Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

aeo-geo(航空地理)

aeo-geo 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

aeo-geo 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,632。

总安装 643周安装 26GitHub Stars 67下载 202核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:aeo-geo(航空地理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro
仓库路径:skills/aeo-geo
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro --skill aeo-geo
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro --skill aeo-geo

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

AEO/GEO 智能模块用于优化品牌在 AI 生成答案中的可见性与引用表现。适用于提升品牌在被 ChatGPT、Perplexity、Claude 等平台引用的频率。支持 AI 可见性分析、实体一致性检查和知识图谱优化策略。安装前应核实来源仓库维护状态及是否涉及内容修改权限。

aeo-geo 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/aeo-geo

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

aeo-geo 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro --skill aeo-geo。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

aeo-geo 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

aeo-geo 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

aeo-geo 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

aeo-geo 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 643 次,近一周安装 26 次,下载 202 次,GitHub 67 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

aeo-geo 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
aeo-geo

航空地理 · 本页

64367只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

AEO/GEO Intelligence

When to Use This Skill

Activate this module when the user's request involves any of the following:

  • AI Visibility: Questions about how a brand, product, or person appears in AI-generated answers (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini, Claude)
  • Answer Engine Optimization (AEO): Optimizing content so it gets selected as a source for AI-generated answers
  • Generative Engine Optimization (GEO): Structuring content and entities so generative AI platforms accurately represent a brand
  • Citation Tracking: Monitoring which sources AI models cite when answering queries related to a brand or industry
  • Entity Consistency: Ensuring brand information is uniform across all knowledge sources that AI models train on or retrieve from
  • Knowledge Graph Optimization: Improving how a brand is represented in Google Knowledge Graph, Wikidata, and other structured knowledge bases
  • Structured Data for AI: Implementing schema markup and structured data specifically to improve AI comprehension and citation likelihood

Trigger phrases: "AI visibility," "how does ChatGPT describe my brand," "Perplexity results," "AI Overview optimization," "answer engine," "generative engine," "LLM optimization," "AI citations," "entity consistency," "Knowledge Graph"

Brand Context (Auto-Applied)

Before producing any marketing output from this module:

  1. Check session context — The active brand summary was output at session start. Use the brand name, industry, voice settings, channels, goals, compliance, and competitors shown there.
  2. If you need the full profile, read: ~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/profile.json
  3. Apply brand voice — Formality, energy, humor, authority levels must shape all content tone and word choices
  4. Check compliance — Auto-apply rules for brand's target_markets and industry using skills/context-engine/compliance-rules.md
  5. Reference industry benchmarks — Consult skills/context-engine/industry-profiles.md for the brand's industry
  6. Use platform specs — Reference skills/context-engine/platform-specs.md for character limits and format requirements
  7. Check campaign history — Run python campaign-tracker.py --brand {slug} --action list-campaigns before planning new work
  8. If no brand exists, say: "No brand profile found. Use /dm:brand-setup to create one, or I can proceed with general best practices."
  9. Check brand guidelines — If ~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/guidelines/_manifest.json exists, load and enforce: restrictions.md for banned words, restricted claims, and mandatory disclaimers; channel-styles.md for channel-specific tone overrides (may differ from base voice); messaging.md for approved key messages, taglines, and positioning language; voice-and-tone.md for detailed voice rules beyond the 4 numeric scores. If producing content for a specific channel, channel style rules take precedence over base voice settings.

Do not ask the user for information that already exists in their brand profile.

Required Context

Before executing AEO/GEO work, gather:

  1. Brand Identity: Official brand name, key products/services, unique value propositions, and brand positioning
  2. Current AI Footprint: Ask the user if they have tested how AI platforms currently describe their brand (or offer to audit)
  3. Target Queries: The questions and topics the brand wants to be cited for in AI-generated answers
  4. Existing Content Assets: Website URL, blog, knowledge base, Wikipedia presence, schema markup status
  5. Competitive Landscape: Key competitors who may already have strong AI visibility
  6. Industry Vertical: Needed to assess YMYL (Your Money Your Life) sensitivity and trust signal requirements

If the user cannot provide all context, proceed with what is available and flag gaps as recommendations.

Minimum viable context: Brand name and website URL. Everything else can be inferred or discovered during the audit process.

Capabilities

  • AI Visibility Audit: Systematic testing of how a brand appears across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Copilot for target queries
  • Citation Optimization: Restructuring content to maximize the probability of being cited as a source in AI-generated responses
  • Entity Consistency Audit: Cross-referencing brand information across Google Knowledge Graph, Wikidata, Wikipedia, Crunchbase, LinkedIn, and industry databases to identify inconsistencies
  • LLM Content Strategy: Creating content specifically designed to be ingested and accurately represented by language models
  • AI Answer Monitoring Framework: Setting up systematic tracking of AI mentions and citations over time
  • Structured Data for AI Citation: Implementing Organization, Product, FAQ, HowTo, and other schema types that improve AI comprehension
  • Knowledge Graph Optimization: Improving entity representation in structured knowledge bases
  • Topical Authority Mapping: Identifying content gaps that prevent a brand from being recognized as an authority by AI models
  • AI-First Content Formatting: Restructuring existing content with clear definitions, factual statements, and citation-worthy snippets
  • Competitive AI Visibility Benchmarking: Comparing brand AI presence against competitors across platforms

Process

Primary Workflow: AI Visibility Audit & Optimization

  1. Discovery & Baseline

- Collect brand details, target queries (10-25 queries), and competitor list - Document current schema markup, Knowledge Graph presence, and Wikipedia/Wikidata status - Identify the business model to determine which AI platforms matter most - Catalog existing authoritative content assets (whitepapers, research, data, expert bios) - Assess YMYL classification — brands in health, finance, or legal face higher authority thresholds

  1. AI Platform Testing

- For each target query, document how the brand appears (or fails to appear) on: - Google AI Overviews - ChatGPT (latest model) - Perplexity - Gemini - Microsoft Copilot - Score each result: Cited (direct mention with link), Referenced (mentioned without link), Absent, Misrepresented - Capture exact AI-generated text for each query as a baseline

  1. Entity Consistency Check

- Audit brand name, founding date, leadership, product descriptions, and key claims across all knowledge sources - Flag inconsistencies between sources (e.g., different founding years on Crunchbase vs. Wikipedia) - Prioritize fixes by source authority weight

  1. Gap Analysis & Strategy

- Identify patterns: Which query types yield citations? Which don't? - Map content gaps: What authoritative content is missing that AI models need? - Assess structured data gaps: What schema markup is missing or incorrect? - Benchmark against competitors who ARE getting cited

  1. Optimization Execution Plan

- Prioritized list of content to create or restructure - Schema markup implementation plan - Knowledge Graph correction/enhancement steps - Entity consistency fix checklist - Content formatting guidelines for AI-first optimization

  1. Monitoring & Iteration

- Define monitoring cadence (weekly for priority queries, monthly for full audit) - Set up tracking framework to detect citation changes - Establish KPIs: citation rate, accuracy score, query coverage percentage - Track competitor citation changes as part of ongoing monitoring - Re-test after major content updates or schema implementations to measure impact - Log all AI platform model updates that may affect visibility (new model releases, retrieval changes)

Secondary Workflow: Citation-Optimized Content Creation

  1. Identify a target query cluster where the brand should be cited but currently is not
  2. Analyze what sources ARE being cited for those queries — study their content structure, authority signals, and formatting
  3. Create or restructure content that surpasses cited sources in:

- Factual accuracy and specificity (include precise data, dates, numbers) - Clear definitional statements (AI models favor content with unambiguous definitions) - Structured formatting (clear headings, bullet points, tables that AI can parse) - Source credibility signals (author credentials, citations to primary research, organizational authority)

  1. Implement supporting schema markup (FAQ, HowTo, Article, Organization as appropriate)
  2. Build inbound authority signals (internal links from high-authority pages, external citations)
  3. Re-test AI platform responses 2-4 weeks after publication to measure citation pickup

Reference Files

  • ai-visibility-audit.md — Step-by-step audit methodology, scoring rubric, and platform-specific testing protocols
  • citation-optimization.md — Content restructuring techniques, citation-worthy formatting patterns, and source authority building
  • entity-consistency.md — Cross-platform entity audit checklist, Knowledge Graph optimization, Wikidata editing guidelines
  • llm-content-strategy.md — AI-first content creation framework, topical authority mapping, and structured data implementation guide

Output Formats

DeliverableFormatDescription
AI Visibility ScorecardTable/SpreadsheetQuery-by-query visibility scores across all AI platforms
Entity Consistency ReportDocumentAll inconsistencies found with correction instructions
AEO Content BriefDocumentContent creation/restructuring briefs optimized for AI citation
Schema Markup SpecCode snippets (JSON-LD)Ready-to-implement structured data markup
Monitoring Dashboard SpecDocumentKPIs, tracking methodology, and reporting cadence
Competitive AI Visibility MatrixTableSide-by-side comparison of brand vs. competitor AI visibility
LLM Content StrategyDocument90-day content plan focused on building AI authority

Edge Cases

Brand with Negative AI Perception

  • Situation: AI platforms are generating inaccurate or negative information about the brand
  • Approach: Prioritize entity consistency fixes and authoritative source correction before any content optimization. Create factual correction content on high-authority owned properties. Do NOT attempt to manipulate AI outputs directly — focus on fixing the underlying source material. Flag potential reputation management needs to the user.

New Brand with Zero AI Visibility

  • Situation: Brand does not appear in any AI-generated answers
  • Approach: Start with foundation-building — create a Wikipedia-worthy web presence (not necessarily Wikipedia itself), establish Wikidata entry, implement comprehensive schema markup, and build topical authority content. Set realistic timelines: AI model knowledge has lag times (weeks to months depending on platform).

Common-Word Brand Names

  • Situation: Brand name is a common word (e.g., "Apple," "Slack," "Monday")
  • Approach: Entity disambiguation is critical. Emphasize co-occurring terms, use full official names in structured data, ensure Knowledge Graph correctly disambiguates, and optimize content with entity-clarifying context. Always include industry/product qualifiers in target queries.

Multi-Brand Companies

  • Situation: Parent company with multiple sub-brands needing separate AI identities
  • Approach: Audit each brand entity separately. Ensure clear parent-child relationships in structured data. Avoid cannibalization where sub-brands compete with each other in AI answers. Create distinct topical authority for each brand.

Regional AI Engines (Baidu, Yandex)

  • Situation: User needs visibility on non-Western AI platforms
  • Approach: Acknowledge that optimization strategies differ significantly for Baidu (China) and Yandex (Russia). These require localized content, platform-specific structured data standards, and different knowledge bases. Recommend specialized regional expertise if the request goes deep. Provide general framework but flag limitations in specific platform knowledge.

YMYL Brands (Health, Finance, Legal)

  • Situation: Brands in Your Money Your Life categories face elevated trust requirements from AI platforms
  • Approach: AI platforms apply stricter source quality thresholds for YMYL topics. Prioritize: (1) Expert authorship with verifiable credentials on all content. (2) Citations to primary research, government sources, and peer-reviewed studies. (3) Medical/legal/financial review disclosures. (4) Comprehensive E-E-A-T signals (link to Digital PR module for authority building). (5) Schema markup that explicitly declares author qualifications and organizational credentials. Test AI outputs carefully for accuracy — misrepresentation in YMYL categories carries higher reputational risk.

Rapidly Evolving AI Landscape

  • Situation: AI platforms frequently update their models, retrieval methods, and citation behavior
  • Approach: Treat all AEO/GEO strategies as living processes, not one-time optimizations. Build monitoring into every engagement. When a major platform update occurs (new model release, retrieval system change, AI Overview format change), re-run the visibility audit for priority queries. Document observed behavior changes and update the workflow accordingly. Maintain a changelog of platform updates and their observed impact on brand visibility.

Related Skills

  • Content Engine — For creating and optimizing the actual content that drives AI citations
  • Analytics & Insights — For measuring AI visibility performance and tracking citation changes over time
  • Digital PR & Authority — For building the E-E-A-T signals and earned media that strengthen AI trust in a brand
  • Audience Intelligence — For understanding which queries your target audience is asking AI platforms

平台分布

Codex

34.18%
按下载量换算69

Claude

30.49%
按下载量换算62

Cursor

18.43%
按下载量换算37

Gemini CLI

8.8%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills