Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

afrexai-executive-coaching(Afrexai 高管教练)

afrexai-executive-coaching 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

afrexai-executive-coaching 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 9,042。

总安装 15,037周安装 613GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 4,953核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-executive-coaching(Afrexai 高管教练)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-executive-coaching
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-executive-coaching
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-executive-coaching

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

Afrexai 高管教练提供领导力评估和360°反馈,制定发展计划提升团队效能。适用于高管能力提升和组织变革支持。支持教练参与、反馈收集和目标对齐,输出个性化成长路径。安装命令:openclaw skills install afrexai-executive-coaching,需确认保密协议。

涉及高层人员数据时,应先确认授权级别和脱敏规则。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install afrexai-executive-coaching;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

afrexai-executive-coaching 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install afrexai-executive-coaching。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

afrexai-executive-coaching 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

afrexai-executive-coaching 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

afrexai-executive-coaching 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

afrexai-executive-coaching 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 15,037 次,近一周安装 613 次,下载 4,953 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

afrexai-executive-coaching 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
afrexai-executive-coaching

Afrexai 高管教练 · 本页

15,037—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
Executive Coaching & Leadership Development Engine
description
Complete executive coaching system — leadership assessment, 360° feedback, coaching engagements, leadership development plans, team effectiveness, executive presence, and succession planning. Use for leadership coaching, executive development programs, team building, performance breakthroughs, and career transitions.
metadata
category
role
skills
["coaching", "leadership", "executive-development", "360-feedback", "team-effectiveness", "succession-planning", "executive-presence", "performance", "career-transition"]

Executive Coaching & Leadership Development Engine

Complete methodology for coaching leaders at every level — from first-time managers to C-suite executives. Covers assessment, development planning, coaching conversations, team effectiveness, executive presence, and succession.


Phase 1: Leadership Assessment & Baseline

Quick Leadership Health Check (/8)

Score each dimension 0-2 (0=weak, 1=developing, 2=strong):

DimensionScoreEvidence
Strategic clarityCan articulate 3-year vision in 30 seconds?
Decision velocityMakes decisions within appropriate timeframes?
Team developmentDirect reports growing and being promoted?
Communication impactMessages understood and acted on first time?
Self-awarenessKnows blind spots and actively manages them?
Results deliveryConsistently hits or exceeds targets?
Stakeholder trustHas advocates across the organization?
Energy managementSustainable pace, not burning out?

Score interpretation:

  • 14-16: High-performing leader — focus on mastery and legacy
  • 10-13: Solid foundation — targeted development on 2-3 areas
  • 6-9: Development needed — structured coaching engagement
  • 0-5: Critical — intensive support required

Leadership Assessment Brief

leader_profile:
  name: ""
  role: ""
  level: "" # IC → Manager → Director → VP → C-Suite
  tenure_in_role: ""
  direct_reports: 0
  org_size: 0 # total people in their org
  
context:
  company_stage: "" # startup/growth/mature/turnaround
  industry: ""
  current_challenges: []
  recent_changes: [] # reorg, new boss, M&A, layoffs
  
assessment:
  strengths: # things they do well consistently
    - strength: ""
      evidence: ""
  development_areas: # things limiting their impact
    - area: ""
      impact: "" # how this shows up day-to-day
      root_cause: "" # underlying driver
  derailers: # behaviors that could end their career
    - behavior: ""
      trigger: "" # when it shows up
      risk_level: "" # low/medium/high/critical
      
leadership_style:
  primary: "" # visionary/coaching/affiliative/democratic/pacesetting/commanding
  secondary: ""
  overused: "" # style used too much
  underused: "" # style needed but avoided
  
stakeholder_perception:
  boss_view: ""
  peer_view: ""
  direct_report_view: ""
  cross_functional_view: ""

Level-Appropriate Focus Areas

LevelPrimary FocusSecondary FocusTrap to Avoid
New ManagerDelegation, feedback, 1:1sTeam norms, hiringDoing IC work instead of managing
Senior ManagerStrategy, cross-team influenceTalent development, metricsMicromanaging experienced reports
DirectorOrg design, executive communicationPolitical navigation, budgetGetting pulled into execution
VPVision, culture, board interactionM&A, P&L ownershipTrying to manage every team
C-SuiteEnterprise strategy, external presenceBoard management, successionIsolation, echo chamber

Phase 2: 360° Feedback System

360° Feedback Survey Design

Rater selection rules:

  • Manager: 1 (mandatory)
  • Peers: 3-5 (cross-functional preferred)
  • Direct reports: All if <8, random sample of 5-8 if larger
  • Skip-levels: 2-3 (optional but revealing)
  • External stakeholders: 1-2 (clients, board members, partners)
  • Self-assessment: Always include

Core competency questions (rate 1-5 + open comment):

strategic_thinking:
  - "Sets clear direction that aligns with business strategy"
  - "Anticipates market/competitive changes and adapts"
  - "Makes sound decisions with incomplete information"
  - "Balances short-term execution with long-term vision"

people_leadership:
  - "Creates an environment where people do their best work"
  - "Develops talent — direct reports grow under their leadership"
  - "Gives honest, actionable feedback regularly"
  - "Builds diverse, high-performing teams"
  - "Handles conflict directly and constructively"

execution:
  - "Delivers results consistently"
  - "Sets clear priorities and says no to distractions"
  - "Removes obstacles for their team"
  - "Holds people accountable without micromanaging"

communication:
  - "Communicates clearly — messages are understood first time"
  - "Listens genuinely — people feel heard"
  - "Adapts communication style to the audience"
  - "Handles difficult conversations with courage and empathy"

influence:
  - "Builds strong relationships across the organization"
  - "Persuades through logic and empathy, not authority"
  - "Navigates organizational politics effectively"
  - "Represents their team's interests to leadership"

self_leadership:
  - "Shows self-awareness about strengths and limitations"
  - "Remains calm and composed under pressure"
  - "Admits mistakes and learns from them"
  - "Models the behaviors they expect from others"

Open-ended questions (mandatory):

  1. "What should this leader START doing?"
  2. "What should this leader STOP doing?"
  3. "What should this leader CONTINUE doing?"
  4. "What is their greatest strength as a leader?"
  5. "What one thing, if changed, would make the biggest difference?"

360° Feedback Debrief Framework

debrief_structure:
  duration: "90 minutes"
  
  steps:
    1_self_assessment_first:
      - "Before showing results, ask: How do you think people perceive you?"
      - "Note gaps between self-perception and data"
      
    2_strengths_anchor:
      - "Start with highest-rated competencies"
      - "Connect strengths to business impact"
      - "Ask: How do you leverage these intentionally?"
      
    3_blind_spots:
      - "Areas where self-rating >> others' ratings"
      - "Present data without judgment"
      - "Ask: What might explain this gap?"
      
    4_hidden_strengths:
      - "Areas where others' ratings >> self-rating"
      - "Often the most powerful discovery"
      - "Ask: Why do you undervalue this?"
      
    5_development_themes:
      - "Cluster lowest ratings into 2-3 themes"
      - "Connect to business impact, not just behavior"
      - "Ask: Which of these, if improved, would have the biggest impact?"
      
    6_commitment:
      - "Select 1-2 focus areas maximum"
      - "Define specific behavioral changes"
      - "Identify accountability structure"

  rules:
    - "Never reveal individual rater responses"
    - "Present themes, not outliers"
    - "Let the leader draw conclusions before offering interpretation"
    - "Normalize emotional reactions — frustration, defensiveness, sadness are all normal"
    - "End with forward-looking energy, not backward-looking analysis"

Phase 3: Coaching Engagement Design

Engagement Structure

coaching_engagement:
  type: "" # developmental/performance/transition/onboarding/derailment
  duration: "" # typically 6-12 months
  frequency: "" # biweekly is standard, weekly for intensive
  session_length: "60 minutes" # 90 for first session
  
  goals: # max 3
    - goal: ""
      success_metric: "" # how we'll know it's working
      business_impact: "" # why this matters to the org
      timeline: ""
      
  stakeholders:
    sponsor: "" # usually the leader's boss
    hr_partner: ""
    check_in_cadence: "" # monthly/quarterly with sponsor
    
  boundaries:
    confidential: "Content of sessions is confidential"
    exceptions: "Safety concerns, ethics violations, or legal issues"
    sponsor_updates: "Themes and progress only, not specifics"
    
  success_criteria:
    leading_indicators: [] # behavioral changes visible in 30-60 days
    lagging_indicators: [] # business results visible in 90-180 days
    360_remeasure: "At 6 months — expecting 0.5+ point improvement on focus areas"

Engagement Type Decision Matrix

TypeDurationTriggerFocusIntensity
Developmental6-12 moHigh-potential investmentGrow to next levelBiweekly
Performance3-6 moPerformance gapClose specific gapsWeekly→Biweekly
Transition3-6 moNew role/companyAccelerate rampWeekly first 90 days
Onboarding3 moExecutive hireCultural integrationWeekly
Derailment3-6 moCareer-threatening behaviorBehavioral changeWeekly + stakeholder

Phase 4: Coaching Conversation Mastery

Session Structure (60 minutes)

session_flow:
  check_in: # 5 min
    - "How are you arriving today? (energy/mindset)"
    - "What happened with your commitments from last session?"
    - "Score: Did you do what you said? (1-10)"
    
  agenda_setting: # 5 min
    - "What's most important for us to focus on today?"
    - "What would make this hour valuable?"
    - "If we could only solve one thing, what would it be?"
    
  exploration: # 30 min
    - "Deep dive into the topic"
    - "Use coaching models (GROW, CLEAR, etc.)"
    - "Challenge assumptions, reframe, explore options"
    
  action_planning: # 15 min
    - "What will you do differently?"
    - "What's the first step? By when?"
    - "What might get in the way?"
    - "Who else needs to be involved?"
    - "How will you know it's working?"
    
  reflection: # 5 min
    - "What was most useful about today's conversation?"
    - "What are you taking away?"
    - "Anything we need to revisit next time?"

The GROW Model (Core Coaching Framework)

G — Goal: "What do you want to achieve?"
  - "What does success look like specifically?"
  - "How will you know when you've reached it?"
  - "What's the timeline?"
  - "Is this within your control?"

R — Reality: "What's happening now?"
  - "What have you already tried?"
  - "What's working? What isn't?"
  - "On a scale of 1-10, where are you now?"
  - "What are you not seeing?"
  - "What would your team say about this?"

O — Options: "What could you do?"
  - "What are all the possible approaches?"
  - "What would you do if resources were unlimited?"
  - "What would [someone you admire] do?"
  - "What's the opposite of what you'd normally do?"
  - "What have you seen work in similar situations?"
  - "What if you did nothing?"

W — Will: "What will you do?"
  - "Which option resonates most?"
  - "On a scale of 1-10, how committed are you?"
  - "If less than 8, what would make it an 8?"
  - "What's the very first action?"
  - "When will you do it?"
  - "What support do you need?"

50 Powerful Coaching Questions by Category

Self-awareness:

  1. "What do people experience when they interact with you?"
  2. "What story are you telling yourself about this?"
  3. "What would your harshest critic say? What truth is in that?"
  4. "When are you at your absolute best? What's present?"
  5. "What are you pretending not to know?"
  6. "What pattern do you keep repeating?"
  7. "What would the version of you that's already solved this say?"

Decision-making:

  1. "What would you advise someone else in this situation?"
  2. "What's the cost of not deciding?"
  3. "What's the worst case? Can you live with that?"
  4. "What decision are you avoiding?"
  5. "If you had to decide in 5 minutes, what would you choose?"
  6. "What does your gut say? Why aren't you trusting it?"

Courage & action:

  1. "What are you afraid will happen?"
  2. "What conversation are you avoiding?"
  3. "What would you do if you weren't afraid?"
  4. "What's the smallest experiment you could run?"
  5. "What's the 80% solution you could ship today?"
  6. "What will you regret NOT doing?"

Team & relationships:

  1. "What does your team need from you that they're not getting?"
  2. "Who on your team is struggling and you're avoiding the conversation?"
  3. "What would your direct reports say behind your back?"
  4. "Where are you rescuing instead of developing?"
  5. "What relationship, if repaired, would unlock the most progress?"
  6. "Who do you need in your corner that isn't there yet?"

Strategic thinking:

  1. "What's the one thing that, if you got right, would make everything else easier?"
  2. "What should you stop doing that you're holding onto?"
  3. "Where are you optimizing for the wrong metric?"
  4. "What's your theory of the case?"
  5. "What are you assuming that might not be true?"

Energy & sustainability:

  1. "What's draining your energy that you could eliminate?"
  2. "Where are you saying yes when you mean no?"
  3. "What would it take to operate at 80% effort sustainably?"
  4. "When did you last do nothing? How did that feel?"
  5. "What fills you up that you've deprioritized?"

Growth & learning:

  1. "What failure taught you the most?"
  2. "What feedback are you dismissing that might be true?"
  3. "What skill, if developed, would change your trajectory?"
  4. "Where is your ego getting in the way?"
  5. "What do you know now that you wish you knew a year ago?"

Vision & purpose:

  1. "Why does this role matter to you beyond the paycheck?"
  2. "What legacy do you want to leave in this organization?"
  3. "What would make you proud when you look back in 5 years?"
  4. "What's the work only you can do?"
  5. "What impact are you uniquely positioned to have?"

Reframing:

  1. "What if this problem is actually an opportunity?"
  2. "What would this look like if it were easy?"
  3. "What are you making this mean that it doesn't have to mean?"
  4. "Who else has navigated this successfully? What can you learn?"
  5. "What's the upside of this difficult situation?"

Advanced Coaching Techniques

Challenging with care:

  • Mirror: "I notice you said X but your energy dropped. What's underneath that?"
  • Direct: "I'm going to be blunt. The data says Y. How do you see it?"
  • Meta: "We've discussed this topic three sessions in a row. What's keeping you stuck?"
  • Hypothesis: "I have a theory. Can I share it? [wait for permission]"

Working with resistance:

  • Name it: "I sense some resistance. What's that about?"
  • Validate it: "It makes sense you'd feel that way given..."
  • Explore it: "What's the resistance protecting you from?"
  • Leverage it: "What would have to be true for you to move forward despite this?"

Silence as a tool:

  • After a powerful question: wait at least 10 seconds
  • When they say "I don't know": say nothing — they usually do know
  • After an emotional moment: let it breathe
  • When they're processing: resist the urge to fill space

Somatic awareness:

  • "Where do you feel that in your body?"
  • "What just shifted when you said that?"
  • "Your voice changed when you mentioned X. What's happening?"
  • "Take a breath. What comes up?"

Phase 5: Leadership Development Plan

Development Plan Template

leadership_development_plan:
  leader: ""
  date: ""
  review_date: "" # 90 days out
  
  vision:
    next_role: "" # where they're heading
    timeline: "" # realistic horizon
    gap_to_next_level: "" # biggest gap between now and next level
    
  focus_areas: # max 2-3
    - area: ""
      current_state: "" # specific behaviors today
      target_state: "" # specific behaviors in 6 months
      why_it_matters: "" # business impact
      
      development_actions:
        learn: # 10% — knowledge acquisition
          - action: ""
            resource: "" # book, course, podcast
            by_when: ""
            
        practice: # 70% — on-the-job application
          - action: "" # specific situation to practice in
            frequency: "" # daily/weekly
            success_look: "" # what good looks like
            
        connect: # 20% — feedback and relationships
          - action: "" # mentor, feedback partner, peer group
            who: ""
            cadence: ""
            
      progress_indicators:
        30_day: "" # leading indicator
        60_day: "" # early results
        90_day: "" # measurable outcome
        
  support_needed:
    from_manager: []
    from_hr: []
    from_coach: []
    stretch_assignments: []
    
  review_schedule:
    - date: "" # 30-day
      focus: "Are actions being taken? Early signals?"
    - date: "" # 60-day
      focus: "Behavioral changes visible? Adjust plan?"
    - date: "" # 90-day
      focus: "Results materializing? Set next phase?"

70-20-10 Development Action Library

70% On-the-job (Experience):

  • Lead a cross-functional initiative outside comfort zone
  • Present to a more senior audience (board, exec team, all-hands)
  • Take on a turnaround project (fix something broken)
  • Manage a crisis or urgent situation end-to-end
  • Hire and onboard a senior leader
  • Deliver difficult feedback to a peer or senior stakeholder
  • Run a strategy offsite
  • Negotiate a significant deal or vendor contract
  • Manage a budget 2x your current scope
  • Represent the company externally (conference, customer, press)

20% Relationships (Exposure):

  • Shadow a C-suite executive for a week
  • Find a mentor outside your function/industry
  • Join a peer learning group (YPO, EO, or internal cohort)
  • Reverse mentor a junior employee
  • Get a "truth-teller" — someone who gives unfiltered feedback
  • Build 3 new cross-functional relationships this quarter
  • Seek 360° feedback from 5 stakeholders informally
  • Attend a board meeting as an observer

10% Formal Learning (Education):

  • Executive education program (2-5 days)
  • Leadership assessment tool (Hogan, StrengthsFinder, DISC, MBTI)
  • Read 2 leadership books per quarter
  • Complete an online leadership course
  • Attend an industry leadership conference
  • Take a course in an adjacent skill (finance for non-finance, tech for non-tech)

Phase 6: Executive Presence

Executive Presence Framework (4 Pillars)

executive_presence:
  gravitas: # 67% of EP — the most important
    components:
      - confidence: "Projects calm certainty without arrogance"
      - decisiveness: "Makes calls and owns them"
      - composure: "Stays steady under pressure"
      - vision: "Connects today's work to tomorrow's destination"
      - authenticity: "Consistent in public and private"
    
    development:
      - "Practice the 3-second pause before responding"
      - "Prepare your 'point of view' on every topic before meetings"
      - "Use 'I believe...' and 'My recommendation is...' not 'I think maybe...'"
      - "When challenged, acknowledge the point, then restate your position"
      - "Own mistakes immediately: 'That was my call. Here's what I learned.'"
      
  communication: # 28% of EP
    components:
      - clarity: "Simple, jargon-free, structured"
      - storytelling: "Uses narrative to make data memorable"
      - listening: "Makes others feel genuinely heard"
      - adaptation: "Adjusts style for board vs team vs 1:1"
      - brevity: "Says more with fewer words"
    
    development:
      - "Structure every message: Point → Evidence → Implication → Action"
      - "Practice the 'one headline' test — can you say it in one sentence?"
      - "Record yourself presenting — watch once a month"
      - "Ask 2 questions for every 1 statement in meetings"
      - "Use silence intentionally — pause 3 seconds after key points"
      
  appearance: # 5% of EP — least important but still matters
    components:
      - dress: "Appropriate for context, slightly above the room"
      - energy: "Projects vitality and engagement"
      - body_language: "Open posture, appropriate eye contact"
      - environment: "Organized space, professional virtual setup"
    
    development:
      - "Match dress code to the audience, not your team"
      - "Stand or use a standing desk for important calls"
      - "Eliminate filler words (um, like, you know)"
      - "Video calls: camera at eye level, good lighting, clean background"

Situation-Specific Presence Guides

Board presentations:

  • Lead with the ask or recommendation — boards hate buried leads
  • 3 slides max for a 30-min slot
  • Anticipate the 5 hardest questions and prepare answers
  • Use "We" for team achievements, "I" for decisions and accountability
  • End with: "Here's what I need from you"

Crisis communication:

  • Speed > perfection — communicate within 2 hours even with incomplete info
  • Structure: "Here's what we know. Here's what we're doing. Here's when we'll update you."
  • Take ownership: "I take responsibility for..."
  • Never say "no comment" — say "I'll have more information by [time]"
  • Follow up when promised — credibility is rebuilt in the follow-through

Difficult conversations:

  • Name the elephant: "This is a hard conversation. I want to have it because I respect you."
  • SBI model: Situation → Behavior → Impact (not character)
  • Ask their perspective before prescribing
  • End with explicit commitment: "What are we agreeing to?"
  • Follow up within 48 hours

Phase 7: Team Effectiveness

Team Health Assessment (Lencioni + Google's Project Aristotle)

team_assessment:
  psychological_safety: # "Can I take risks without feeling insecure?"
    score: 0 # 1-10
    signals:
      healthy: ["People admit mistakes", "Questions are welcomed", "Dissent is voiced"]
      unhealthy: ["Silence in meetings", "Blame culture", "CYA behavior"]
    actions:
      - "Leader models vulnerability: 'I was wrong about...' / 'I don't know'"
      - "Explicitly reward risk-taking, even when it fails"
      - "Ask the quietest person in the room: 'What are we missing?'"
      
  trust: # "Do I believe my teammates have my back?"
    score: 0
    signals:
      healthy: ["Candid feedback", "Asking for help", "Giving benefit of doubt"]
      unhealthy: ["Political maneuvering", "Back-channel conversations", "Guarded language"]
    actions:
      - "Personal histories exercise: 5-min vulnerability sharing in team meeting"
      - "Replace 'Why did you...' with 'Help me understand...'"
      - "Create shared experiences outside work context"
      
  healthy_conflict: # "Do we debate ideas openly?"
    score: 0
    signals:
      healthy: ["Passionate debate about ideas", "Quick resolution", "No lingering resentment"]
      unhealthy: ["Artificial harmony", "Passive-aggressive", "Decisions reopened privately"]
    actions:
      - "Assign devil's advocate role in meetings"
      - "Mining for conflict: 'We agreed too fast. What are we not considering?'"
      - "Norm: 'Disagree and commit' — debate fully, then align"
      
  commitment: # "Do we align on decisions and priorities?"
    score: 0
    signals:
      healthy: ["Clear priorities", "Fast decisions", "Unified external message"]
      unhealthy: ["Ambiguity about direction", "Revisiting decisions", "Hedging"]
    actions:
      - "End every meeting with: 'What did we decide? Who owns what? By when?'"
      - "Cascading communication: within 24 hours, everyone tells their teams"
      - "Write decisions down — 'If it's not written, it wasn't decided'"
      
  accountability: # "Do we hold each other to standards?"
    score: 0
    signals:
      healthy: ["Peer feedback flows freely", "Standards are clear", "Underperformance addressed"]
      unhealthy: ["Leader is sole accountability enforcer", "Low performers protected", "Resentment from high performers"]
    actions:
      - "Publish team commitments — transparency creates accountability"
      - "Peer feedback rounds in retrospectives"
      - "Score as a team: 'How did WE do against our commitments this quarter?'"
      
  results_focus: # "Do we prioritize collective results over individual?"
    score: 0
    signals:
      healthy: ["Shared goals", "Celebrating team wins", "Helping across boundaries"]
      unhealthy: ["Fiefdoms", "Individual credit-seeking", "Silo mentality"]
    actions:
      - "Shared OKRs that require collaboration"
      - "Recognition: praise what helps the team, not just individual brilliance"
      - "Quarterly: 'What did WE achieve?' before 'What did I achieve?'"

Team Offsite Design (Full Day)

team_offsite:
  pre_work:
    - "Anonymous pulse survey: 3 things working, 3 things not"
    - "Each person: 1-page 'State of my world' (priorities, blockers, requests)"
    - "Pre-read on strategic context"
    
  morning: # Connection + Retrospective
    - "09:00 Check-in: Personal + professional highlight since last offsite (10 min each)"
    - "10:00 Retrospective: What's working? What isn't? What should we change?"
    - "11:00 Team health assessment: Score and discuss each dimension"
    - "12:00 Lunch together (no laptops)"
    
  afternoon: # Strategy + Commitments
    - "13:30 Strategic context: Where is the business heading? What does it mean for us?"
    - "14:30 Priority alignment: What are our 3 must-win battles this quarter?"
    - "15:30 Working agreements: How do we want to work together? (revise/create)"
    - "16:30 Commitments: Each person — 'My commitment to this team'"
    - "17:00 Reflection + Close: 'One word for how you're leaving'"
    
  follow_up:
    - "Share notes within 48 hours"
    - "30-day check-in on commitments"
    - "Quarterly pulse survey to track health trends"

Phase 8: Career Transitions & Executive Onboarding

First 90 Days Framework (New Leader)

transition_plan:
  first_30_days: # LEARN
    theme: "Listen and learn — resist the urge to change things"
    actions:
      - "Meet every direct report 1:1 (60 min each)"
      - "Meet every peer and key stakeholder (30 min each)"
      - "Meet skip-levels in small groups"
      - "Learn the business: financials, customers, products, competitive landscape"
      - "Identify 3 quick wins — things you can fix that build credibility"
      - "DO NOT reorganize, fire anyone, or change processes yet"
    questions_to_ask_everyone:
      - "What's working well that I should protect?"
      - "What's broken that needs fixing?"
      - "What would you do if you had my role?"
      - "What don't I know that I should?"
      - "What are you worried I might do?"
      
  days_31_60: # ALIGN
    theme: "Form your point of view and align with stakeholders"
    actions:
      - "Present your diagnosis to your boss: 'Here's what I've learned'"
      - "Draft strategic priorities (3 max)"
      - "Identify talent: A-players (invest), B-players (develop), wrong-seat (move)"
      - "Execute quick wins — build credibility through action"
      - "Establish your team rhythms (meetings, 1:1s, reporting)"
      
  days_61_90: # ACT
    theme: "Make your mark — implement first meaningful changes"
    actions:
      - "Communicate your strategic priorities to the team"
      - "Make necessary people decisions (role changes, hiring, performance conversations)"
      - "Launch 1 signature initiative that signals your direction"
      - "90-day review with boss: 'Here's what I've done, here's what's next'"
      - "Adjust development plan based on what you've learned"
      
  common_traps:
    - "Trap: Bringing your old playbook. Fix: This is a new context — diagnose first."
    - "Trap: Trying to please everyone. Fix: You can't — make the hard calls."
    - "Trap: Going too fast. Fix: Trust takes time. Earn it before spending it."
    - "Trap: Going too slow. Fix: If you haven't made a visible change by Day 60, you've waited too long."
    - "Trap: Ignoring the culture. Fix: How things get done matters as much as what gets done."

Career Transition Coaching (Level Shifts)

TransitionKey Mindset ShiftCommon Failure Mode
IC → Manager"My success = their success"Doing the work instead of developing others
Manager → Director"Manage through managers"Skipping levels, micromanaging
Director → VP"Own the outcome, not the method"Getting pulled into tactical decisions
VP → C-Suite"Enterprise first, function second"Advocating only for your department
C-Suite → CEO"You are the culture"Underestimating symbolic power of every action
Corporate → Startup"Build the plane while flying it"Over-process, waiting for perfect information
Startup → Corporate"Influence > authority"Moving too fast, breaking things, ignoring politics

Phase 9: Succession Planning

Succession Readiness Assessment

succession_plan:
  critical_roles: # positions where vacancy = significant business risk
    - role: ""
      incumbent: ""
      flight_risk: "" # low/medium/high
      
      successors:
        ready_now: # could step in within 30 days
          - name: ""
            readiness: "" # percentage
            gaps: []
            development_plan: ""
            
        ready_1_2_years:
          - name: ""
            readiness: ""
            gaps: []
            development_plan: ""
            
        emergency_backup: # if incumbent leaves tomorrow
          name: ""
          plan: "" # what happens day 1

  bench_strength_score:
    roles_with_ready_now_successor: 0
    roles_with_1_2_year_successor: 0
    roles_with_no_successor: 0
    overall_readiness: "" # strong/adequate/at-risk/critical

  actions:
    - "Review succession plan quarterly"
    - "Give successors stretch assignments aligned to gaps"
    - "Cross-train across functions"
    - "Engage external search firms for critical roles with no internal successor"

9-Box Talent Assessment

                    Low Performance    Medium Performance    High Performance
High Potential    │ Potential Gem     │ High Potential       │ Star
                  │ Invest or move    │ Accelerate dev       │ Stretch & retain
                  │─────────────────── ──────────────────── ────────────────────
Medium Potential  │ Underperformer    │ Core Player          │ High Performer
                  │ PIP or redeploy   │ Develop in role      │ Expand scope
                  │─────────────────── ──────────────────── ────────────────────
Low Potential     │ Wrong Seat        │ Solid Contributor    │ Mastery Expert
                  │ Exit              │ Maintain             │ Leverage expertise

Calibration rules:

  • Never rate more than 20% as "Stars" — that's grade inflation
  • "Wrong Seat" requires action within 90 days — don't hoard
  • "Potential Gem" gets maximum 6 months to show improvement
  • "Core Players" are the backbone — don't neglect them chasing stars
  • Review the 9-box quarterly, recalibrate annually

Phase 10: Coaching Metrics & ROI

Coaching Effectiveness Dashboard

coaching_metrics:
  engagement_health:
    sessions_completed: 0
    sessions_cancelled: 0
    completion_rate: "" # target: >90%
    commitment_completion_rate: "" # actions taken / actions committed
    
  behavioral_change: # measured at 30/60/90 days
    self_reported_progress: "" # 1-10
    stakeholder_observed_change: "" # 1-10 (from sponsor/HR)
    360_score_change: "" # delta from baseline
    
  business_impact:
    team_engagement_delta: "" # survey score change
    retention_of_direct_reports: "" # 12-month retention rate
    team_performance_metrics: "" # revenue, NPS, delivery, etc.
    promotion_readiness: "" # is leader closer to next level?
    
  roi_calculation:
    coaching_investment: 0 # total cost (coach fee + leader time)
    value_created: 0 # estimated from retention + performance + averted risks
    roi_percentage: "" # (value - cost) / cost × 100
    
  qualitative:
    leader_testimonial: ""
    sponsor_assessment: ""
    most_significant_change: ""

ROI Evidence Types

EvidenceHow to MeasureTypical Impact
Retention of key talentDirect reports who stay vs baseline$50K-200K saved per retained person
Faster decision-makingTime from problem to decisionCompetitive advantage, speed to market
Team productivityOutput metrics, velocity, revenue per head10-30% improvement common
Reduced conflictTime spent on interpersonal issues2-5 hours/week reclaimed
Better stakeholder relationshipsNPS, 360° scores, sponsor feedbackUnlocks resources, removes blockers
Succession strengthInternal promotion rate, bench depth$100K+ saved per avoided external hire
Leader wellbeingBurnout indicators, engagement, tenurePrevents $500K+ executive turnover cost

Phase 11: Difficult Coaching Scenarios

5 Challenging Client Playbooks

1. The Resistant Leader ("I don't need coaching")

- Don't argue — meet them where they are
- Ask: "What would make this time worthwhile for you?"
- Reframe: "Think of this as a strategic thinking partner, not remediation"
- Find their motivation: "What would you like to be even better at?"
- Quick win: Solve one problem they care about → credibility earned

2. The Over-Talker (fills every session, avoids depth)

- Notice the pattern: "I notice we cover a lot of ground but don't go deep. What's that about?"
- Use structured tools: "Give me 3 bullet points, then we'll explore the most important one"
- Direct interrupt: "I want to stop you here because something important just came up"
- Assign reflective pre-work: "Come to our next session with one question you don't know the answer to"

3. The Perfectionist (paralyzed by standards)

- Normalize: "Your high standards got you here. AND they might be the ceiling now"
- Reframe: "What's the cost of waiting for perfect?"
- Experiment: "Ship one thing at 80% this week. Observe what happens"
- Identity work: "You ARE successful even when something isn't perfect"
- Track: Log the outcome of 80% efforts vs 100% efforts — data beats fear

4. The Pleaser (avoids conflict, overcommits)

- Name the pattern: "You seem to say yes to everything. What's driving that?"
- Explore the cost: "What are you sacrificing by never saying no?"
- Practice: Role-play declining a request — start with low-stakes
- Reframe: "Every yes to someone else is a no to something you care about"
- Assignment: Say no once this week. Report back on what happened (usually nothing bad)

5. The Brilliant Jerk (delivers results, damages people)

- Don't lead with behavior — lead with impact: "Your team's attrition is 2x the company average. What's your theory?"
- Connect to their goals: "You want to be VP. VPs need organizations that scale. People leave you."
- Specific incidents: "In the meeting Tuesday, when you said X, here's what happened..."
- Not optional: "This isn't about being nice. It's about whether you can lead at the next level"
- Consequences: "Without change, here's the likely outcome in 12 months..."

When to End a Coaching Engagement

SignalAction
No progress after 3-4 sessionsDirect conversation: "What's getting in the way?"
Leader not completing commitmentsRenegotiate or end — don't waste time
Goals achievedCelebrate and close with transition plan
Coaching becomes therapyRefer to professional — this is a boundary
Trust broken (leader lied, ethics issue)Address directly — may need to end
Organization changes (reorg, exit)Reassess scope and goals

Phase 12: Scoring & Quality

100-Point Coaching Quality Rubric

DimensionWeightScoring Guide
Assessment depth1515=comprehensive 360°+self+stakeholder, 10=basic assessment, 5=surface only
Goal clarity1515=SMART goals tied to business impact, 10=general goals, 5=vague aspirations
Conversation quality2020=powerful questions+challenge+insight, 15=good questions, 10=advice-giving, 5=chat
Development plan1515=70-20-10 with milestones+metrics, 10=action list, 5=vague intentions
Behavioral change1515=stakeholders report visible change, 10=self-reported change, 5=no change
Stakeholder management1010=sponsor engaged+aligned, 7=occasional updates, 3=forgotten
ROI evidence1010=quantified business impact, 7=qualitative evidence, 3=anecdotal only

Total: /100

  • 90-100: Transformative coaching engagement
  • 75-89: Strong impact, well-executed
  • 60-74: Good start, needs deeper follow-through
  • Below 60: Rethink approach — something isn't working

10 Coaching Anti-Patterns

  1. Advice monster — Telling instead of asking. Coach ≠ consultant.
  2. Friendship drift — Sessions become chat. Maintain productive tension.
  3. Avoiding the hard stuff — Skating around derailers. Name them.
  4. Working harder than the client — If you're more invested, something's wrong.
  5. Confirmation bias — Only hearing what confirms your hypothesis. Listen for surprise.
  6. Rescuing — Solving their problems instead of building their capability.
  7. Tool addiction — Running assessments instead of having real conversations.
  8. Ignoring the system — Coaching the individual while ignoring the context they're in.
  9. No measurement — Can't articulate what changed. Track from day 1.
  10. Endless engagement — No defined end. Coaching should have a graduation.

Natural Language Commands

The agent responds to commands like:

  • "Assess [leader name]'s leadership" → Run Phase 1 assessment
  • "Design a 360° survey for [name]" → Generate Phase 2 survey
  • "Set up a coaching engagement" → Walk through Phase 3 design
  • "Coach me on [topic]" → Run a GROW coaching conversation
  • "Create a development plan for [name]" → Generate Phase 5 plan
  • "Help me build executive presence" → Phase 6 framework
  • "Assess my team's health" → Phase 7 team assessment
  • "Plan my first 90 days" → Phase 8 transition plan
  • "Build a succession plan" → Phase 9 template
  • "Review coaching effectiveness" → Phase 10 dashboard
  • "Help me with a difficult leader" → Phase 11 scenario playbook
  • "Score this coaching engagement" → Phase 12 rubric

平台分布

OpenClaw

92.03%
按下载量换算4,558

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills