Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

actual-self-improvement(实际的自我提升)

actual-self-improvement 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

actual-self-improvement 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 1,356。

总安装 98,172周安装 4,174GitHub Stars 2下载 34,394核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:actual-self-improvement(实际的自我提升)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tristanmanchester/actual-self-improvement
安装命令:
openclaw skills install actual-self-improvement
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install actual-self-improvement

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

从调试与用户更正中提取经验教训,优化未来工作流程。适合在 OpenClaw 中避免重复错误并提升会议效率。自动识别缺失功能与摩擦点,推动持续改进。需确认学习数据存储方式与访问控制机制。actual-self-improvement 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

建议定期回顾输出结果以确保改进方向正确。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install actual-self-improvement;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

actual-self-improvement 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install actual-self-improvement。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

actual-self-improvement 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

actual-self-improvement 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

actual-self-improvement 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

actual-self-improvement 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 98,172 次,近一周安装 4,174 次,下载 34,394 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

actual-self-improvement 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
actual-self-improvement

实际的自我提升 · 本页

98,1722需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
self-improvement
description
Capture durable lessons from debugging, user corrections, missing capabilities, and repeated workflow friction so future sessions avoid the same mistakes. Use this skill when a non-obvious failure is diagnosed, the user corrects or updates the agent, a workaround or project convention is discovered, a capability is missing, a solved issue should be promoted into shared memory, or you should review prior learnings before changing a known-problem area. Do not use for trivial typos, expected failures, straightforward retries, or one-off noise with no reusable lesson.
compatibility
Portable Agent Skills format. Core workflow is agent-agnostic. Bundled helpers require Python 3.11+; hook helpers require bash. No network access is required. Hook snippets are examples for Claude Code-style configs and OpenClaw; manual use works everywhere.
metadata
version
4.0.0
original_slug
self-improving-agent
category
workflow
author
OpenAI adaptation from user-provided skill

Self-Improvement

Capture, review, promote, and extract durable lessons so future sessions avoid repeating the same mistakes.

Core idea

Use this skill for reusable learning, not for every bump in the road.

A good entry usually has at least one of these properties:

  • It corrected a wrong assumption.
  • It revealed a project-specific convention.
  • It required real debugging or investigation.
  • It is likely to recur.
  • It should change future workflow, memory, or tooling.

Do not log routine noise such as obvious typos, expected validation failures, or errors that were solved immediately with no transferable lesson.

Important path model

There are two different roots in this skill:

  1. Skill root — where bundled resources live:

- scripts/... - references/... - assets/...

  1. Workspace root — where the project or active workspace lives:

- .learnings/LEARNINGS.md - .learnings/ERRORS.md - .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md - CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, SOUL.md, TOOLS.md

Never write learnings into the installed skill directory. Always target the workspace root.

Quick decision table

SituationWhat to do
User corrects you or updates a factLog a learning
Non-obvious command / API / tool failureLog an error
User asks for a missing capabilityLog a feature request
You discover a reusable workaround or conventionLog a learning
A pattern keeps recurringSearch related entries, link with See Also, and consider promotion
A lesson is broadly applicable or repeatedPromote it into project memory
A resolved, general pattern could help other projectsExtract a new skill

Standard workflow

1) Find the workspace root first

Before reading or writing .learnings/, determine WORKSPACE_ROOT.

Good defaults:

  • the repository root for the current codebase
  • the OpenClaw workspace root
  • the directory containing the files being edited

If unsure, prefer the directory containing .git, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or the user's active project files.

2) Initialise .learnings/ if needed

Use the helper instead of creating files manually:

python3 scripts/learnings.py init --root /absolute/path/to/workspace

This creates:

  • .learnings/LEARNINGS.md
  • .learnings/ERRORS.md
  • .learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md

3) Review existing learnings before risky or familiar work

Review first when:

  • you are returning to an area with prior failures
  • the task touches infra, CI, deployment, auth, data migration, or generated code
  • the user explicitly says “remember this”, “we hit this before”, or similar

Use the helper:

python3 scripts/learnings.py status --root /absolute/path/to/workspace
python3 scripts/learnings.py search --root /absolute/path/to/workspace --query "pnpm" --limit 5

4) Search before logging to avoid duplicates

Always search for related entries before creating a new one.

python3 scripts/learnings.py search --root /absolute/path/to/workspace --query "keyword or pattern" --limit 10

If a similar entry already exists:

  • prefer linking with See Also
  • reuse or add a stable Pattern-Key for recurring issues
  • bump priority only when recurrence justifies it
  • prefer updating the existing pattern story over spraying near-duplicate entries

5) Log the right kind of entry

Learning

Use for corrections, knowledge gaps, best practices, and durable conventions.

python3 scripts/learnings.py log-learning \
  --root /absolute/path/to/workspace \
  --category correction \
  --priority high \
  --area backend \
  --summary "Project uses pnpm workspaces, not npm" \
  --details "Attempted npm install. Lockfile and workspace config showed pnpm." \
  --suggested-action "Check for pnpm-lock.yaml before assuming npm." \
  --source error \
  --related-files pnpm-lock.yaml pnpm-workspace.yaml \
  --tags package-manager,pnpm
Error

Use for non-obvious failures, exceptions, or tool/API issues worth remembering.

python3 scripts/learnings.py log-error \
  --root /absolute/path/to/workspace \
  --name docker-build \
  --priority high \
  --area infra \
  --summary "Docker build failed on Apple Silicon due to platform mismatch" \
  --error-text "error: failed to solve: no match for platform linux/arm64" \
  --context "docker build -t myapp . on Apple Silicon" \
  --suggested-fix "Retry with --platform linux/amd64 or update base image" \
  --reproducible yes \
  --related-files Dockerfile
Feature request

Use when the user wants a missing capability or a recurring friction point should become a feature.

python3 scripts/learnings.py log-feature \
  --root /absolute/path/to/workspace \
  --capability export-to-csv \
  --priority medium \
  --area backend \
  --summary "User needs report export to CSV" \
  --user-context "Needed for sharing weekly reports with non-technical stakeholders" \
  --complexity-estimate simple \
  --suggested-implementation "Add --output csv alongside existing JSON output" \
  --frequency recurring \
  --related-features analyze-command,json-output

6) Promote proven lessons into memory

Promote when the learning is broad, repeated, or something any future contributor should know.

Common targets:

  • CLAUDE.md — durable project facts and conventions
  • AGENTS.md — workflow rules and automation guidance
  • .github/copilot-instructions.md — shared Copilot context
  • SOUL.md — behavioural principles in OpenClaw workspaces
  • TOOLS.md — tool-specific gotchas in OpenClaw workspaces

Write promotions as short prevention rules, not long incident write-ups.

Example:

  • Bad promotion: “On 2026-03-12 npm failed because…”
  • Good promotion: “Use pnpm install in this repo; it is a pnpm workspace.”

When a learning is promoted, update the original entry’s status to promoted or promoted_to_skill and record the destination.

7) Extract a reusable skill when the pattern is real

Extract a new skill when the solution is:

  • resolved and working
  • broadly useful beyond one file or repo
  • non-obvious enough that future agents would benefit
  • recurring enough to justify its own instructions

Use the helper:

python3 scripts/extract_skill.py \
  --root /absolute/path/to/workspace \
  docker-build-fixes \
  --description "Fix recurring Docker build and platform mismatch issues. Use when Docker builds fail due to architecture, base image, or runtime packaging problems." \
  --from-learning-id LRN-20260313-001 \
  --scaffold-evals

Or keep the old entry point if existing automation already calls it:

bash scripts/extract-skill.sh docker-build-fixes --root /absolute/path/to/workspace --dry-run

Logging rules that matter most

  1. Search first. Duplicate entries are worse than missing tags.
  2. Prefer durable lessons. Only log what should change future behaviour.
  3. Be specific. Name the assumption, failure, or convention clearly.
  4. Include the fix or prevention rule. An entry without next action is weak.
  5. Use stable pattern keys for recurring problems. This lets recurrence compound.
  6. Promote aggressively once a rule is proven. The point is fewer repeat mistakes.
  7. Do not interrupt the user with bookkeeping. Log silently unless the user asked to see it or you need missing details.

Recommended references

Use these only when needed:

  • references/entry-formats.md — full field schemas and manual templates
  • references/examples.md — concrete examples of good entries and promotions
  • references/promotion-and-extraction.md — promotion rules and skill extraction criteria
  • references/platform-setup.md — Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, and OpenClaw setup notes
  • references/evaluation.md — trigger/output eval plan for this skill
  • references/openclaw-integration.md — deeper OpenClaw workflow guidance

Hooks

Hook helpers are intentionally optional.

Available hook scripts:

  • scripts/activator.sh — lightweight reminder at prompt start
  • scripts/error-detector.sh — lightweight error reminder after failed Bash-like commands

Hook configuration examples live in references/platform-setup.md.

What “next-level” looks like for this skill

A mature use of this skill has a loop:

capture → dedupe → promote → extract → evaluate

That means:

  • entries are created with deterministic IDs and consistent fields
  • repeated issues link to each other instead of fragmenting
  • proven rules move into persistent memory files
  • broadly useful fixes become standalone skills
  • the skill itself is tested with trigger and output evals in evals/

平台分布

OpenClaw

92.17%
按下载量换算31,701

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills