Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

afrexai-construction-estimator(Afrexai 施工估算器)

afrexai-construction-estimator 用于补充开发相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接开发相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

afrexai-construction-estimator 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为执行命令;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 1,419。

总安装 30,223周安装 1,285GitHub Stars 2下载 10,588核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:afrexai-construction-estimator(Afrexai 施工估算器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/1kalin/afrexai-construction-estimator
安装命令:
openclaw skills install afrexai-construction-estimator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install afrexai-construction-estimator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

Afrexai Construction Estimator 管理施工项目成本估算与投标报价全流程。适用于建筑工程、装修工程与基础设施项目投资决策支持。集成材料价格数据库与工时标准,提升报价准确性。输入工程量需现场实测核实,避免图纸误差导致预算失真。变更订单应建立审批流程,防止随意追加预算失控。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install afrexai-construction-estimator;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

afrexai-construction-estimator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install afrexai-construction-estimator。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

afrexai-construction-estimator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

afrexai-construction-estimator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 openclaw skills install afrexai-construction-estimator 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

afrexai-construction-estimator 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

afrexai-construction-estimator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 30,223 次,近一周安装 1,285 次,下载 10,588 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

afrexai-construction-estimator 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
afrexai-construction-estimator

Afrexai 施工估算器 · 本页

30,2232执行命令MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
afrexai-construction-estimator
description
Complete construction estimating and cost management system. Use when preparing project estimates, bid proposals, cost breakdowns, value engineering, change order management, or construction budget tracking. Covers residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Trigger on 'estimate', 'construction cost', 'bid', 'takeoff', 'cost breakdown', 'change order', 'value engineering', 'construction budget', 'unit pricing', 'RSMeans'.

Construction Estimator Pro

Complete construction estimating methodology — from quantity takeoff to bid submission. Zero dependencies.

Phase 1: Project Classification & Estimate Type

Estimate Type Decision Matrix

Project StageEstimate TypeAccuracyBasisUse Case
ConceptOrder of Magnitude-30% to +50%SF/unit costsGo/no-go decisions
SchematicConceptual/Budget-15% to +30%Assembly costsBudget approval
Design DevDetailed-10% to +15%Quantity takeoffGMP/bid preparation
Construction DocsDefinitive/Bid-5% to +10%Full QTO + subsLump sum bid
ConstructionControlActual costsCommitted + forecastCost management

Project Brief YAML

project:
  name: ""
  number: ""
  type: residential | commercial | industrial | infrastructure | renovation
  delivery: design-bid-build | design-build | CM-at-risk | IPD
  location:
    city: ""
    state: ""
    zip: ""
    location_factor: 1.00  # RSMeans city cost index / national average
  owner: ""
  architect: ""
  
scope:
  gross_sf: 0
  stories: 0
  site_acres: 0
  description: ""
  
schedule:
  bid_date: ""
  construction_start: ""
  substantial_completion: ""
  duration_months: 0
  
estimate:
  type: order-of-magnitude | conceptual | detailed | definitive
  base_date: ""  # Date costs are based on
  escalation_rate: 0.04  # Annual construction cost escalation
  
assumptions:
  - ""
exclusions:
  - ""
allowances:
  - item: ""
    amount: 0

Project Type Quick Reference

TypeKey ConsiderationsTypical $/SF Range (2024-2026)
Single Family ResidentialFoundation type, finishes grade, energy code$150-$400/SF
Multi-FamilyUnit mix, parking ratio, amenities$200-$450/SF
Office (Class A)Curtain wall, MEP density, TI allowance$250-$550/SF
RetailShell vs TI, storefront, grease traps$150-$350/SF
Healthcare/HospitalLife safety, med gas, shielding$400-$900/SF
K-12 EducationPrevailing wage, hazmat, phasing$300-$600/SF
Warehouse/DistributionClear height, slab flatness, dock count$80-$180/SF
HotelStar rating drives finish, FF&E budget$200-$500/SF
Infrastructure (road/mile)Soil conditions, utilities, traffic control$2M-$10M/mile

Phase 2: Quantity Takeoff (QTO)

CSI MasterFormat Division Structure

Use CSI MasterFormat 2018 for ALL estimates. Every line item maps to a division.

DivisionNameTypical % of Total
01General Requirements8-12%
02Existing Conditions1-5%
03Concrete8-15%
04Masonry2-6%
05Metals (Structural Steel)8-15%
06Wood, Plastics, Composites3-8%
07Thermal & Moisture Protection4-8%
08Openings (Doors/Windows)3-7%
09Finishes8-15%
10Specialties1-3%
11Equipment1-5%
12Furnishings1-5%
13Special Construction0-3%
14Conveying Equipment (Elevators)1-4%
21Fire Suppression2-4%
22Plumbing4-8%
23HVAC8-15%
26Electrical8-15%
27Communications1-3%
28Electronic Safety & Security1-3%
31Earthwork3-8%
32Exterior Improvements2-6%
33Utilities2-5%

QTO Best Practices

  1. Measure twice, price once — QTO errors cascade through the entire estimate
  2. Use consistent units — SF for areas, LF for linear, CY for volume, EA for items
  3. Add waste factors by material:

- Concrete: 5-8% - Masonry: 3-5% - Drywall: 10-12% - Roofing: 8-10% - Flooring (tile): 10-15% - Lumber: 8-10% - Rebar: 5-7% - Paint: 10-15%

  1. Document measurement methodology — so anyone can verify
  2. Cross-check totals — SF of drywall ≈ 2.5-3x floor area (both sides of walls + ceilings)

QTO Line Item Template

line_item:
  division: "03"
  spec_section: "03 30 00"
  description: "Cast-in-Place Concrete - Elevated Slabs"
  quantity: 450
  unit: CY
  unit_cost:
    labor: 85.00
    material: 165.00
    equipment: 25.00
    subcontractor: 0.00
  total_unit_cost: 275.00
  extended_cost: 123750.00
  waste_factor: 0.07
  adjusted_quantity: 481.5
  notes: "4500 PSI, #5 rebar @ 12\" OC EW, 6\" slab"
  source: "Sub quote - ABC Concrete (02/15/2026)"
  confidence: high | medium | low

Quantity Verification Cross-Checks

CheckFormulaFlag If
Concrete per SFTotal CY ÷ Building SF>0.15 CY/SF (unless heavy structure)
Steel per SFTotal tons ÷ Building SF>15 PSF (unless high-rise)
Drywall SFTotal drywall SF ÷ Floor SF<2.0 or >4.0 ratio
Electrical per SFElectrical $ ÷ Building SF>$35/SF (standard office)
Plumbing fixturesCount vs occupancyMissing fixtures for code compliance
Parking spacesPer local code requirementsBelow minimum ratio

Phase 3: Pricing & Cost Assembly

Unit Cost Development

Cost source hierarchy (most reliable first):

  1. Subcontractor quotes (3 minimum per trade) — best for bid estimates
  2. Historical project data — adjusted for location, time, scope
  3. RSMeans/Gordian data — industry standard reference
  4. Vendor quotes — for specific materials/equipment
  5. Published cost guides — Marshall & Swift, Craftsman

Labor Cost Build-Up

labor_rate_build_up:
  trade: "Carpenter"
  base_wage: 42.50
  fringe_benefits: 18.75   # Health, pension, vacation, training
  payroll_taxes: 8.90      # FICA, FUTA, SUTA, workers comp
  total_burden: 27.65
  burdened_rate: 70.15
  
  productivity_factors:
    weather: 1.00           # 1.0 = normal, 1.15 = winter
    overtime: 1.00          # 1.0 = straight time, 1.5 = OT
    height: 1.00            # 1.0 = ground, 1.10 = >30ft
    congestion: 1.00        # 1.0 = open, 1.15 = tight
    shift: 1.00             # 1.0 = day, 1.10 = swing, 1.15 = night
  adjusted_rate: 70.15

Subcontractor Quote Evaluation

Score each sub quote (use minimum 3 per trade):

FactorWeight1-5 Score
Price competitiveness30%
Scope completeness (covers all spec sections?)25%
Qualifications/exclusions (red flags?)20%
Past performance/reputation15%
Bond capacity/insurance10%
Weighted Total100%

Red flags in sub quotes:

  • "As needed" or "TBD" line items (scope gap)
  • Short validity period (<30 days)
  • Unusual exclusions (e.g., electrician excluding wire)
  • No reference to spec sections
  • Price significantly below others (they missed something)

Crew Rate Assembly

Crew Daily Cost = Σ(Workers × Daily Rate) + Equipment Daily Cost
Crew Daily Output = Units per 8-hour day (from labor standards)
Unit Cost = Crew Daily Cost ÷ Crew Daily Output

Example — Concrete Placement Crew:

  • 1 Foreman @ $75/hr × 8 = $600
  • 4 Laborers @ $55/hr × 8 = $1,760
  • 1 Vibrator operator @ $60/hr × 8 = $480
  • Concrete pump (daily rental) = $1,200
  • Crew Daily Cost = $4,040
  • Daily output: 50 CY
  • Unit Labor+Equipment Cost = $80.80/CY
  • Material (concrete delivered) = $165/CY
  • Total in-place cost = $245.80/CY

Phase 4: Indirect Costs & Markups

General Conditions (Division 01) Checklist

ItemDuration-Based?Typical Range
Project ManagerYes$12K-$18K/month
SuperintendentYes$10K-$16K/month
Project EngineerYes$8K-$12K/month
Field Office (trailer)Yes$1K-$3K/month
Temporary utilitiesYes$2K-$5K/month
Temporary toiletsYes$200-$500/month each
Dumpsters/waste removalYes$1K-$4K/month
Safety equipment/suppliesYes$500-$2K/month
Small tools & consumablesLump1-2% of labor
Final cleaningLump$0.15-$0.50/SF
Permits (building)LumpVaries by jurisdiction
Insurance (Builder's Risk)Lump0.5-1.5% of cost
Performance/Payment BondLump1-3% of contract
Testing & inspectionLump0.5-1.5% of cost
As-built documentationLump$5K-$25K
Commissioning supportLump$10K-$50K

Rule of thumb: General conditions = 8-15% of direct costs (lower for large projects, higher for small/complex).

Markup Stack

markup_calculation:
  direct_costs: 2500000
  
  general_conditions:
    percentage: 0.10
    amount: 250000
    
  subtotal_1: 2750000
  
  overhead:
    percentage: 0.05     # Home office overhead
    amount: 137500
    
  subtotal_2: 2887500
  
  profit:
    percentage: 0.05     # Varies by market/risk
    amount: 144375
    
  subtotal_3: 3031875
  
  contingency:
    design_contingency: 0.05    # For incomplete drawings
    construction_contingency: 0.03  # For unforeseen conditions
    amount: 242550
    
  bond:
    percentage: 0.015
    amount: 49118
    
  escalation:
    rate: 0.04           # Annual
    months_to_midpoint: 8
    amount: 88536
    
  total_estimate: 3412079
  cost_per_sf: 341.21    # For 10,000 SF building

Contingency Guide

Estimate TypeDesign ContingencyConstruction Contingency
Order of Magnitude15-25%10-15%
Conceptual10-15%5-10%
Detailed3-8%3-5%
Definitive/Bid0-3%2-3%

Contingency is NOT profit padding. Track and justify every contingency draw.


Phase 5: Bid Preparation & Strategy

Bid/No-Bid Decision Scorecard

Score 1-5 for each (minimum 30 to bid):

FactorWeightScore
Project type experience3x
Client relationship/history2x
Current workload capacity3x
Geographic fit2x
Profit potential3x
Competition level (fewer = better)2x
Risk profile (lower = better)3x
Schedule feasibility2x
Bonding capacity available2x
Weighted Total/110

Bid Day Checklist

48 hours before:

  • [ ] All sub quotes received (minimum 3 per trade)
  • [ ] All material quotes current (check expiration dates)
  • [ ] Addenda reviewed and incorporated (ALL of them)
  • [ ] Scope gaps identified and plugged
  • [ ] Math verified (independent check)

Day of bid:

  • [ ] Final sub quotes plugged in
  • [ ] Markup/profit decision finalized
  • [ ] Alternates priced if required
  • [ ] Unit prices calculated if required
  • [ ] Bid bond secured
  • [ ] Bid form completed correctly (every blank filled)
  • [ ] Acknowledge ALL addenda on bid form
  • [ ] Authorized signature
  • [ ] Delivered before deadline (allow 1+ hour buffer)

Competitive Bid Strategy

Market conditions affect markup:

  • Hot market (lots of work): Markup 8-12% (O&P combined)
  • Normal market: Markup 6-10%
  • Slow market: Markup 3-6%
  • Must-win/strategic: Markup 2-4% (minimum to cover overhead)

Bid spread analysis (track your results):

Bid Spread = (Your Bid - Low Bid) ÷ Low Bid × 100
  • Consistently >10% high → Your costs are inflated or productivity assumptions too conservative
  • Consistently <2% from low → You might be leaving money on the table
  • Target: Within 3-5% of winning bid

Phase 6: Value Engineering (VE)

VE Opportunity Matrix

SystemVE OpportunityTypical SavingsRisk Level
StructuralSteel vs concrete frame5-15% of structureMedium
FoundationsSpread vs mat vs piles10-30% of foundationHigh (geotech dependent)
EnvelopeCurtain wall vs storefront15-30% of facadeLow-Medium
RoofingTPO vs modified bitumen10-20% of roofingLow
MechanicalVAV vs VRF10-25% of HVACMedium
ElectricalLED fixtures, panel optimization5-15% of electricalLow
FinishesMaterial substitutions10-40% of finishesLow
SiteReduce import/export of soil10-30% of siteworkMedium

VE Proposal Template

ve_item:
  number: VE-001
  description: "Substitute VRF system for conventional VAV"
  division: "23"
  
  original:
    description: "VAV air handling system with ductwork"
    cost: 850000
    
  proposed:
    description: "Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) with DOAS"
    cost: 680000
    
  savings: 170000
  savings_pct: 20%
  
  impact:
    schedule: "Reduces mechanical rough-in by 2 weeks"
    quality: "Better zone control, lower operating cost"
    maintenance: "Higher per-unit cost but less ductwork"
    code_compliance: "Meets ASHRAE 90.1, verify local amendments"
    
  risk: medium
  recommendation: accept | reject | modify
  requires_redesign: yes | no
  redesign_cost: 15000
  net_savings: 155000

VE Decision Rules

  1. Never VE life safety — fire protection, structural integrity, egress
  2. Calculate lifecycle cost — cheap upfront ≠ cheap over 20 years
  3. Get architect/engineer sign-off before bidding VE alternates
  4. Document everything — VE that isn't documented becomes a scope gap
  5. Owner decides — present options with data, let them choose

Phase 7: Change Order Management

Change Order Pricing Rules

Contractor markup on changes (typical):

TierSelf-Performed WorkSubcontractor Work
Overhead10%5%
Profit10%5%
BondAdd actual %Add actual %

Time & Material (T&M) documentation requirements:

  • Daily time sheets signed by owner's rep
  • Material invoices with delivery tickets
  • Equipment logs with hours
  • Photos of work in progress

Change Order YAML Template

change_order:
  number: CO-001
  date: ""
  description: ""
  
  reason:
    type: owner-directed | unforeseen-condition | design-error | code-change | scope-clarification
    rfi_number: ""
    
  cost_breakdown:
    labor:
      hours: 0
      rate: 0
      total: 0
    material:
      items: []
      total: 0
    equipment:
      items: []
      total: 0
    subcontractor:
      items: []
      total: 0
    direct_cost: 0
    markup: 0.15
    total_cost: 0
    
  schedule_impact:
    days: 0
    critical_path: yes | no
    explanation: ""
    
  status: pending | approved | rejected | negotiating

Change Order Negotiation Tips

  1. Price it immediately — delay weakens your position
  2. Submit with backup — labor rates, material quotes, productivity analysis
  3. Separate time from money — negotiate schedule impact independently
  4. Track cumulative impact — 20 small changes = major schedule disruption (even if each is "0 days")
  5. Constructive acceleration — if owner delays approval but expects same completion, document it
  6. Unit price book — agree on unit prices at contract start for common change types

Phase 8: Cost Control During Construction

Earned Value Management (EVM)

Budget at Completion (BAC) = Total budget
Planned Value (PV) = Budgeted cost of work scheduled
Earned Value (EV) = Budgeted cost of work performed
Actual Cost (AC) = Actual cost of work performed

Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = EV / PV
  >1.0 = ahead of schedule
  <1.0 = behind schedule

Cost Performance Index (CPI) = EV / AC
  >1.0 = under budget
  <1.0 = over budget

Estimate at Completion (EAC) = BAC / CPI
Variance at Completion (VAC) = BAC - EAC

Monthly Cost Report Template

cost_report:
  project: ""
  period: ""
  report_date: ""
  
  summary:
    original_contract: 0
    approved_changes: 0
    pending_changes: 0
    current_budget: 0
    committed_cost: 0      # Subcontracts + POs
    actual_cost_to_date: 0
    forecast_to_complete: 0
    estimate_at_completion: 0
    variance: 0
    contingency_remaining: 0
    
  schedule:
    percent_complete: 0
    spi: 0
    cpi: 0
    days_ahead_behind: 0
    
  cash_flow:
    billed_to_date: 0
    collected_to_date: 0
    retention_held: 0
    
  risk_items:
    - description: ""
      potential_cost: 0
      probability: high | medium | low
      mitigation: ""

Cost Control Red Flags

SignalWhat It MeansAction
CPI < 0.95 in first 25%Systemic cost overrunRoot cause analysis NOW
Contingency burn > schedule %Burning contingency too fastTighten change management
>5 pending COs unsignedCash flow risk, scope disputeEscalate to PM/owner
Sub invoices > committedSub performing extra workVerify scope, issue CO or stop work
Retainage release requests earlySub cash flow problemsMonitor closely, check lien waivers

Phase 9: Specialty Estimate Types

Renovation/Remodel Estimating

Add these factors to renovation estimates:

  • Selective demolition: Price item-by-item (never lump sum)
  • Hazmat survey: Asbestos ($3-5K), lead paint ($2-4K) — MANDATORY before bid
  • Abatement: 2-5x removal cost vs new construction equivalent
  • Protection of existing: Dust barriers, floor protection, HVAC isolation
  • Working hours: Occupied buildings = nights/weekends = premium labor
  • Discovery allowance: 10-15% for hidden conditions behind walls
  • Temporary facilities: HVAC, power, restrooms during renovation
  • Phasing/sequencing: Adds 15-30% management overhead

Sitework Estimating

Critical factors:

sitework_checklist:
  geotechnical:
    - Soil bearing capacity
    - Water table depth  
    - Rock depth (blasting vs mechanical?)
    - Contamination (Phase I/II ESA results)
    
  earthwork:
    cut_cy: 0
    fill_cy: 0
    import_export: 0    # Net CY to haul
    haul_distance_miles: 0
    compaction_required: standard | proctor_95 | proctor_98
    
  utilities:
    water_tap_fee: 0
    sewer_tap_fee: 0
    fire_line: 0
    storm_detention: required | not_required
    
  paving:
    asphalt_sy: 0
    concrete_sy: 0
    curb_lf: 0
    striping_lf: 0
    
  landscape:
    sod_sf: 0
    trees_ea: 0
    irrigation: yes | no
    erosion_control: silt_fence | inlet_protection | retention_pond

MEP (Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing) Quick Checks

System$/SF Benchmark (Commercial Office)Flag If
HVAC$25-$50/SF>$55 or <$20
Plumbing$12-$25/SF>$30 or <$8
Fire Protection$4-$8/SF>$10 or <$3
Electrical (power)$18-$35/SF>$40 or <$12
Low voltage/data$5-$12/SF>$15 or <$3
Total MEP$64-$130/SF>$150 or <$46

Phase 10: Escalation & Location Adjustments

Construction Cost Escalation

Future Cost = Current Cost × (1 + Annual Rate) ^ (Months to Midpoint ÷ 12)

Recent escalation trends (US):

  • 2020-2022: 8-15% annually (pandemic/supply chain)
  • 2023-2024: 4-6% annually (normalizing)
  • 2025-2026 forecast: 3-5% annually
  • Long-term average: 3-4% annually

Always escalate to the MIDPOINT of construction, not the start.

Location Factor Application

Local Cost = National Average Cost × City Cost Index

Sample RSMeans City Cost Indices (100 = national average):

CityIndexCityIndex
New York, NY130-145Dallas, TX88-95
San Francisco, CA125-140Atlanta, GA90-97
Boston, MA115-130Phoenix, AZ88-94
Chicago, IL110-120Denver, CO95-105
Seattle, WA108-118Nashville, TN88-95
Washington, DC100-110Charlotte, NC85-92
Miami, FL92-100Houston, TX85-93
Minneapolis, MN105-112Rural areas70-85

Phase 11: Estimate Quality Review

100-Point Estimate Quality Rubric

DimensionWeightCriteria
Scope completeness20All spec sections priced, no gaps, exclusions documented
Quantity accuracy20QTO verified, cross-checks pass, waste factors applied
Pricing basis153+ sub quotes per trade, current material prices, documented sources
Indirect costs10GCs detailed (not lump), schedule-based items tied to duration
Markup appropriateness10Market-competitive, risk-adjusted, contingency justified
Documentation10Assumptions listed, basis of estimate narrative, organized by division
Adjustments10Location factor applied, escalation to midpoint, seasonal factors
Presentation5Professional format, clear summary, alternates separated

Grading: 90+ = Bid-ready | 75-89 = Needs refinement | 60-74 = Major gaps | <60 = Redo

Peer Review Checklist

  • [ ] All addenda acknowledged and incorporated?
  • [ ] Spec sections cross-referenced to QTO? (no orphan specs)
  • [ ] Sub quotes match scope of work? (read exclusions!)
  • [ ] General conditions duration matches schedule?
  • [ ] Bond premium calculated on TOTAL including markups?
  • [ ] Sales tax applied correctly? (varies by state, some exempt)
  • [ ] Prevailing wage rates used if required? (Davis-Bacon, state)
  • [ ] Owner-furnished items excluded from pricing?
  • [ ] Alternates priced separately and clearly?
  • [ ] Math checked independently? (not just formula check — spot-check quantities)

Phase 12: Common Mistakes & Edge Cases

10 Estimate-Killing Mistakes

#MistakePrevention
1Missing addendaChecklist: log every addendum, initial when incorporated
2Incomplete sub scopeWrite scope sheets with inclusions AND exclusions
3Wrong labor ratesVerify union vs open shop, prevailing wage, location
4No escalationALWAYS escalate to construction midpoint
5Lump sum general conditionsDetail every line item tied to schedule
6Ignoring phasingMulti-phase = mobilize/demobilize multiple times
7Missing temporary workShoring, dewatering, winter protection, dust control
8Under-priced site conditionsGet geotech report BEFORE estimating foundations
9Scope gaps between tradesWho installs the backing for the TV mount?
10Not reading the fine printLiquidated damages, retainage, payment terms

Edge Cases

Occupied building renovation:

  • Work hours restriction → labor premium 15-40%
  • Dust/noise control → add $2-5/SF
  • Security/escort requirements → add supervision cost
  • Existing condition discovery → 10-15% allowance minimum

Remote/rural project:

  • Travel/per diem for crews → $150-$250/worker/day
  • Material delivery premium → 5-15% depending on distance
  • Limited sub market → fewer quotes, less competitive pricing
  • Equipment mobilization → long haul costs for cranes, excavators

Fast-track schedule:

  • Overtime premium → plan 20-30% labor cost increase
  • Acceleration costs → additional supervision, equipment
  • Out-of-sequence work → productivity losses 10-25%
  • Premium material delivery → expediting fees

Public/government work:

  • Prevailing wages → 20-40% labor cost increase
  • DBE/MBE/WBE goals → subcontracting requirements, good faith effort
  • Buy American/Buy America → material cost premium 10-30%
  • Bid protest risk → ensure perfect compliance with ITB

Design-Build:

  • Design contingency higher (incomplete docs at pricing)
  • Self-perform vs sub trade-offs
  • Design liability insurance (professional liability)
  • Allowances for owner decisions not yet made

Natural Language Commands

CommandAction
"Estimate this project"Run full estimate workflow from Phase 1
"Price [division/trade]"Develop unit costs for specific trade
"Check my quantities"Run QTO verification cross-checks
"Value engineer [system]"Generate VE alternatives with savings
"Write change order for [scope]"Generate CO with pricing and backup
"Compare sub quotes for [trade]"Score and compare subcontractor bids
"Monthly cost report"Generate EVM-based cost report
"Bid/no-bid analysis for [project]"Run decision scorecard
"Location adjust to [city]"Apply RSMeans location factor
"Escalate costs to [date]"Calculate escalation to future midpoint
"Review my estimate"Run 100-point quality rubric
"Generate bid summary"Format estimate for bid submission

平台分布

OpenClaw

79.83%
按下载量换算8,452

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 openclaw skills install afrexai-construction-estimator 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills