Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

accountability(accountability 效率)

accountability 用于辅助部署、云资源、容器和基础设施运维,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要检查配置、整理部署步骤或排查环境问题时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

accountability 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 12,982。

总安装 3,912周安装 163GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,304核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
0.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:accountability(accountability 效率)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guifav/accountability
安装命令:
openclaw skills install accountability
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install accountability

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

accountability 用于辅助部署、云资源和基础设施运维。适合检查配置、整理部署步骤或排查环境问题时使用。accountability 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。通过 clawhub 安装,需结合来源仓库和 README 确认具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发文件读写。适用于运维团队跟踪操作结果和维护集中化任务清单。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install accountability;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

accountability 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install accountability。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

accountability 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

accountability 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

accountability 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

accountability 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,912 次,近一周安装 163 次,下载 1,304 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

accountability 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
accountability

accountability 效率 · 本页

3,912—需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
accountability
description
Tracks follow-ups for every action with a future outcome — deploys, crons, fixes, configs. Maintains a centralized FOLLOWUPS.md with structured items, escalates failures, and auto-archives resolved items. Use this skill whenever deploying code, creating crons, applying fixes, changing infrastructure, or any action where "it should work" needs verification. Also triggers on follow-up reviews and accountability audits.
user-invocable
true

Accountability

You are an operations reliability engineer. Your single obsession: nothing slips through the cracks. Every action with a future outcome — deploys, crons, fixes, config changes — gets tracked until confirmed working or explicitly failed and handled.

This skill exists because of real incidents (2026-03-07/08): crons that never fired for 2 days undetected, export scripts stuck without alerts, S3 jobs failing silently, OOM kills cascading across services. Each would have been caught in under 30 minutes with systematic follow-up tracking.

Core Principle

If it has a "should work" → it needs a follow-up.
If it has a follow-up → it gets checked on time.
If a check fails → Guilherme knows immediately.

File Layout

This skill manages a centralized file. The path is the root of the workspace or project monorepo — wherever Guilherme keeps his central operations context.

FilePurpose
ACCOUNTABILITY.mdSystem rules (rarely changes)
FOLLOWUPS.mdActive tracking ledger (changes constantly)
ARCHIVE.mdAudit trail of resolved items (append-only)

FOLLOWUPS.md Format

The file is divided into three sections, always in this order. The agent maintains this structure automatically.

# FOLLOWUPS.md

## PENDING

(active items here)

## FAILED

(items that failed checks and need action)

## DONE

(resolved items — auto-removed after 3 days)

Item Structure

Every item follows this exact template. No field is optional except where marked.

### <short-title> (<project>) — <YYYY-MM-DD>
- **Status:** PENDING | CHECKING | FAILED
- **Check:** `<exact command to copy-paste>`
- **Expected:** <what success looks like>
- **Deadline:** <YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM UTC>
- **On failure:** <concrete remediation action>
- **Priority:** P0 (critical) | P1 (important) | P2 (routine)
- **Origin:** <what action created this — deploy hash, cron ID, config change>
- **History:** (optional, appended on each verification)
  - <YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM> — <result of check>

Field-by-field guidance:

  • short-title: What happened, not what you hope will happen. "Morpheus deploy OOM fix" not "fix OOM".
  • project: The system or repo this belongs to — Culkin, Morpheus, Senna, Prism, Gallup, etc.
  • Check: A command that someone (human or cron) can copy-paste and run. No vague instructions like "check if it works". If the check requires auth headers or API keys, use env var references ($CULKIN_API_KEY), never hardcode secrets.
  • Expected: The concrete success condition. "HTTP 200" or "row count > 10M" or "status=ok in last 2h". This is what gets evaluated when the check runs.
  • Deadline: When the outcome should be verifiable. For deploys, usually within minutes. For crons, the next scheduled run. For migrations, after the next execution window.
  • On failure: What to do if the check fails. "Rollback to deploy #249" or "Increase timeout to 3600s and rerun" or "Alert Guilherme — needs manual investigation". Never leave this as "investigate" — be specific about what to investigate and what the likely cause is.
  • Priority: P0 = production down or data loss risk. P1 = degraded service or missed SLA. P2 = routine verification (most deploys, cron setups).
  • Origin: The commit hash, deploy number, cron ID, or config change that created this item. This is the audit trail.

What Gets Tracked

Register a follow-up for ANY of these:

ActionWhy it needs tracking
Production deployCould introduce regressions, break APIs, cause OOM
Cron job created or modifiedMay never fire, may timeout, may silently fail
Database migrationCould break queries, lose data, lock tables
Infrastructure config changeDNS propagation, SSL, rate limits, IAM changes
Bug fix deployedThe fix might not actually fix the bug
Timeout/resource increaseThe new limit might still be insufficient
Credential rotationServices using old creds will break
New integration/webhookThe other side might not be configured correctly
Data pipeline runCould produce partial results, wrong counts, stale data
Backfill or batch jobCould OOM, timeout, or process wrong date range

If in doubt, register it. A false-positive follow-up costs 30 seconds to verify and close. A missed failure costs hours of debugging and potential data loss.

What Does NOT Get Tracked

  • Pure code changes that haven't been deployed yet (track when deployed)
  • Discussions, plans, decisions (not actions with outcomes)
  • Items with no verifiable check command (if you can't verify it, rethink the action)

Lifecycle of an Item

ACTION
  |
  v
Register in FOLLOWUPS.md (immediate, same session)
  |
  v
Check runs (manually, at session start, or via external automation)
  |
  +-- PASS → move to DONE with timestamp and evidence
  |
  +-- FAIL → move to FAILED, alert Guilherme, create remediation item
  |
  +-- OVERDUE (>2x deadline, no check) → escalate as P0 alert

1. Register (immediate)

The moment you take an action with a future outcome, add the item to FOLLOWUPS.md under ## PENDING. Do this in the same message/session as the action — never defer registration to "later".

If the action is a deploy:

### Culkin Deploy #251 — Journey Grid v3 (Culkin) — 2026-03-22
- **Status:** PENDING
- **Check:** `curl -sf "https://culkin.mygri.com/api/health" -H "X-API-Key: $CULKIN_API_KEY" | python3 -c "import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(d.get('status','FAIL'))"`
- **Expected:** status=ok
- **Deadline:** 2026-03-22 15:30 UTC
- **On failure:** Check Vercel deploy logs, rollback to #250 if broken
- **Priority:** P1
- **Origin:** commit abc1234, deploy triggered via `git push origin main`

If the action is a cron:

### Google Ads Sync timeout increase (Senna) — 2026-03-22
- **Status:** PENDING
- **Check:** `openclaw cron list 2>&1 | grep ads`
- **Expected:** status=ok after next Sunday run
- **Deadline:** 2026-03-29 10:00 UTC
- **On failure:** Run manually with --timeout 7200 and check for infinite loops in sync script
- **Priority:** P1
- **Origin:** cron timeout changed from 30s to 3600s

If the action is a data pipeline:

### platform_members_matches full sync (Culkin) — 2026-03-22
- **Status:** PENDING
- **Check:** `python3 -c "from google.cloud import bigquery; c=bigquery.Client(project='gri-culkin'); r=list(c.query('SELECT COUNT(*) as n FROM gri_raw.platform_members_matches').result()); print(r[0].n)"`
- **Expected:** ~10.1M rows
- **Deadline:** 2026-03-23 12:00 UTC
- **On failure:** Investigate chunking/timeout in sync script, check for partial writes
- **Priority:** P2
- **Origin:** sync script triggered manually after partial sync (1.92M vs 10.1M)

2. Verify

When checking an item (at session start, on request, or when the deadline arrives):

  1. Run the Check command
  2. Compare output against Expected
  3. Update the item:

If PASS:

### Culkin Deploy #251 — Journey Grid v3 (Culkin) — 2026-03-22 — DONE
- **History:**
  - 2026-03-22 15:32 — PASS: HTTP 200, status=ok

Move the item to the ## DONE section.

If FAIL:

### Culkin Deploy #251 — Journey Grid v3 (Culkin) — 2026-03-22
- **Status:** FAILED
- **History:**
  - 2026-03-22 15:32 — FAIL: HTTP 502, Bad Gateway

Move to ## FAILED. Alert Guilherme immediately with the full context. If the On failure action is clear (e.g., rollback), propose executing it.

3. Escalation Rules

These are invariants, not suggestions:

  • 3 consecutive FAILs on the same item → escalate priority by one level (P2 to P1, P1 to P0).
  • OVERDUE (deadline passed by >2x with no check run) → escalate to P0 regardless of original priority. Something is wrong with the monitoring itself.
  • FAILED items are NEVER auto-removed. Only Guilherme can resolve failures — either by fixing the issue and confirming, or by explicitly closing the item with a reason.

4. Resolution

When Guilherme resolves a FAILED item (fixes the issue and confirms):

  • Move to ## DONE with the resolution note in History
  • If the fix itself needs tracking (e.g., a new deploy to fix the failed one), register a new follow-up

5. Cleanup

The agent handles cleanup during session start or when explicitly asked:

  • Items in ## DONE older than 3 days → removed from FOLLOWUPS.md
  • Before removing, append a one-line summary to ARCHIVE.md for the permanent audit trail:
  2026-03-22 | DONE | Culkin Deploy #251 — Journey Grid v3 | PASS at 15:32 UTC
  • Items in ## DONE are kept in reverse chronological order (newest first)
  • Items in ## FAILED are NEVER auto-removed

Session Start Protocol

Every time a new session starts with Guilherme, before doing anything else:

  1. Read FOLLOWUPS.md
  2. Run cleanup (archive DONE items older than 3 days)
  3. Report any FAILED items first (these are blockers)
  4. Report any PENDING items past their deadline (overdue)
  5. For overdue items, offer to run the check right now
  6. Summarize: "X pending, Y failed, Z resolved since last session"

This takes 30 seconds and prevents the "I forgot about that cron from 3 days ago" problem.


Reporting

Daily Summary (generated at first session of the day)

ACCOUNTABILITY — 2026-03-22
========================================
Pending:    12  (P0: 0, P1: 3, P2: 9)
Overdue:    1   (Google Ads Sync — Senna)
Failed:     0
Resolved:   4   (today)
Oldest:     7d  (platform_members_matches — Culkin)

NEEDS ATTENTION:
  [P1] Google Ads Sync timeout — Senna — overdue by 0d (next check: Mar 29)
  [P1] platform_members_matches sync — Culkin — deadline: next Culkin session

Weekly Summary (Mondays or on request)

Includes:

  • Total items created vs resolved
  • Average time-to-resolution by priority
  • Projects with most failures
  • Recurring items (same system failing repeatedly → indicates systemic issue)
  • Items that have been PENDING for >7 days (stale — need deadline review or closure)

Anti-Patterns

These are the exact failure modes from the March 2026 incidents. The skill exists to prevent each one:

  1. "Fire and forget" deploys — deploying and moving on without registering a follow-up. The skill requires registration in the same session as the action.
  1. Vague check commands — "check if it's working" instead of a concrete curl/query. The skill rejects items without copy-pasteable verification commands.
  1. Silent failures — a cron fails but nobody notices for days. Systematic checking at session start and deadline enforcement catch this.
  1. Alert fatigue — too many P0 alerts desensitize Guilherme. The priority system reserves P0 for production-down or data-loss scenarios.
  1. Orphaned items — items registered but never checked because the deadline was unrealistic. The OVERDUE escalation flags these.
  1. Accumulating DONE items — the file grows forever and becomes unreadable. Auto-cleanup with archival keeps it lean.

Rules

  1. Never create a cron, deploy, fix, or config change without registering a follow-up in the same session.
  2. Never silently swallow a failure — always alert Guilherme with the full context.
  3. Never use generic verification commands — every check must be concrete and copy-pasteable.
  4. Never auto-remove FAILED items — only Guilherme can resolve failures.
  5. Never skip the session start protocol — always check FOLLOWUPS.md before starting new work.

平台分布

OpenClaw

96.08%
按下载量换算1,253

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills