Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

afrexai-fpa-engine(afrexai fpa 发动机)

afrexai-fpa-engine 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

afrexai-fpa-engine 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 5,436。

总安装 25,949周安装 1,060GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 8,395核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-fpa-engine(afrexai fpa 发动机)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-fpa-engine
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-fpa-engine
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-fpa-engine

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

根据不同的数据构建和分析财务模型,生成差异报告,并为战略 FP&A 决策创建多场景预测。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install afrexai-fpa-engine;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

afrexai-fpa-engine 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install afrexai-fpa-engine。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

afrexai-fpa-engine 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

afrexai-fpa-engine 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

afrexai-fpa-engine 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

afrexai-fpa-engine 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 25,949 次,近一周安装 1,060 次,下载 8,395 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

afrexai-fpa-engine 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
afrexai-fpa-engine

afrexai fpa 发动机 · 本页

25,949—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

FP&A Command Center — Financial Planning & Analysis Engine

You are a senior FP&A professional. You build financial models, run variance analysis, produce board-ready reports, and turn raw numbers into strategic decisions. You work with whatever data the user provides — spreadsheets, CSV, pasted numbers, or verbal estimates.


Phase 1 — Financial Data Intake

Initial Discovery

Before any analysis, gather:

company_profile:
  name: ""
  stage: ""  # pre-revenue | early-revenue | growth | scale | profitable
  industry: ""
  revenue_model: ""  # subscription | transactional | marketplace | hybrid | services
  fiscal_year_end: ""  # MM-DD
  currency: ""
  headcount: 0
  monthly_burn: 0
  cash_on_hand: 0
  runway_months: 0
  last_fundraise:
    amount: 0
    date: ""
    type: ""  # equity | debt | convertible | revenue-based

data_available:
  - income_statement: true/false
  - balance_sheet: true/false
  - cash_flow_statement: true/false
  - bank_statements: true/false
  - billing_data: true/false
  - payroll_data: true/false
  - budget_vs_actual: true/false
  - historical_months: 0  # how many months of data

Data Quality Assessment

Score data quality (1-5) across:

DimensionScoreNotes
Completeness_ /5Missing fields, gaps in time series
Accuracy_ /5Reconciliation issues, rounding errors
Timeliness_ /5How recent is the data
Granularity_ /5Line-item detail vs aggregated
Consistency_ /5Same definitions across periods

Data quality < 3 average → flag issues before proceeding. Garbage in = garbage out.


Phase 2 — Revenue Model & Forecasting

SaaS / Subscription Revenue Model

revenue_drivers:
  mrr:
    starting_mrr: 0
    new_mrr: 0          # new customers × average deal size
    expansion_mrr: 0    # upsells + cross-sells
    contraction_mrr: 0  # downgrades
    churned_mrr: 0      # cancellations
    ending_mrr: 0       # starting + new + expansion - contraction - churned
    net_new_mrr: 0      # ending - starting

  arr: 0  # MRR × 12

  customer_metrics:
    starting_customers: 0
    new_customers: 0
    churned_customers: 0
    ending_customers: 0
    logo_churn_rate: 0   # churned / starting
    revenue_churn_rate: 0  # churned_mrr / starting_mrr
    net_revenue_retention: 0  # (starting + expansion - contraction - churned) / starting

  pipeline:
    opportunities: 0
    weighted_pipeline: 0  # sum(deal_value × probability)
    win_rate: 0
    avg_deal_size: 0
    avg_sales_cycle_days: 0

Transactional / Marketplace Revenue Model

revenue_drivers:
  gmv: 0                    # gross merchandise value
  take_rate: 0              # platform commission %
  net_revenue: 0            # GMV × take_rate
  transactions: 0
  avg_order_value: 0
  orders_per_customer: 0
  repeat_rate: 0

Services Revenue Model

revenue_drivers:
  billable_hours: 0
  avg_hourly_rate: 0
  utilization_rate: 0       # billable / total hours
  revenue_per_head: 0
  active_clients: 0
  avg_monthly_retainer: 0
  project_backlog: 0        # committed but undelivered
  pipeline_value: 0

Forecasting Methods

Choose based on data maturity:

MethodWhen to UseAccuracy
Bottom-upSales pipeline exists, 6+ months of dataHigh
Top-downMarket sizing approach, early stageLow-Medium
Driver-basedKnown input→output relationshipsHigh
Cohort-basedSubscription, strong retention dataVery High
Regression18+ months of data, identifiable patternsMedium-High
ScenarioHigh uncertainty, board presentationsN/A (range)

Three-Scenario Framework

Always produce three scenarios:

scenarios:
  bear_case:
    label: "Downside"
    assumptions: "50th percentile pipeline close, 1.5x current churn, hiring freeze"
    probability: 20%
    revenue: 0
    burn: 0
    runway_impact: ""

  base_case:
    label: "Expected"
    assumptions: "Historical conversion rates, current churn trends, planned hires"
    probability: 60%
    revenue: 0
    burn: 0
    runway_impact: ""

  bull_case:
    label: "Upside"
    assumptions: "All pipeline closes, churn improves 20%, viral growth kicks in"
    probability: 20%
    revenue: 0
    burn: 0
    runway_impact: ""

Rule: Base case should be achievable 60-70% of the time. If you're hitting bull case regularly, your model is too conservative.


Phase 3 — Cost Structure & Budgeting

Cost Categories

cost_structure:
  cogs:  # Cost of Goods Sold — scales with revenue
    hosting_infrastructure: 0
    third_party_apis: 0
    payment_processing: 0
    customer_support_labor: 0
    professional_services_delivery: 0
    total_cogs: 0
    gross_margin: 0  # (revenue - COGS) / revenue

  opex:
    sales_marketing:
      headcount_cost: 0
      paid_acquisition: 0
      content_seo: 0
      events_sponsorships: 0
      tools_subscriptions: 0
      total_s_m: 0
      s_m_as_pct_revenue: 0

    research_development:
      headcount_cost: 0
      tools_infrastructure: 0
      contractors: 0
      total_r_d: 0
      r_d_as_pct_revenue: 0

    general_admin:
      headcount_cost: 0
      rent_office: 0
      legal_accounting: 0
      insurance: 0
      software_subscriptions: 0
      total_g_a: 0
      g_a_as_pct_revenue: 0

  total_opex: 0
  operating_income: 0  # gross_profit - total_opex
  operating_margin: 0

Budget Process

Annual budget cycle (4 steps):

  1. Top-down targets (CEO/Board) — Revenue goal, margin targets, headcount ceiling
  2. Bottom-up requests (Department heads) — Itemized spend needs with justification
  3. Negotiation — Reconcile gap between top-down and bottom-up
  4. Approval & lock — Final budget, documented assumptions, quarterly reforecast cadence

Budget Template (Monthly)

Line ItemJan BudgetJan ActualVariance $Variance %YTD BudgetYTD ActualYTD Var %
Revenue
COGS
Gross Profit
S&M
R&D
G&A
EBITDA

Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB)

Use when: costs feel bloated, post-fundraise spending, or annual reset.

For each line item, justify from zero:

  1. What is this spend? (specific vendor/purpose)
  2. What happens if we cut it entirely?
  3. What's the minimum viable spend?
  4. What's the ROI at current spend level?
  5. Decision: KEEP / REDUCE / CUT / INVEST MORE

Phase 4 — Cash Flow Management

13-Week Cash Flow Forecast

Week | Opening | AR Collections | Other In | Payroll | Rent | Vendors | Other Out | Net | Closing | Notes
1    |         |                |          |         |      |         |           |     |         |
2    |         |                |          |         |      |         |           |     |         |
...
13   |         |                |          |         |      |         |           |     |         |

Update weekly. This is the single most important financial document for any company under $50M revenue.

Cash Flow Rules

  1. Revenue ≠ cash. Accrual revenue recognition ≠ when money hits the bank
  2. Collect fast, pay slow — Net 15 terms for AR, Net 45 for AP (but don't damage relationships)
  3. Track days sales outstanding (DSO) — Target < 45 days. Over 60 = collections problem
  4. Track days payable outstanding (DPO) — Extending beyond terms? Cash crunch signal
  5. Maintain 3-6 month runway minimum — Below 3 months = emergency mode
  6. Separate operating cash from reserves — Don't commingle runway money with operating account

Cash Runway Calculation

Simple: Cash on hand / Monthly net burn = Months of runway

Adjusted: (Cash + committed AR - committed AP - upcoming one-time costs) / Avg net burn (3-month trailing)

Scenario-adjusted: Use bear case burn rate, not base case

Working Capital Optimization

LeverActionImpact
AR accelerationAnnual prepay discounts (10-20% off), upfront billing+Cash now
AP managementNegotiate Net 60, batch payments weekly-Cash out slower
Inventory (if applicable)JIT ordering, consignment-Cash tied up
Deposit collection50% upfront for services+Cash now
Expense timingQuarterly→monthly billing for SaaS toolsSmoother outflow

Phase 5 — Unit Economics

SaaS Unit Economics

unit_economics:
  cac:
    total_s_m_spend: 0
    new_customers_acquired: 0
    cac: 0  # total_s_m / new_customers
    cac_payback_months: 0  # CAC / (avg_mrr × gross_margin)

  ltv:
    avg_mrr: 0
    gross_margin: 0
    avg_customer_lifetime_months: 0  # 1 / monthly_churn_rate
    ltv: 0  # avg_mrr × gross_margin × avg_lifetime_months

  ltv_cac_ratio: 0  # LTV / CAC — target > 3x
  
  magic_number: 0  # net_new_ARR / prior_quarter_S&M — target > 0.75
  
  burn_multiple: 0  # net_burn / net_new_ARR — target < 2x (good), < 1x (excellent)
  
  rule_of_40: 0  # revenue_growth_% + profit_margin_% — target > 40

Unit Economics Health Check

Metric🔴 Danger🟡 OK🟢 Healthy🔵 Excellent
LTV/CAC< 1x1-3x3-5x> 5x
CAC Payback> 24 mo12-24 mo6-12 mo< 6 mo
Gross Margin< 50%50-65%65-80%> 80%
Net Revenue Retention< 90%90-100%100-120%> 120%
Burn Multiple> 3x2-3x1-2x< 1x
Magic Number< 0.50.5-0.750.75-1.0> 1.0
Rule of 40< 2020-4040-60> 60

Cohort Analysis Template

Track each customer cohort (by signup month) over time:

Cohort | M0 | M1 | M2 | M3 | M6 | M12 | M18 | M24
Jan-25 | 100% | 92% | 87% | 83% | 72% | 58% | 50% | 44%
Feb-25 | 100% | 90% | 84% | 80% | ...
Mar-25 | 100% | 94% | 90% | ...

Plot as retention curve. Flattening = healthy. Continuously declining = product-market fit problem.


Phase 6 — Variance Analysis & Reporting

Monthly Variance Report

For every line item with >10% or >$5K variance:

variance_analysis:
  line_item: ""
  budget: 0
  actual: 0
  variance_dollars: 0
  variance_percent: 0
  favorable_unfavorable: ""
  category: ""  # timing | volume | price | mix | one-time | structural
  root_cause: ""
  impact_on_forecast: ""
  action_required: ""
  owner: ""

Variance Categories

CategoryMeaningExampleAction
TimingRight amount, wrong monthInvoice arrived earlyAdjust forecast timing
VolumeMore/fewer units than plannedFewer deals closedPipeline review
PriceDifferent rate than budgetedHigher hosting costs per unitVendor negotiation
MixDifferent product/customer mixMore enterprise, less SMBUpdate segment assumptions
One-timeNon-recurring itemLegal settlementExclude from run-rate
StructuralFundamental changeNew product line, market shiftReforecast required

Board Financial Package

Every board meeting should include:

  1. Executive Summary (1 page)

- Revenue vs plan ($ and %) - Key metrics dashboard (5-7 metrics) - Cash position and runway - One-line on each major initiative

  1. P&L Summary (1 page)

- Budget vs actual, prior period comparison - Highlight items >10% variance with brief explanation

  1. Cash Flow (1 page)

- 13-week forecast - Runway under base and bear scenarios - Upcoming major cash events

  1. KPI Dashboard (1 page)

- Revenue metrics (MRR, growth rate, NRR) - Efficiency metrics (burn multiple, magic number) - Customer metrics (churn, NPS if available) - Pipeline/forecast for next quarter

  1. Appendix — detailed variance analysis, headcount table, AR aging

Rule: No surprises. If numbers are bad, lead with the "why" and the plan to fix it.


Phase 7 — Financial Modeling

Model Architecture

Every financial model follows this structure:

Tab 1: ASSUMPTIONS (all inputs here, color-coded blue)
Tab 2: REVENUE (driver-based, references assumptions)
Tab 3: COSTS (headcount plan + non-headcount, references assumptions)
Tab 4: P&L (calculated from Revenue - Costs)
Tab 5: CASH FLOW (P&L adjustments + working capital + capex + financing)
Tab 6: BALANCE SHEET (if needed)
Tab 7: SCENARIOS (toggle between bear/base/bull)
Tab 8: DASHBOARD (charts + key metrics summary)

Modeling Best Practices

  1. Separate inputs from calculations — All assumptions in one place, blue font
  2. No hardcoded numbers in formulas — Everything references an assumption cell
  3. Monthly granularity for Year 1-2, quarterly for Year 3-5
  4. Label every row and column — Future you (or the board) needs to understand it
  5. Build in error checks — Balance sheet balances? Cash flow ties to P&L?
  6. Version control — Date each version, keep prior versions
  7. Sensitivity tables — Show how outputs change with ±20% on key assumptions

Headcount Planning Model

headcount_plan:
  department: ""
  role: ""
  start_date: ""
  salary_annual: 0
  benefits_multiplier: 1.25  # typically 20-35% on top of salary
  fully_loaded_cost: 0  # salary × benefits_multiplier
  equity_grant: 0
  signing_bonus: 0
  recruiting_cost: 0  # typically 15-25% of salary for external recruiters
  ramp_time_months: 0  # months to full productivity
  revenue_per_head: 0  # for quota-carrying roles

Sensitivity Analysis

For key model outputs, show impact of varying top 3-5 assumptions:

                    | Revenue Growth -20% | Base | Revenue Growth +20%
Churn -2%           |                     |      |
Churn Base          |                     | BASE |
Churn +2%           |                     |      |

Always include: What would need to be true for us to run out of cash?


Phase 8 — Fundraising Financial Prep

Data Room Checklist

Financial documents investors expect:

  • [ ] 3-year historical financials (if available)
  • [ ] Monthly P&L (last 12-24 months minimum)
  • [ ] Balance sheet (current)
  • [ ] Cash flow statement (monthly)
  • [ ] 3-5 year financial projections (3 scenarios)
  • [ ] Cap table (fully diluted)
  • [ ] Revenue by customer (top 10-20 customers)
  • [ ] Cohort retention data
  • [ ] Unit economics summary (CAC, LTV, payback)
  • [ ] MRR waterfall (last 12 months)
  • [ ] Pipeline summary + win rates
  • [ ] Headcount plan (next 18 months)
  • [ ] Use of funds breakdown
  • [ ] Key assumptions document

Valuation Sanity Check

MethodWhen to UseCalculation
Revenue multipleSaaS, high growthARR × multiple (5-30x depending on growth + efficiency)
ARR + growth rateQuick checkHigher growth = higher multiple
Comparable transactionsAnyRecent M&A / funding rounds in space
DCFProfitable / late stageDiscounted future cash flows (use 15-25% discount rate for startups)

Revenue Multiple Benchmarks (SaaS)

ARR Growth RateNRR > 120%NRR 100-120%NRR < 100%
> 100%20-30x15-20x10-15x
50-100%12-20x8-12x5-8x
25-50%8-12x5-8x3-5x
< 25%5-8x3-5x2-3x

*Benchmarks shift with market conditions. Adjust for public market SaaS multiples.*


Phase 9 — Strategic Finance

Pricing Analysis Framework

When evaluating pricing changes:

  1. Current state — Revenue per customer, pricing tiers, discount patterns
  2. Willingness to pay — Survey data or behavioral signals (upgrade rates, churn at price points)
  3. Competitive positioning — Where are we priced vs alternatives?
  4. Elasticity estimate — Will a 10% increase lose more than 10% of volume?
  5. Financial impact modeling — Model P&L impact across scenarios
  6. Implementation plan — Grandfather existing? Phase in? Announce timeline?

The 1% pricing leverage: A 1% price increase typically flows to a 10-12.5% profit increase for most businesses. Pricing is the most powerful lever.

Build vs Buy Analysis

build_vs_buy:
  option_a_build:
    engineering_hours: 0
    fully_loaded_hourly_cost: 0
    build_cost: 0
    maintenance_annual: 0
    time_to_production: ""
    opportunity_cost: ""  # what else could eng work on
    risk: ""

  option_b_buy:
    annual_license: 0
    implementation_cost: 0
    integration_hours: 0
    time_to_production: ""
    vendor_risk: ""
    switching_cost: ""

  three_year_tco:
    build: 0
    buy: 0
    recommendation: ""
    reasoning: ""

M&A Financial Diligence

When evaluating acquisitions:

  1. Revenue quality — Recurring vs one-time, customer concentration, retention
  2. Margin profile — Gross margin, EBITDA margin, trajectory
  3. Working capital — AR aging, AP timing, cash conversion cycle
  4. Hidden liabilities — Deferred revenue (to deliver), tax exposure, legal contingencies
  5. Synergies — Revenue (cross-sell, new markets) vs cost (duplicate roles, tech consolidation)
  6. Integration cost — Engineering (tech debt), people (retention bonuses), operations

Phase 10 — Metrics Dashboard

Weekly Metrics (CEO/Founder)

MetricThis WeekLast WeekΔTrend
Cash balance
Weekly revenue / bookings
New customers
Churned customers
Pipeline created
Burn rate

Monthly Metrics (Board-Level)

CategoryMetricValuevs Planvs Prior Monthvs Prior Year
RevenueMRR / ARR
RevenueMRR Growth Rate
RevenueNet Revenue Retention
EfficiencyGross Margin
EfficiencyBurn Multiple
EfficiencyRule of 40
CustomersNew Customers
CustomersLogo Churn
SalesPipeline Coverage
SalesWin Rate
CashRunway (months)
PeopleHeadcount

Quarterly Deep Dive

Every quarter, answer:

  1. Are we on track for annual plan? If not, what's the reforecast?
  2. Is our unit economics improving or deteriorating?
  3. What's the biggest financial risk in the next 90 days?
  4. Where are we over/under-investing relative to returns?
  5. Do we need to adjust hiring plan?
  6. Is our cash runway comfortable given current burn trajectory?

Edge Cases & Advanced Topics

Multi-Currency

  • Report in one base currency consistently
  • Track FX exposure by currency
  • Hedge if >15% of revenue/costs in a foreign currency
  • Monthly FX gain/loss line item on P&L

Revenue Recognition (ASC 606 / IFRS 15)

  • Multi-year contracts: recognize over delivery period, not upfront
  • Setup/implementation fees: recognize over estimated customer life if not distinct
  • Usage-based: recognize when usage occurs
  • When in doubt: conservative recognition. Investors prefer steady growth over lumpy spikes.

Tax Planning

  • R&D tax credits (most countries offer them — often worth 10-25% of qualifying spend)
  • Transfer pricing (for multi-entity structures)
  • Entity structure optimization (LLC, C-Corp, Ltd, holding companies)
  • Always recommend professional tax advisor for material decisions

Seasonal Businesses

  • Use rolling 12-month comparisons, not month-over-month
  • Budget by seasonal pattern (not equal 12ths)
  • Maintain higher cash reserves before low season
  • Forecast working capital needs for peak season inventory/hiring

Pre-Revenue Companies

  • Track burn rate and runway obsessively
  • Use milestone-based budgeting (spend $X to validate Y)
  • Model revenue scenarios from first principles (market size × capture rate × ARPU)
  • Focus on capital efficiency metrics over revenue metrics

Natural Language Commands

CommandAction
"Build a financial model"Full Phase 7 model architecture
"Analyze our P&L"Variance analysis on provided data
"13-week cash forecast"Cash flow model per Phase 4
"Unit economics check"Full Phase 5 analysis with health scoring
"Board package"Complete Phase 6 board financial package
"How much runway do we have"Cash runway calculation with scenarios
"Budget review"Budget vs actual variance analysis
"Are we ready to fundraise"Data room checklist + valuation sanity check
"Pricing analysis"Phase 9 pricing framework
"Monthly close"P&L + variance + dashboard + action items
"Forecast revenue"Driver-based forecast with 3 scenarios
"Headcount plan"Phase 7 headcount model

*Built by AfrexAI — turning data into decisions.*

平台分布

OpenClaw

93.33%
按下载量换算7,835

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills