Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

tdd时差

Agent Skill

tdd 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

380

周安装

16

GitHub Stars

11

下载量

133
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tdd(时差)
来源仓库:https://github.com/acedergren/agentic-tools
仓库路径:skills/tdd
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/acedergren/agentic-tools --skill tdd
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/acedergren/agentic-tools --skill tdd

简介

tdd 强制实施严格的测试驱动开发流程:红-绿-重构-提交,确保每次变更都有对应测试覆盖。

  • 它适用于需要按行为增量推进、防止回归或提升代码质量的开发任务。
  • 使用时必须遵循单行为一循环原则,先写失败测试再实现功能,最后重构并运行完整套件。
  • 安装前请确认测试框架配置及是否允许文件读写或命令执行。
  • 注意避免将编译错误误判为测试失败,并确保 mock 初始化正确。

SKILL.md

TDD Implementation Skill

Enforce a strict test-driven development cycle: Red → Green → Refactor → Commit.

NEVER

  • NEVER write implementation before tests — this is the entire point; skip it and the skill has no value
  • NEVER skip mock bootstrap validation — write one mock round-trip test first and confirm it passes before writing 20 tests
  • NEVER skip the full test suite run — your file passing is not enough; regressions in unrelated files are your responsibility to notice
  • NEVER proceed if tests pass in Red phase — a test that passes before implementation is testing nothing; revise it
  • NEVER batch multiple features into one TDD cycle — one behavior change per red-green-refactor loop
  • NEVER treat a compile/import error as "red" — tests must fail for the right reason (assertion failure, not broken setup)

Before Writing Any Tests

If mockReset: true in test runner config, most internet mock examples silently fail — return values clear between tests.

grep -rn 'mockReset\|mockClear\|restoreMocks' vitest.config.* jest.config.*

If mockReset: true, you MUST reconfigure return values in beforeEach, not at module scope. Write ONE bootstrap test first to validate your mock wiring:

import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";

const mocks = vi.hoisted(() => ({
  myDep: vi.fn(),
}));

vi.mock("../path/to/dependency", () => ({
  myDep: (...args: unknown[]) => mocks.myDep(...args),
}));

describe("bootstrap", () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    mocks.myDep.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true });
  });

  it("mock resolves correctly", async () => {
    const { myDep } = await import("../path/to/dependency");
    expect(await myDep()).toEqual({ ok: true });
  });
});

Run it, confirm it passes, then delete it and write the real tests using that same pattern.

Red Phase

Write tests covering: happy path, edge cases (empty/boundary inputs), error cases (invalid input, unauthorized, missing resource).

npx vitest run <test-file> --reporter=verbose

Checkpoint: All new tests MUST fail. If any pass → the behavior already exists or the test is wrong.

Green Phase

Write the minimum code to make tests pass. No untested features, no premature optimization, no untested error handling.

npx vitest run <test-file> --reporter=verbose

Checkpoint: All tests (new and existing) pass.

Full Suite

npx vitest run --reporter=verbose

If outside tests fail: determine if your change caused the regression. If yes → fix before proceeding. If pre-existing → note it and continue.

Refactor (Optional)

Only when tests are green. Extract helpers, improve naming, simplify conditionals. Re-run full suite after.

Quality Gates

npx eslint <changed-files>
npx tsc --noEmit

Fix before committing.

Mock Patterns Reference

Forwarding Pattern (survives mockReset)

const mockFn = vi.fn();
vi.mock("./dep", () => ({
  dep: (...args: unknown[]) => mockFn(...args),
}));
beforeEach(() => {
  mockFn.mockResolvedValue(defaultResult);
});

Counter-Based Sequencing (multi-query operations)

let callCount = 0;
mockExecute.mockImplementation(async () => {
  callCount++;
  if (callCount === 1) return insertResult;
  if (callCount === 2) return selectResult;
});

globalThis Registry (TDZ workaround for interdependent mocks)

vi.mock("./dep", () => {
  if (!(globalThis as any).__mocks) (globalThis as any).__mocks = {};
  const m = { dep: vi.fn() };
  (globalThis as any).__mocks.dep = m;
  return { dep: (...a: unknown[]) => m.dep(...a) };
});
// In tests: const mocks = (globalThis as any).__mocks;

Arguments

  • $ARGUMENTS: Optional description of what to implement via TDD

- Example: /tdd add rate limiting to the search endpoint - If empty: ask the user what to implement

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.87%
按下载量换算45

Claude

31.59%
按下载量换算42

Cursor

17.2%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

8.66%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills