Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

afrexai-data-governance(Afrexai 数据治理)

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

afrexai-data-governance 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 6,903。

总安装 20,563周安装 840GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 6,653核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-data-governance(Afrexai 数据治理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-data-governance
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-data-governance
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-data-governance

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

afrexai-data-governance 用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常或生成统计口径。通过 openclaw skills install afrexai-data-governance 命令安装。

使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据时应先确认脱敏边界。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install afrexai-data-governance;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

afrexai-data-governance 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install afrexai-data-governance。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

afrexai-data-governance 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

afrexai-data-governance 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

afrexai-data-governance 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

afrexai-data-governance 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 20,563 次,近一周安装 840 次,下载 6,653 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

afrexai-data-governance 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
afrexai-data-governance

Afrexai 数据治理 · 本页

20,563—需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Data Governance Framework

Assess, score, and remediate your organization's data governance posture across 6 domains.

What This Covers

  1. Data Quality — Completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness scoring
  2. Data Cataloging — Asset inventory, lineage tracking, metadata management
  3. Access Control — Role-based permissions, least privilege, data classification (public/internal/confidential/restricted)
  4. Compliance Mapping — GDPR, CCPA, SOX, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, industry-specific regulations
  5. Retention & Lifecycle — Retention policies, archival schedules, deletion procedures, legal hold
  6. AI/Agent Data Governance — Training data provenance, model input/output logging, bias detection, PII handling in agent workflows

How to Use

When asked to assess data governance:

  1. Ask which domains are priority (or assess all 6)
  2. For each domain, evaluate 8 controls on a 0-3 scale:

- 0 = Not implemented - 1 = Ad hoc / informal - 2 = Documented and partially enforced - 3 = Automated and continuously monitored

  1. Calculate domain score (sum / 24 × 100)
  2. Calculate overall governance score (average of domains)
  3. Generate remediation roadmap prioritized by risk

Scoring Interpretation

ScoreRatingAction
0-25%CriticalImmediate remediation — regulatory risk
26-50%Developing90-day improvement plan required
51-75%ManagedOptimize and automate weak areas
76-100%OptimizedMaintain and benchmark against peers

Domain 1: Data Quality Controls

  1. Data profiling automation (duplicate detection, format validation)
  2. Quality dashboards with SLA thresholds
  3. Root cause analysis for quality failures
  4. Stewardship program (assigned data owners per domain)
  5. Quality gates in data pipelines (reject bad data at ingestion)
  6. Business rule validation (domain-specific logic checks)
  7. Cross-system reconciliation (source vs target matching)
  8. Quality trend tracking (month-over-month improvement metrics)

Domain 2: Data Cataloging Controls

  1. Automated asset discovery (databases, APIs, files, SaaS)
  2. Business glossary with agreed definitions
  3. Data lineage tracking (source → transformation → consumption)
  4. Search and discovery interface for business users
  5. Metadata enrichment (tags, classifications, sensitivity labels)
  6. Catalog coverage tracking (% of assets documented)
  7. Usage analytics (who accesses what, how often)
  8. Integration with BI/analytics tools (catalog-aware queries)

Domain 3: Access Control

  1. Role-based access control (RBAC) with regular review
  2. Data classification enforcement (labels drive permissions)
  3. Least privilege principle (minimal default access)
  4. Access request and approval workflows
  5. Privileged access management (admin accounts monitored)
  6. Access certification (quarterly re-certification of permissions)
  7. Anomaly detection (unusual access patterns flagged)
  8. De-provisioning automation (access removed on role change/exit)

Domain 4: Compliance Mapping

  1. Regulation inventory (which laws apply, by geography and industry)
  2. Control-to-regulation mapping (which controls satisfy which requirements)
  3. Data processing records (Article 30 GDPR / equivalent)
  4. Consent management (capture, storage, withdrawal tracking)
  5. Data subject rights automation (access, deletion, portability)
  6. Cross-border transfer compliance (SCCs, adequacy decisions)
  7. Breach notification procedures (72-hour GDPR, state-specific)
  8. Regular compliance audits (internal + third-party)

Domain 5: Retention & Lifecycle

  1. Retention schedule by data type (contractual, regulatory, operational)
  2. Automated archival pipelines (hot → warm → cold → delete)
  3. Legal hold management (litigation preservation)
  4. Deletion verification (confirmed purge with audit trail)
  5. Storage cost optimization (tiered storage aligned to access patterns)
  6. Backup and recovery testing (regular restore drills)
  7. Data minimization enforcement (collect only what is needed)
  8. End-of-life procedures for decommissioned systems

Domain 6: AI/Agent Data Governance

  1. Training data provenance tracking (source, consent, bias review)
  2. Model input/output logging (what went in, what came out)
  3. PII detection and masking in agent workflows
  4. Hallucination monitoring (output accuracy validation)
  5. Agent decision audit trail (explainability for automated decisions)
  6. Data feedback loops (human review of agent data modifications)
  7. Vendor data sharing agreements (what third-party APIs see your data)
  8. Synthetic data policies (when and how to use generated data)

Cost of Poor Governance

RiskAverage CostPrevention Cost
GDPR fine$4.3M (average 2025)$45K-$120K/year
Data breach$4.88M (IBM 2025)$60K-$200K/year
Failed audit$150K-$500K remediation$30K-$80K/year
Bad data decisions15-25% revenue impact$20K-$60K/year
AI bias incident$2M-$50M (litigation + brand)$25K-$75K/year

Remediation Priority Matrix

Always fix in this order:

  1. Compliance gaps — regulatory fines are existential
  2. Access control — breaches destroy trust overnight
  3. AI governance — fastest-growing risk category
  4. Data quality — garbage in = garbage out at scale
  5. Cataloging — you cannot govern what you cannot find
  6. Retention — storage costs compound, legal risk accumulates

Industry Benchmarks (2026)

IndustryAvg Governance ScoreTop QuartileRegulatory Pressure
Financial Services68%85%+Extreme (SOX, PCI, GDPR)
Healthcare62%80%+High (HIPAA, FDA, state)
SaaS/Tech55%78%+Growing (SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA)
Manufacturing45%70%+Moderate (ITAR, ISO)
Retail/Ecommerce48%72%+Growing (PCI, CCPA, GDPR)

Next Steps

Need a complete data governance implementation tailored to your industry?

平台分布

OpenClaw

75.77%
按下载量换算5,041

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills