Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

tech-blog科技博客

Agent Skill

tech-blog 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

198

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

62
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tech-blog(科技博客)
来源仓库:https://github.com/acking-you/myclaude-skills
仓库路径:skills/tech-blog
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/acking-you/myclaude-skills --skill tech-blog
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/acking-you/myclaude-skills --skill tech-blog

简介

tech-blog 提供技术博客写作指导,适用于深度解析、实现教程和技术比较类内容创作。

  • 适用于源代码分析、架构深入探讨、技术对比和设计权衡等场景的文档撰写。
  • 通过 GitHub 安装,宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor 和 Gemini CLI,采用结构化文档骨架。
  • 安装前应确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件操作。
  • 强调问题优先、代码版本标注和文件行号引用,确保内容可追溯和准确。

SKILL.md

Technical Blog Writing Skill

When to Use

  • Source code analysis / architecture deep dive
  • Implementation walkthrough with file:line citations
  • Technology comparison or design trade-off post
  • Doc-driven research post (no source code in scope)

Document Skeleton

# [Topic] Deep Dive

Brief intro + why it matters.
> **Code Version**: Based on [project] `vX.Y.Z` (commit `abc1234`).

## 1. Introduction (problem + scope + navigation table)
## 2-N. Core Content (by data flow, not code structure)
## N+1. Design Decisions & Trade-offs
## N+2. Code Index (file, lines, responsibility)
## References
  • §1 = problem + scope + navigation only — no implementation
  • Each core section follows: concept → diagram → code → insight
  • Navigation hints: > ⏭️ First-time readers: skip to §X.

Core Principles

  1. Problem-first, progressive — start with the problem; build concepts layer by layer; explain "why"
  2. Concept-before-use — never use undefined terms; add §X.Y.1 concept sections; cross-ref with ⏭️
  3. Big picture first — unified visual overview before details; comparison diagram/table for 2+ approaches
  4. Balanced comparison — analyze both sides; comparison tables; identify real differences vs. equivalences
  5. Design decisions — state the problem, alternatives, and trade-offs for every non-obvious choice
  6. Concrete examples — 1-2 per major section; show input → process → output with real data
  7. Terminology accuracy — verify via source code or official docs; define on first use

Research Strategy

SourceWhenExamples
Source codeProject-specific logic, defaults, file pathsConfig params, implementation variants
KnowledgeStandard protocols, well-known algorithmsES DSL, HTTP, B+ tree
Doc-drivenNo source code; external systemsOfficial docs → vendor blogs → community

Doc-driven rules: extract claim list → cite at claim location → reference-style links [Label]: URL → separate fact vs. inference → never fabricate numbers.


Writing Guidelines

Code Examples

  • Every snippet needs file_path:line_number
  • Explain what it does, not just show it
  • Replace large blocks with diagram + key snippet

Mermaid Styling Standard

All diagrams must use rich color styling. Monotone = rejected.

Color Palette

RoleFillStrokeText
Primary Actor#6C5CE7#5A4BD1#fff
Core Component#0984E3#0770C2#fff
Service / Hub#00B894#009D7E#fff
Helper / Auxiliary#FDCB6E#E0B050#2D3436
External / Remote#E17055#C0392B#fff
Data Store#636E72#2D3436#fff
Output / Sink#55EFC4#00B894#2D3436
Light Accent#74B9FF#0984E3#2D3436

graph / flowchart — every node styled; subgraphs: named ID + emoji label + colored bg

graph TB
    subgraph local["🖥️ Local"]
        A["Component A"]
        B["Component B"]
    end
    subgraph remote["📱 Remote"]
        C["Client"]
    end
    A --> B --> C
    style A fill:#0984E3,stroke:#0770C2,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
    style B fill:#00B894,stroke:#009D7E,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
    style C fill:#E17055,stroke:#C0392B,color:#fff,stroke-width:2px
    style local fill:#DFE6E9,stroke:#636E72,stroke-width:2px,color:#2D3436
    style remote fill:#FAD7D4,stroke:#E17055,stroke-width:2px,color:#2D3436

sequenceDiagrambox rgb() per layer + emoji participants

sequenceDiagram
    box rgb(232,245,253) CLI Side
        participant CLI as 🔧 CLI
    end
    box rgb(220,247,235) Hub Side
        participant Hub as 🌐 Hub
    end
    CLI->>Hub: request
    Hub-->>CLI: response

Box colors: CLI rgb(232,245,253) · Hub rgb(220,247,235) · Web rgb(255,235,238) · Agent rgb(237,231,246) · User rgb(255,243,224)

stateDiagram-v2classDef per category + class binding

stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> Active
    Active --> Idle : timeout
    classDef activeStyle fill:#0984E3,color:#fff,stroke:#0770C2,stroke-width:2px
    classDef idleStyle fill:#6C5CE7,color:#fff,stroke:#5A4BD1,stroke-width:2px
    class Active activeStyle
    class Idle idleStyle

Rules: step numbers for complex flows (A -->|1. Do X| B) · emoji in labels · no unstyled diagrams

Callouts

  • 💡 Key Point — critical insight
  • ⚠️ Gotcha — common mistake or subtle trap
  • 🤔 Think About — design reasoning or open question
  • ⏭️ Navigation — cross-reference to another section

Quality Gates

  • No fabricated data — qualitative OK ("fast compression"); quantitative needs citation
  • DRY concepts — same concept in 3+ places → one authoritative section, others reference it
  • Hybrid systems — verify which component does what; trace actual data flow; don't assume

Common Pitfalls

PitfallFix
Abrupt transitionsConnection sentences between sections
One-sided comparisonComparison table, analyze both sides
Code without contextExplain role in the system
Too much source codeDiagram + key snippet
Undefined conceptsConcept section before use
Missing big pictureUnified visual overview first
Fabricated dataQualitative language or cite source
Missing commit idAlways specify for external repos
Monotone diagramsFull Mermaid styling standard

Large Documents (>500 lines)

Draft-first: [topic]-DRAFT.md → build → review → merge → delete draft.


Checklist

  • Sections flow with transitions; summary-detail pattern
  • Concepts introduced before use; ⏭️ navigation hints
  • Code examples have file:line; 1-2 concrete examples per section
  • No fabricated numbers; terminology verified against source
  • Code version / commit id specified
  • All Mermaid diagrams fully styled (palette + emoji + backgrounds)
  • Comparison tables for similar concepts

Output

  • Location: docs/, ai_docs/, or project folder
  • Filename: [topic-name].md
  • Language: match user preference

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

windsurf

25.9%
按下载量换算16

Codex

22.6%
按下载量换算14

github-copilot

18.61%
按下载量换算12

Claude Code

12.85%
按下载量换算8

Antigravity

8.86%
按下载量换算5

Gemini CLI

3.74%
按下载量换算2

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills