Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

adynato-githubadynato GitHub 问题管理

Agent Skill

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

总安装

250

周安装

10

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

81
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:adynato-github(adynato GitHub 问题管理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/adynato/skills
仓库路径:skills/adynato-github
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/adynato/skills --skill adynato-github
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/adynato/skills --skill adynato-github

简介

adynato-github 用于 GitHub 协作辅助,适合在 OpenClaw 中管理仓库和 PR 流程。

  • 它支持查询项目状态、创建堆叠 PR 和链接 Issue,提升协作效率。
  • 使用时需区分只读查询和写入操作,确认 token 权限和仓库范围。
  • 涉及推送分支或修改 Issue 时,应获得用户授权并验证目标仓库。
  • 建议结合原始文档了解堆叠 PR 策略和视觉变更证明要求。

SKILL.md

GitHub Skill

Use this skill when working with GitHub on Adynato projects.

Always Use gh CLI

Use the gh CLI for all GitHub operations instead of the web interface:

# Create PR
gh pr create --title "Title" --body "Description"

# View PR
gh pr view 123

# Check PR status
gh pr checks 123

# Merge PR
gh pr merge 123 --squash

PR Descriptions

Every PR must have a thorough description. Use this template:

gh pr create --title "feat: add user authentication" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary

Brief description of what this PR does and why.

- Added JWT-based authentication flow
- Implemented login/logout endpoints
- Added auth middleware for protected routes

## Changes

- `lib/auth.ts` - Auth utilities and token management
- `app/api/auth/login/route.ts` - Login endpoint
- `app/api/auth/logout/route.ts` - Logout endpoint
- `middleware.ts` - Route protection

## Testing

- [ ] Login with valid credentials returns token
- [ ] Login with invalid credentials returns 401
- [ ] Protected routes reject unauthenticated requests
- [ ] Logout invalidates token

## Screenshots

(if UI changes)

## Related

- Closes #123
- Part of #456
EOF
)"

Required Sections

SectionWhen RequiredPurpose
SummaryAlwaysWhat and why in 2-3 sentences
ChangesAlwaysList of files/areas modified
TestingAlwaysHow to verify it works
ScreenshotsUI changesVisual proof of changes
RelatedIf applicableLinked issues/PRs

Stacked PRs

For large deliverables, break work into small, stacked PRs that build on each other.

Why Stack PRs

  • Easier review - Reviewers can focus on one concern at a time
  • Faster merges - Small PRs get approved faster
  • Lower risk - Each PR is independently deployable
  • Better history - Clear progression of changes

Stacking Strategy

For a feature like "Add user dashboard":

PR 1: Add user API endpoints (base)
  ↓
PR 2: Add dashboard data fetching (stacked on PR 1)
  ↓
PR 3: Add dashboard UI components (stacked on PR 2)
  ↓
PR 4: Add dashboard tests (stacked on PR 3)

Creating Stacked PRs

# PR 1: Base branch
git checkout -b feat/user-api
# ... make changes ...
git push -u origin feat/user-api
gh pr create --base main --title "feat: add user API endpoints"

# PR 2: Stack on PR 1
git checkout -b feat/dashboard-data feat/user-api
# ... make changes ...
git push -u origin feat/dashboard-data
gh pr create --base feat/user-api --title "feat: add dashboard data fetching"

# PR 3: Stack on PR 2
git checkout -b feat/dashboard-ui feat/dashboard-data
# ... make changes ...
git push -u origin feat/dashboard-ui
gh pr create --base feat/dashboard-data --title "feat: add dashboard UI"

Stack Description

In stacked PRs, note the relationship:

## Summary

Adds dashboard UI components.

## Stack

This PR is part of a stack:
1. #101 - Add user API endpoints ← **merged**
2. #102 - Add dashboard data fetching ← **base**
3. **#103 - Add dashboard UI** ← you are here
4. #104 - Add dashboard tests

Please review and merge in order.

Updating Stacked PRs

When the base PR changes:

# Update your branch with changes from base
git checkout feat/dashboard-ui
git rebase feat/dashboard-data
git push --force-with-lease

When base PR merges:

# Rebase onto new base
git checkout feat/dashboard-data
git rebase main
git push --force-with-lease

# Update PR base branch
gh pr edit 102 --base main

PR Size Guidelines

SizeLines ChangedReview TimeRecommendation
XS< 50MinutesIdeal
S50-200< 1 hourGood
M200-5001-2 hoursAcceptable
L500-10002-4 hoursSplit if possible
XL> 1000DaysMust split

Target: Keep PRs under 300 lines changed.

Commit Messages

Use conventional commits:

feat: add user authentication
fix: resolve login redirect loop
docs: update API documentation
refactor: extract auth utilities
test: add auth endpoint tests
chore: update dependencies

Format:

<type>: <short description>

<optional body explaining why>

<optional footer with references>

Branch Naming

feat/short-description    # New features
fix/issue-description     # Bug fixes
refactor/what-changed     # Code refactoring
docs/what-documented      # Documentation
test/what-tested          # Test additions

Common gh Commands

# Create PR with labels
gh pr create --title "feat: thing" --label "enhancement" --label "needs-review"

# Create draft PR
gh pr create --title "wip: thing" --draft

# Request reviewers
gh pr edit 123 --add-reviewer @username

# Check CI status
gh pr checks 123 --watch

# View PR diff
gh pr diff 123

# Checkout PR locally
gh pr checkout 123

# Close PR
gh pr close 123

# Reopen PR
gh pr reopen 123

# List open PRs
gh pr list

# View PR comments
gh pr view 123 --comments

Review Process

  1. Self-review first - Read your own diff before requesting review
  2. CI must pass - Don't request review until checks are green
  3. Respond to feedback - Address or discuss all comments
  4. Squash on merge - Keep main history clean
# Merge with squash (preferred)
gh pr merge 123 --squash --delete-branch

# Merge with rebase (for stacks)
gh pr merge 123 --rebase --delete-branch

Addressing PR Comments

When fixing review comments, follow this workflow for each comment:

1. Make Individual Commits

Create a separate conventional commit for each review comment fix:

# Fix first comment
git add src/auth.ts
git commit -m "fix: add null check for user token

Addresses review comment about potential null reference"

# Fix second comment
git add src/api/users.ts
git commit -m "refactor: extract validation logic to separate function

Addresses review comment about function complexity"

# Fix third comment
git add src/utils.ts
git commit -m "fix: handle edge case for empty array

Addresses review comment about missing edge case handling"

Do NOT batch multiple comment fixes into one commit. Each fix should be atomic and traceable.

2. Reply to the Comment

After committing the fix, reply to the review comment:

If fixed:

Fixed in <commit-sha>

Or with more context:

Fixed in abc1234 - added null check before accessing token property.

If not valid or won't fix:

I don't think this change is necessary because [reason].

[Explanation of why current implementation is correct/preferred]

Or:

This is intentional - [explanation]. Happy to discuss further if you disagree.

3. Resolve the Comment

After replying, resolve the conversation:

# View comments to get comment IDs
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr}/comments

# Or use the web UI to resolve after replying

In the GitHub web UI: Click "Resolve conversation" after your reply.

Complete Workflow Example

# 1. Read all comments
gh pr view 123 --comments

# 2. For each valid comment, fix and commit individually
git add src/auth.ts
git commit -m "fix: validate token expiry before use

Addresses review feedback on auth token handling"

# 3. Push all fixes
git push

# 4. Reply to each comment in GitHub UI or via API
gh api repos/adynato/myrepo/pulls/123/comments/456789/replies \
  -f body="Fixed in $(git rev-parse --short HEAD)"

# 5. Resolve each conversation in GitHub UI

Comment Response Templates

ScenarioResponse
Fixed"Fixed in abc1234"
Fixed with explanation"Fixed in abc1234 - moved validation to middleware as suggested"
Needs discussion"I see your point, but [reasoning]. What do you think about [alternative]?"
Won't fix (valid reason)"Intentionally kept as-is because [reason]. The tradeoff is [explanation]."
Won't fix (out of scope)"Good catch, but out of scope for this PR. Created #456 to track."
Question/clarification"Good question - [explanation of why code works this way]"

Rules

  1. One commit per comment - Makes it easy to trace what fixed what
  2. Always reply - Never leave comments unaddressed
  3. Always resolve - Clean up the conversation thread
  4. Reference commits - Include SHA so reviewer can verify the fix
  5. Be respectful - Even when disagreeing, explain your reasoning
  6. Create issues for scope creep - If a comment suggests something bigger, create an issue instead

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

30.28%
按下载量换算25

Antigravity

23.96%
按下载量换算19

windsurf

17.44%
按下载量换算14

Codex

12.18%
按下载量换算10

OpenCode

7.55%
按下载量换算6

Gemini CLI

3.86%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills