规审计,并提供风险评分和 90 天补救路线图。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install afrexai-regulatory-compliance;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

afrexai-regulatory-compliance 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install afrexai-regulatory-compliance。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

afrexai-regulatory-compliance 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

afrexai-regulatory-compliance 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

afrexai-regulatory-compliance 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

afrexai-regulatory-compliance 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 35,468 次,近一周安装 1,508 次,下载 12,426 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

afrexai-regulatory-compliance 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
afrexai-regulatory-compliance

afrexai 监管合规性 · 本页

35,468—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Regulatory Compliance Audit

Run a full regulatory compliance audit for any business. Covers US, UK, and EU frameworks across 8 compliance domains with gap analysis, risk scoring, and remediation timelines.

When to Use

  • Annual or quarterly compliance reviews
  • Pre-audit preparation (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS)
  • New market entry requiring regulatory assessment
  • Board or investor due diligence on compliance posture
  • Post-incident compliance gap analysis

How It Works

Step 1: Identify Applicable Frameworks

Based on the business profile (industry, geography, data types, revenue), determine which frameworks apply:

FrameworkTriggers
SOC 2 Type IIB2B SaaS, handles customer data
GDPRAny EU customer data, EU employees
HIPAAAny PHI (healthcare, benefits, wellness)
PCI DSSProcesses, stores, or transmits card data
ISO 27001Enterprise clients requesting certification
SOXPublic company or preparing for IPO
CCPA/CPRA>$25M revenue OR >50K CA consumers
NIST AI RMFDeploying AI/ML in production
UK DPA 2018UK operations or UK customer data
FCA/PRAUK financial services

Step 2: 8-Domain Compliance Assessment

Score each domain 1-5 (1=non-existent, 5=mature):

Domain 1: Data Governance

  • [ ] Data classification policy (public/internal/confidential/restricted)
  • [ ] Data retention schedule with legal hold procedures
  • [ ] Data processing agreements with all vendors
  • [ ] Cross-border transfer mechanisms (SCCs, adequacy decisions)
  • [ ] Data subject rights workflow (access, deletion, portability)
  • [ ] Data breach notification procedure (<72hr GDPR, state-specific US)

Domain 2: Access Control & Identity

  • [ ] Role-based access control (RBAC) implemented
  • [ ] Multi-factor authentication on all critical systems
  • [ ] Privileged access management (PAM) for admin accounts
  • [ ] Quarterly access reviews with evidence retention
  • [ ] Automated provisioning/deprovisioning tied to HR
  • [ ] Service account inventory with rotation schedule

Domain 3: Security Operations

  • [ ] Vulnerability management program (scan frequency, SLA by severity)
  • [ ] Penetration testing (annual minimum, after major changes)
  • [ ] Security incident response plan (tested within 12 months)
  • [ ] Log retention meeting regulatory minimums (1yr SOC 2, 6yr SOX)
  • [ ] Endpoint detection and response (EDR) on all endpoints
  • [ ] Network segmentation between environments

Domain 4: Business Continuity

  • [ ] Business impact analysis (BIA) current within 12 months
  • [ ] Disaster recovery plan with defined RTO/RPO by system tier
  • [ ] Backup testing (restore verified quarterly minimum)
  • [ ] Pandemic/remote work continuity procedures
  • [ ] Third-party dependency mapping for critical services
  • [ ] Communication plan (internal + external + regulatory)

Domain 5: Vendor & Third-Party Risk

  • [ ] Vendor risk assessment questionnaire (SIG Lite or equivalent)
  • [ ] Tiered vendor classification (critical/high/medium/low)
  • [ ] Annual vendor reviews for critical and high-tier vendors
  • [ ] Right-to-audit clauses in critical vendor contracts
  • [ ] Fourth-party risk assessment for critical vendors
  • [ ] Vendor offboarding procedure with data return/destruction

Domain 6: HR & Personnel Security

  • [ ] Background check policy (scope appropriate to role)
  • [ ] Security awareness training (annual + phishing simulations)
  • [ ] Acceptable use policy signed by all employees
  • [ ] Code of conduct with reporting mechanisms
  • [ ] Termination checklist (access removal, device collection, NDA reminder)
  • [ ] Contractor/temp worker security requirements

Domain 7: AI & Automation Governance

  • [ ] AI model inventory with risk classification
  • [ ] Bias testing and fairness metrics for decision-making models
  • [ ] Human-in-the-loop requirements defined per use case
  • [ ] AI incident response procedures
  • [ ] Transparency documentation (model cards, impact assessments)
  • [ ] Training data governance and lineage tracking

Domain 8: Financial & Reporting Controls

  • [ ] Segregation of duties in financial processes
  • [ ] Change management procedures for financial systems
  • [ ] Audit trail for all financial transactions
  • [ ] Revenue recognition controls (ASC 606 / IFRS 15)
  • [ ] Tax compliance calendar (federal, state, international)
  • [ ] Internal audit schedule and findings tracking

Step 3: Risk Scoring Matrix

For each gap identified:

LikelihoodImpactRisk ScoreAction Timeline
HighHighCriticalFix within 30 days
HighMediumHighFix within 60 days
MediumHighHighFix within 60 days
MediumMediumMediumFix within 90 days
LowHighMediumFix within 90 days
LowMediumLowNext quarterly review
LowLowInformationalAnnual review

Step 4: Remediation Roadmap

Build a 90-day plan:

Days 1-30: Critical Gaps

  • Address any gaps with Critical or High risk scores
  • Implement quick wins (policy updates, access reviews)
  • Engage external counsel for regulatory interpretation if needed

Days 31-60: Systematic Improvements

  • Deploy technical controls (MFA, EDR, log aggregation)
  • Complete vendor risk assessments for critical vendors
  • Update employee training program

Days 61-90: Evidence & Documentation

  • Build evidence collection system for ongoing compliance
  • Conduct internal audit of remediated areas
  • Prepare board-ready compliance dashboard

Step 5: Compliance Cost Benchmarks (2026)

Company SizeAnnual Compliance BudgetKey Cost Drivers
10-50 employees$30K-$80KSOC 2 audit ($15-30K), tools ($10-20K), training ($5-10K)
50-200 employees$80K-$250K+ DPO/compliance hire ($80-120K), pen testing ($15-40K)
200-1000 employees$250K-$800K+ GRC platform ($50-150K), multiple audits, legal counsel
1000+ employees$800K-$3M++ Dedicated compliance team, continuous monitoring, regulatory filings

Cost of non-compliance (real examples):

  • GDPR fines: up to 4% global annual revenue (Meta: €1.2B, 2023)
  • HIPAA: $100-$50K per violation, $1.5M annual cap per category
  • PCI DSS: $5K-$100K/month until compliant + liability for breaches
  • SOX: Criminal penalties, officer personal liability
  • Average data breach cost: $4.88M (IBM 2024)

Step 6: Output Format

Generate a compliance report with:

  1. Executive Summary — Overall maturity score (1-5), top 3 risks, recommended budget
  2. Framework Applicability Matrix — Which frameworks apply and current certification status
  3. Domain Scores — 8 domains with gap counts and risk distribution
  4. Critical Findings — Top 10 gaps ranked by risk score with remediation steps
  5. 90-Day Roadmap — Week-by-week action plan with owners and milestones
  6. Budget Estimate — Compliance cost projection for next 12 months
  7. Board Dashboard — One-page visual for board/investor reporting

Industry-Specific Requirements

IndustryPrimary FrameworksSpecial Considerations
SaaS/TechnologySOC 2, GDPR, CCPAAI governance, open source licensing
HealthcareHIPAA, HITRUST, FDA (if devices)PHI everywhere, BAAs required
Financial ServicesSOX, PCI DSS, GLBA, FCA/PRATransaction monitoring, AML/KYC
LegalABA ethics, GDPR, privilege rulesClient confidentiality, conflict checks
ConstructionOSHA, environmental, bondingSafety records, subcontractor compliance
E-commercePCI DSS, CCPA/GDPR, FTCPayment data, consumer protection, returns
ManufacturingISO 9001, OSHA, EPA, export controlsSupply chain compliance, ITAR/EAR
Real EstateFair Housing, AML, state licensingProperty data, transaction compliance
RecruitmentEEOC, GDPR (candidate data), ban-the-boxAI hiring bias (NYC Local 144), background checks
Professional ServicesIndustry-specific licensing, SOC 2Client data handling, engagement letters

7 Compliance Audit Mistakes That Cost Companies Millions

  1. Treating compliance as annual — It's continuous. Point-in-time audits miss 60% of gaps that develop mid-year.
  2. Ignoring AI governance — NIST AI RMF and EU AI Act are here. Every production model needs documentation.
  3. Vendor risk as checkbox — Your vendor's breach is your breach. Fourth-party risk is real.
  4. No evidence retention system — If you can't prove compliance, you're not compliant. Automate evidence collection.
  5. Security ≠ compliance — You can be secure and non-compliant, or compliant and insecure. Address both.
  6. Underbudgeting remediation — Plan for 2x the estimated remediation cost. Surprises are the norm.
  7. Board reporting as afterthought — Boards that see compliance dashboards quarterly make better risk decisions.

Get the full compliance implementation toolkit for your industry:

  • Browse all 10 industry context packs → https://afrexai-cto.github.io/context-packs/
  • Calculate your AI automation ROI → https://afrexai-cto.github.io/ai-revenue-calculator/
  • Set up your AI agent stack → https://afrexai-cto.github.io/agent-setup/

Bundles: Playbook $27 | Pick 3 $97 | All 10 $197 | Everything $247

平台分布

OpenClaw

80.05%
按下载量换算9,947

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills