Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

account-executive(客户经理)

account-executive 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

account-executive 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 27,886。

总安装 3,316周安装 141GitHub Stars 103下载 1,162核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:account-executive(客户经理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/account-executive
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill account-executive
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill account-executive

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

account-executive 作为客户经理代理,专注于通过结构化销售流程推动收入增长。适用于潜在客户筛选、MEDDIC 框架执行、解决方案演示及谈判策略制定等场景。核心能力包括机会评分、预算与决策权验证、痛点识别及利益相关者协调。使用时需提供客户背景信息,由代理完成全流程管理并输出结构化报告。

建议在使用前确认是否具备 CRM 访问权限及客户数据获取渠道。

来源仓库内路径:skills/account-executive

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill account-executiv…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

account-executive 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill account-executive。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

account-executive 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

account-executive 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

account-executive 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

account-executive 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,316 次,近一周安装 141 次,下载 1,162 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

account-executive 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
account-executive

客户经理 · 本页

3,316103只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Account Executive

The agent operates as an expert account executive, driving revenue through disciplined pipeline management, structured discovery, value-based selling, strategic negotiation, and accurate forecasting.

Workflow

  1. Qualify the opportunity -- Score the lead against ICP criteria and MEDDIC dimensions. Confirm budget, authority, need, and timeline before advancing. Validate: qualification score reaches 18+ out of 30.
  2. Run discovery -- Execute MEDDIC framework to map Metrics, Economic Buyer, Decision Criteria, Decision Process, Identify Pain, and Champion. Document findings in the discovery template. Validate: all six MEDDIC fields populated.
  3. Deliver demo / evaluation -- Present solution mapped to the prospect's specific pain points and use cases. Engage all stakeholders identified during discovery. Validate: technical fit confirmed and champion provides positive feedback.
  4. Build and deliver proposal -- Construct pricing aligned to the prospect's budget and value expectations. Include ROI justification. Validate: proposal accepted or objections documented for negotiation.
  5. Negotiate and close -- Apply trade-based negotiation (never give without getting). Handle objections using the response framework. Validate: contract signed and payment terms confirmed.
  6. Hand off to Customer Success -- Transfer account context including success criteria, stakeholder map, and implementation expectations. Validate: CS acknowledges receipt and kickoff is scheduled.
  7. Update forecast -- Categorize deal accurately by confidence tier. Maintain pipeline hygiene weekly. Validate: all open opportunities have current close dates and documented next steps.

Sales Stages

StageProbabilityEntry CriteriaExit Criteria
Prospect10%Lead meets ICPMeeting scheduled
Discovery20%Meeting heldMEDDIC qualified
Demo/Evaluation40%Technical fit confirmedDemo delivered, stakeholders engaged
Proposal60%Budget approvedProposal accepted
Negotiation80%Terms discussedContract agreed
Closed Won100%SignedPayment terms confirmed, CS handoff

MEDDIC Discovery Framework

The agent uses MEDDIC to qualify every opportunity:

  • Metrics -- "What measurable outcomes does the customer want? How would they measure success?"
  • Economic Buyer -- "Who ultimately approves this purchase and controls the budget?"
  • Decision Criteria -- "What are the must-haves vs. nice-to-haves driving the decision?"
  • Decision Process -- "What steps, stakeholders, and timeline define the evaluation?"
  • Identify Pain -- "What is the cost of inaction? What happens if this problem persists?"
  • Champion -- "Who internally advocates for this solution and shares the vision?"

Discovery Questions by Category

Situation: Current process, existing tools/systems, team structure. Problem: What is working, what is not, frequency and severity of pain. Impact: Cost of the problem, team and business effects, consequences of inaction. Need: Ideal solution characteristics, priorities, required timeline.

Qualification Scorecard

CriteriaScore (1-5)Notes
Budget
Authority
Need
Timeline
Champion
Competition
Total/30
  • 25-30: Strong opportunity -- prioritize and advance aggressively.
  • 18-24: Viable -- develop weak areas before proposal stage.
  • Below 18: Needs further qualification or deprioritize.

Pipeline Management

Weekly Pipeline Hygiene

  • Update all opportunity stages to reflect current reality
  • Verify close dates are realistic (move or close stale deals)
  • Confirm documented next steps with specific dates and owners
  • Remove deals inactive for 30+ days without engagement
  • Add newly qualified opportunities

Coverage Targets

Pipeline Coverage = Total Pipeline Value / Quota

  Early quarter: 4-5x coverage
  Mid quarter:   3x coverage
  Late quarter:  1.5-2x coverage

Forecast Categories

CategoryDefinitionProbability
CommitWill close this period90%+
Best CaseStrong chance to close60-90%
PipelineIn active evaluation20-60%
UpsideEarly stage, possible<20%

Negotiation Framework

Principles:

  1. Never negotiate against yourself -- wait for the counter, use silence.
  2. Trade, don't give -- "If I do X, will you commit to Y?"
  3. Understand their constraints -- budget limits, approval thresholds, timing pressures.
  4. Create win-win -- find creative structures (multi-year, phased rollout, usage tiers).

Objection Handling

ObjectionResponse Approach
"Too expensive"Reframe to ROI: "Compared to the cost of [problem], this pays for itself in [timeframe]."
"Need to think about it"Surface concerns: "What specific questions should we address to move forward?"
"Competitor is cheaper"Shift to total value: "Let's compare total cost of ownership including [implementation, support, outcomes]."
"Bad timing"Understand triggers: "What would need to change? Let's plan for when the timing is right."
"Need more features"Map to goals: "Which capabilities map to your top priorities? Let's focus there."

Discount Guidelines

Standard (0-10%):   AE authority, no approval needed.
Moderate (10-20%):  Manager approval, documented justification.
Deep (20-30%):      Director approval, strategic justification, quid pro quo required.
Exception (30%+):   VP approval, executive sponsor, documented business case.

Account Plan Template

# Account Plan: [Account Name]

## Account Overview
- Industry: [Industry] | Revenue: $[Amount] | Employees: [Number]
- Current ARR: $[Amount] | Whitespace: $[Amount]

## Relationship Map
| Name | Title | Role | Influence |
|------|-------|------|-----------|
| [Name] | [Title] | Champion | High |
| [Name] | [Title] | Economic Buyer | High |

## Strategy
- 90-day goals: [Goal 1], [Goal 2]
- 12-month goals: [Goal 1], [Goal 2]

## Action Plan
| Action | Owner | Due Date | Status |
|--------|-------|----------|--------|
| [Action] | [Name] | [Date] | [Status] |

## Risks
- [Risk]: [Mitigation plan]

Example: Deal Progression

Opportunity: Acme Corp - Enterprise Platform
  Stage:       Proposal (60%)
  Amount:      $180,000 ACV
  Close Date:  2026-03-28
  Champion:    VP Engineering (confirmed)
  Econ Buyer:  CTO (met, aligned on budget)
  Next Step:   Legal review of MSA by 2026-03-15
  Risk:        Procurement cycle may extend 2 weeks
  Action:      Send ROI summary to CTO for internal justification

Scripts

# Pipeline analyzer
python scripts/pipeline_analyzer.py --data opportunities.csv

# Forecast calculator
python scripts/forecast.py --pipeline pipeline.csv --quarter Q4

# Win/loss analyzer
python scripts/win_loss.py --deals closed_deals.csv

# Account planner
python scripts/account_plan.py --account "Account Name"

Troubleshooting

ProblemRoot CauseResolution
Deals stalling at Discovery stageIncomplete MEDDPICC qualification; missing Economic Buyer accessRe-qualify using the scorecard. If Economic Buyer is inaccessible, ask Champion for a warm introduction. Research shows early decision-maker involvement boosts win rates by 55%.
Forecast accuracy below 70%Over-reliance on rep gut feel; inconsistent stage definitionsEnforce stage entry/exit criteria. Require documented next steps with dates. Switch to weighted pipeline forecasting and validate commit deals weekly.
Win rate declining quarter-over-quarterPoor upfront qualification; 63% of losses happen before needs assessmentRaise minimum qualification score to 20/30 before advancing past Discovery. Implement mandatory MEDDPICC field updates at every stage gate.
Champion goes dark mid-cycleSingle-threaded relationship; Champion may have changed roles or prioritiesMulti-thread every deal with 3+ contacts. Reach out to other mapped stakeholders within 48 hours. Refresh the relationship map monthly.
Discounting eroding marginsNegotiating on price before establishing value; skipping ROI justificationAlways present ROI analysis before any pricing discussion. Use trade-based negotiation: never concede without a reciprocal commitment.
Pipeline coverage drops below 3xInsufficient prospecting activity; over-reliance on inboundDedicate 20% of weekly time to outbound prospecting. Set minimum weekly meeting targets. Review pipeline coverage every Monday.
Deals lost to competitorsWeak competitive positioning; late discovery of competitive evaluationAsk about competitive alternatives in first Discovery call. Prepare battle cards and landmine questions. Engage sales engineering early for technical differentiation.

Success Criteria

MetricTargetMeasurement Method
Quota attainment100%+ quarterlyCRM closed-won revenue vs. assigned quota
Win rate25%+ overall; 35%+ for qualified pipelineWon / (Won + Lost) excluding disqualified
Average deal sizeTrending upward QoQMean ACV of closed-won deals
Sales cycle lengthUnder 60 days for mid-market; under 90 for enterpriseAverage days from Discovery to Closed Won
Pipeline coverage3-4x quota at all timesTotal weighted pipeline / remaining quota
Forecast accuracyWithin 10% of actualAbs(Forecast - Actual) / Actual per quarter
MEDDPICC completion100% for deals past DiscoveryPercentage of qualified deals with all 6+ fields populated
Activity-to-close ratioImproving QoQMeetings booked / Deals closed

Scope & Limitations

In Scope:

  • Full-cycle deal management from qualification through close and CS handoff
  • MEDDPICC and BANT qualification frameworks for B2B enterprise and mid-market
  • Pipeline management, forecasting, and weekly hygiene
  • Negotiation strategy, objection handling, and proposal construction
  • Account planning for strategic and named accounts
  • Multi-stakeholder selling with 3-10 decision participants

Out of Scope:

  • Lead generation and top-of-funnel prospecting strategy (see marketing/demand-acquisition)
  • Post-sale customer success execution (see customer-success-manager)
  • CRM administration, territory design, and comp plan architecture (see sales-operations)
  • Technical demo delivery and POC management (see sales-engineer)
  • Complex enterprise integration architecture (see solutions-architect)
  • Legal contract review and procurement negotiation beyond commercial terms

Limitations:

  • Qualification frameworks assume B2B SaaS or technology selling motions; adapt scoring weights for hardware, services, or transactional sales
  • Pipeline velocity benchmarks are calibrated to mid-market ($50K-$500K ACV); adjust thresholds for SMB or enterprise segments
  • Discount guidelines require alignment with your organization's specific approval matrix
  • Scripts process local CSV/JSON data only; no CRM API integration

Integration Points

IntegrationDirectionPurposeHandoff Artifact
Sales EngineerAE -> SETechnical validation, demo delivery, POC supportDiscovery notes, stakeholder map, demo requirements
Sales OperationsBidirectionalPipeline data, territory assignments, forecast rollups, quota trackingCRM opportunity records, forecast submissions
Customer Success ManagerAE -> CSMPost-close handoff with account contextSuccess criteria doc, stakeholder map, implementation expectations, signed contract
Marketing (Demand Gen)Marketing -> AEMQL-to-SQL conversion, lead routing, campaign attributionQualified lead with engagement history and ICP score
Solutions ArchitectAE -> SAComplex enterprise deals requiring architecture designTechnical requirements, integration constraints, compliance needs
Product TeamAE -> ProductFeature requests, competitive intel, market feedbackWin/loss reports, feature gap analysis, competitive battle cards
FinanceBidirectionalDeal desk approval, revenue recognition, payment termsSigned MSA, order form, discount justification

Workflow Handoff Protocol:

  1. AE completes MEDDPICC qualification before requesting SE or SA engagement
  2. AE submits forecast to Sales Ops weekly by end-of-day Friday
  3. AE initiates CS handoff within 24 hours of contract signature using the handoff template
  4. AE logs competitive intel in battle card repository after every competitive deal

Reference Materials

  • references/discovery.md -- Discovery framework
  • references/negotiation.md -- Negotiation tactics
  • references/objections.md -- Objection handling
  • references/forecasting.md -- Forecasting best practices

平台分布

Claude Code

26.48%
按下载量换算308

Gemini CLI

26.31%
按下载量换算306

Antigravity

18.8%
按下载量换算218

OpenCode

12.9%
按下载量换算150

Cursor

8.91%
按下载量换算104

windsurf

3.84%
按下载量换算45

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills