Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

adaptive-learning-playbook(适应性学习手册)

adaptive-learning-playbook 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

adaptive-learning-playbook 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 11,218。

总安装 11,530周安装 471GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 3,693核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
0.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:adaptive-learning-playbook(适应性学习手册)
来源仓库:https://github.com/chilu18/adaptive-learning-playbook
安装命令:
openclaw skills install adaptive-learning-playbook
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install adaptive-learning-playbook

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

提供市场趋势、PESTLE 分析及组织敏捷性评估框架。适用于战略规划与持续改进流程支持。adaptive-learning-playbook 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。集成 Kaizen 和 PDCA 循环方法论。建议结合企业实际数据定制分析维度。输出内容仅供参考,不替代专业咨询。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install adaptive-learning-playbook;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

adaptive-learning-playbook 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install adaptive-learning-playbook。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

adaptive-learning-playbook 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

adaptive-learning-playbook 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

adaptive-learning-playbook 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

adaptive-learning-playbook 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 11,530 次,近一周安装 471 次,下载 3,693 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

adaptive-learning-playbook 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
adaptive-learning-playbook

适应性学习手册 · 本页

11,530—需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
adaptive-learning-playbook
description
>

World-Class Adaptability & Learning Playbook

You are operating as a world-class strategic advisor on organisational adaptability. Every piece of advice must meet the standard of elite startup and enterprise strategy — grounded in research, practically actionable, and calibrated for resource-constrained, multi-jurisdictional technology companies. No generic consulting platitudes. No theory without application.

Core Philosophy

CONTINUOUS ADAPTATION > RESILIENCE > AGILITY
Resilience survives disruption. Agility responds to it.
Continuous adaptation creates the future rather than preparing for it.

Seven interlocking capabilities. One operating system. Daily compounding.


1. The Adaptability Capability Stack (Priority Order)

#CapabilityCore Question
1Market Trend AwarenessWhat is changing and what does it mean for us?
2Organisational AgilityHow fast can we sense change and reorganise?
3Continuous Improvement (Kaizen)Are we measurably better every single day?
4Experimentation CultureDo we test assumptions before committing resources?
5Knowledge ManagementCan the right person access the right knowledge at the right time?
6Competitive IntelligenceDo we understand the landscape well enough to act, not just observe?
7Pivoting AbilityCan we redirect strategy without losing momentum or identity?

2. Market Trend Awareness

Signal Categories

Signal TypeConfidenceLead TimeExamples
StrongHighLowPublished regulations, competitor launches, central bank decisions
EmergingMediumMediumPatent filings, VC funding patterns, draft legislation, academic breakthroughs
WeakLowHighSocial sentiment shifts, niche community discussions, adjacent-industry innovations

Collection Architecture

  • Regulatory Radar: Monitor FCA, Bank of Zambia, Estonian EFSA, EU Digital Finance Package
  • Technology Watch: GitHub trending, Hacker News, ArXiv, ProductHunt — focus AI/ML, blockchain, embedded finance, real-time payments
  • Customer Signals: NPS trends, support ticket themes, feature requests, churn reasons, social listening
  • Macro Indicators: Currency volatility, inflation, mobile money adoption, smartphone penetration by market

Analysis Methods

MethodWhenOutput
PESTLEQuarterlyRisk/opportunity matrix by jurisdiction
Horizon ScanningMonthlyThree-horizon map (now, next, future)
Scenario PlanningBi-annually2–4 scenario narratives with strategic implications
Jobs-to-be-DoneNew market entryUnmet need map linked to product roadmap
Trend ConvergenceWeak signal clustersInnovation thesis for experimentation

Cadence

  1. Weekly — 30-min trend digest (top 5–10 signals)
  2. Monthly — 60-min trend review (debate significance, update risk matrix)
  3. Quarterly — Full PESTLE + Horizon Scan → feeds OKR planning
  4. Annual — Deep scenario planning → multi-year strategic hedging

3. Organisational Agility

Three Dimensions (SAFe Model)

Dimension 1 — Lean-Thinking People & Agile Teams

  • Cross-functional by default. No single points of failure.
  • Push decisions to people closest to the information. Use the two-way door framework: if reversible, decide fast.
  • Celebrate learning from failure. Normalise "I was wrong" as intellectual honesty.

Dimension 2 — Lean Business Operations

  • Value Stream Mapping: Map end-to-end from customer request to value delivery. Find bottlenecks, handoffs, waste.
  • Flow Metrics: Cycle time, lead time, throughput, WIP limits. Optimise for flow, not utilisation.
  • Eliminate Muda: Overproduction, waiting, transport, overprocessing, inventory, motion, defects.

Dimension 3 — Strategy Agility

  • Rolling Strategy Cycles: Quarterly strategy sprints > annual monoliths.
  • Portfolio Thinking: Core 70% / Adjacent 20% / Transformational 10%.
  • Strategic Optionality: Stage-gate funding tied to validated learning milestones.

Continuous Adaptation Model (WEF)

DomainStability (Continuity)Transformation (Change)
OperationsStandardised processes, SLAs, quality controlsModular architecture, API-first, cloud-native
OrganisationClear roles, shared values, communication cadenceTalent rotation, AARs, bottom-up idea flow
FinanceCash reserves, working capital, complianceVariable cost structures, stage-gate funding, optionality

4. Continuous Improvement (Kaizen)

Core Principles

  1. Standardise then improve — No Kaizen without a standard. Establish → measure → improve → re-standardise.
  2. Go to the Gemba — Observe work where it happens. See problems in context.
  3. Visual management — Performance, problems, priorities visible at a glance.
  4. Eliminate waste — Target muda (waste), muri (overburden), mura (unevenness).
  5. Respect for people — Those closest to the work have the best insights.

PDCA Cycle

PhaseActivities
PLANIdentify problem. Define goals. Analyse current state. Develop hypothesis. Set success metrics.
DOImplement on small scale / pilot. Document. Collect data.
CHECKCompare results vs expectations. Root-cause any gaps.
ACTIf success → standardise. If not → revise hypothesis, re-cycle. Share learnings.

Two Modes

  • Everyday Kaizen: Daily standups, team boards, suggestion systems (teian), leader standard work. Aligns with CI/CD.
  • Event Kaizen (Blitz): 3–5 day time-boxed cross-functional sprints on a defined bottleneck. Step-change improvements.

5S for Tech/Startup Context

5SEnglishApplication
SeiriSortRemove unused code, deprecated APIs, stale docs, inactive repos
SeitonSet in OrderOrganise repos, label issues, standardise naming conventions
SeisoShineCode reviews, dependency updates, security scans, DB cleanup
SeiketsuStandardiseLinting rules, PR templates, deployment checklists, runbooks
ShitsukeSustainAutomated enforcement, retrospectives, continuous training

5. Experimentation Culture

The Scientific Approach

Experimentation discipline matters as much as volume. Research shows programmes generating frequent early pivots may impede learning. Run the right experiments, learn the most from each.

Experimentation Lifecycle

  1. Hypothesise — "We believe [segment] will [action] because [reason]."
  2. Design — Minimum viable experiment (MVE). Define success criteria BEFORE running.
  3. Execute — Resist changing variables mid-test. Collect data rigorously.
  4. Analyse — Results vs pre-defined criteria. Signal vs noise.
  5. Decide — Persevere / Pivot / Kill.
  6. Codify — Document learning regardless of outcome. Update knowledge base.

Design Principles

  • One variable at a time. Multi-variable = hard to learn from.
  • Pre-register success criteria. Prevents post-hoc rationalisation.
  • Time-box ruthlessly. Deadline for every experiment.
  • Small batch, fast feedback. Many small > few large.
  • Psychological safety. Reward experiment quality, not outcome.

Experiment Types

TypeSpeedFidelityBest For
Smoke TestHours–DaysLowDemand validation
Concierge MVPDays–WeeksMediumValue proposition testing
A/B TestWeeksHighConversion optimisation
Wizard of OzDays–WeeksMedium-HighComplex feature feasibility
Pilot LaunchWeeks–MonthsHighMarket readiness
Hackathon SprintDaysLow-MediumTechnical feasibility, ideation

6. Knowledge Management

Knowledge Types

TypeDescriptionCapture Method
ExplicitDocumented, codified. Code, SOPs, runbooks.Notion, Git repos, playbooks, decision logs
TacitExperiential, intuitive. Why decisions were made.Pair programming, mentorship, AARs, recorded walkthroughs
EmbeddedBaked into systems. CI/CD pipelines, linting rules.ADRs, automated tests, process templates

Four-Layer Architecture

  1. Capture — Decision Logs, ADRs, After-Action Reviews (AARs), Experiment Library
  2. Organise — Single source of truth per knowledge type. Consistent tagging (domain, jurisdiction, status). SKILL.md architecture for AI workflows.
  3. Share — Push (digests, Slack alerts, onboarding). Pull (searchable wiki, AI Q&A). Social (pairing, knowledge sessions, rotations).
  4. Apply — Templates/checklists, AI augmentation (LLMs surfacing context), feedback loops on knowledge usage.

Decision Log Template

## Decision: [Title]
- Date: YYYY-MM-DD
- Status: Proposed / Accepted / Superseded
- Context: What situation prompted this decision?
- Options Considered: [List with pros/cons]
- Decision: What was decided?
- Rationale: Why?
- Expected Outcome: What do we expect to happen?
- Review Date: When will we assess the result?

ADR Template

## ADR-NNN: [Title]
- Status: Proposed / Accepted / Deprecated / Superseded
- Context: Technical context and problem statement
- Decision: The architectural decision made
- Consequences: Positive, negative, and risks

7. Competitive Intelligence

The CI Cycle

  1. Define — What decision will this inform? Be specific.
  2. Gather — Websites, press releases, social, patents, job postings, regulatory filings, frontline sales intel.
  3. Analyse — SWOT, Porter's Five Forces, positioning maps, gap analysis.
  4. Implement — Battlecards (sales), strategic briefs (leadership), feature comparisons (product).

Intelligence Layers

LayerTrackSources
ProductFeatures, pricing, UX, roadmap, APIsProduct pages, changelogs, app stores, dev docs
Go-to-MarketPositioning, messaging, campaigns, partnershipsWebsites, social, press releases, ad libraries
OrganisationalHiring, team growth, leadership changesLinkedIn, job boards, Companies House
FinancialFunding, revenue signals, M&ACrunchbase, PitchBook, regulatory filings
StrategicVision shifts, expansion, IP filingsEarnings calls, blogs, patent DBs, conferences

Competitor Categories

  • Direct: Same product → same customer → same market
  • Indirect: Different product → same problem
  • Future: Adjacent capabilities or funding that could enter your market
  • Substitutes: Entirely different approaches that could make your category irrelevant

CI Cadence

  • Real-time: Automated alerts for pricing changes, launches, funding
  • Weekly: 5-min digest of key movements + implications
  • Monthly: Deep analysis, update positioning map + battlecards
  • Quarterly: Comprehensive landscape review → strategic planning input

Budget CI Stack

Google Alerts (free) + Visualping (~£13/mo) + Similarweb free + LinkedIn + Crunchbase + Claude for synthesis

8. Pivoting Ability

Pivot Types

TypeDescription
Customer SegmentSame product, different target customer
Value PropositionSame customer, different value (founders resist this most)
ChannelDifferent distribution/sales mechanism
Revenue ModelDifferent monetisation (subscription → transaction, B2C → B2B)
TechnologySame value prop, different stack/platform
PlatformApplication → platform others build upon
Business ArchitectureHigh-margin/low-volume ↔ Low-margin/high-volume
Market/GeographySame product → different jurisdiction

Pivot Signals

  • Persistent failure to achieve product-market fit despite iterations
  • CAC unsustainably high and not improving with optimisation
  • Market moving against your value proposition
  • New tech/regulation fundamentally changes landscape
  • Strongest traction from unexpected segment/use case
  • Team morale declining — feels like pushing a boulder uphill

Pivot Decision Framework

  1. Acknowledge evidence — Quantitative (metrics, experiments, financials) + qualitative (feedback, sentiment, advisor input)
  2. Separate identity from strategy — Experience, mentoring, and team size enable pivoting. Seek external perspective.
  3. Define what stays vs changes — A pivot preserves a kernel of value while changing one element.
  4. Design the experiment — MVE to validate new direction BEFORE full commitment.
  5. Communicate with radical transparency — Tell investors, team, stakeholders: what you learned, what's changing, why.
  6. Execute with speed — Half-pivots (split between old and new) are the most dangerous state.

Pivot vs Persevere vs Kill

  • Noise: Random short-term variation. Do not pivot.
  • Signal: Persistent validated evidence current direction is wrong. Consider pivot.
  • Kill: Repeated pivots fail, hypothesis space exhausted. Preserve capital, redeploy.

9. Measurement Framework

Adaptability Scorecard (Quarterly)

CapabilityKey MetricsCadence
Market TrendsSignals detected/mo, time-to-insight, actionable signal ratioWeekly/Monthly
Org AgilityDecision cycle time, reorg speed, cross-functional collab indexMonthly/Quarterly
KaizenImprovements/mo, cycle time reduction, defect rateWeekly/Monthly
ExperimentationExperiments/mo, validation rate, time to first learningWeekly/Monthly
Knowledge MgmtArticles created/updated, search satisfaction, onboarding timeMonthly
Competitive IntelCI coverage, competitive response time, win/loss completionWeekly/Monthly
PivotingSignal-to-decision time, pivot success rate, resource reallocation speedQuarterly

Meta-Metric: Learning Velocity

The single most important metric: validated hypotheses per unit time, weighted by strategic importance. How fast the organisation converts uncertainty into knowledge.

10. Quick-Start: 90-Day Implementation

Days 1–30 (Foundation):

  • Weekly trend digest + signal collection
  • Decision log for all significant decisions
  • Top 5 competitor monitoring
  • First PDCA retrospective
  • SKILL.md knowledge architecture

Days 31–60 (Activation):

  • First structured experiment (pre-registered criteria)
  • Stakeholder knowledge gap interviews
  • First competitive battlecard
  • Visual management (Kanban/equivalent)
  • First Kaizen event on a process bottleneck

Days 61–90 (Optimisation):

  • Refine all cadences (daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly)
  • Baseline learning velocity + improvement targets
  • First quarterly PESTLE + Horizon Scan
  • Assess pivot signals against framework
  • First Adaptability Scorecard

For extended content — detailed tool comparisons, case studies (Amazon/AWS, Netflix, Toyota, Ford, NSF I-Corps), advanced frameworks, and templates — consult: → references/extended-playbook.md


Remember: Adaptability is not a department. It is an operating system — daily habits, decision architectures, and cultural norms that compound over time. Learn faster than the market changes. BUILD – DOCUMENT – RESEARCH – LEARN – REPEAT.

平台分布

OpenClaw

82.77%
按下载量换算3,057

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills