Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

accessibility-checker(可访问性检查器)

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段;涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

accessibility-checker 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 7,977。

总安装 324周安装 13GitHub Stars 8下载 105核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:accessibility-checker(可访问性检查器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator
仓库路径:skills/accessibility-checker
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill accessibility-checker
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill accessibility-checker

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

自动检测代码和元素中的可访问性问题。聚焦语义结构、键盘操作、色彩对比及 ARIA 属性等核心无障碍维度。提供快速反馈与修复建议,适用于组件级或局部范围的检查场景。应配合真实页面测试,不可仅依赖静态文本判断结果准确性。accessibility-checker 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/accessibility-checker

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill accessibility-ch…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

accessibility-checker 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kanopi/cms-cultivator --skill accessibility-checker。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

accessibility-checker 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

accessibility-checker 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

accessibility-checker 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

accessibility-checker 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 324 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 105 次,GitHub 8 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

accessibility-checker 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
accessibility-checker

可访问性检查器 · 本页

3248需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Accessibility Checker

Automatically check code and elements for accessibility issues.

Accessibility Philosophy

Accessibility is not a checklist—it's a mindset of inclusive design.

Core Beliefs

  1. Universal Design: Build for everyone from the start, not as an afterthought
  2. Progressive Enhancement: Core functionality works for all, enhancements are optional
  3. Semantic First: Meaningful HTML structure over ARIA workarounds
  4. Real Users: Test with actual assistive technology users when possible

Scope Balance

  • Quick checks (this skill): Fast feedback on specific components (60-70% of issues)
  • Comprehensive audits (/audit-a11y command): Full site analysis with parallel specialists (85-90% coverage)
  • Manual testing: Keyboard, screen readers, user testing (catches remaining 10-15%, irreplaceable)

This skill provides rapid feedback during development. For production readiness, use comprehensive audits + manual testing.

When to Use This Skill

Activate this skill when the user:

  • Asks "is this accessible?"
  • Shows an element and asks "does this meet WCAG?"
  • Mentions "accessibility issue", "a11y", or "screen reader"
  • Asks "will this work for keyboard users?"
  • Questions contrast, ARIA, alt text, or form labels
  • Says "check this for accessibility"

Decision Framework

Before checking accessibility, assess:

What Element Type Is This?

  1. Interactive (buttons, links, forms) → Check keyboard access, focus indicators, ARIA
  2. Content (text, headings, images) → Check contrast, hierarchy, alt text
  3. Structure (navigation, landmarks) → Check semantic HTML, skip links
  4. Dynamic (modals, dropdowns, tabs) → Check keyboard traps, ARIA states
  5. Media (images, video, audio) → Check captions, transcripts, alt text

What WCAG Level Is Required?

WCAG 2.1 Level AA (industry standard):

  • ✅ Color contrast: 4.5:1 (normal text), 3:1 (large text)
  • ✅ Keyboard navigation: All functionality accessible
  • ✅ Focus indicators: Visible on all interactive elements
  • ✅ Form labels: All inputs have associated labels
  • ✅ Alt text: Meaningful for content images, empty for decorative

WCAG AAA (enhanced):

  • Higher contrast ratios (7:1 for normal text)
  • More stringent requirements

What's the Scope?

  • Single element - User shows specific component → Check that element
  • Page section - User mentions component → Check related elements
  • Entire page - User says "check this page" → Full page audit
  • Interactive flow - User shows user journey → Test keyboard flow

What Are Common Issues?

Quick wins (easy to fix):

  • Missing alt text on images
  • Low contrast text
  • Missing form labels
  • Missing focus indicators

Complex issues (need design changes):

  • Keyboard traps
  • Complex ARIA patterns
  • Dynamic content announcements
  • Touch target sizes

What Testing Method?

  1. Code review → Check semantic HTML, ARIA attributes
  2. Manual keyboard test → Tab through page, test interactions
  3. Contrast calculation → Calculate exact ratios
  4. Screen reader test → Test with VoiceOver/NVDA (if comprehensive audit)
  5. Automated tools → Run axe-core or pa11y (for full audits)

Decision Tree

User asks about accessibility
    ↓
Identify element type (interactive/content/structure)
    ↓
Determine WCAG level (AA standard)
    ↓
Check specific criteria (contrast/keyboard/ARIA)
    ↓
Test manually if needed
    ↓
Report issues with confidence scores
    ↓
Provide exact fixes (colors, ARIA, HTML)

Best Practices

DO:

  • ✅ Use semantic HTML5 elements first (header, nav, main, article, button, etc.)
  • ✅ Provide visible labels for all form controls (label element, not placeholder)
  • ✅ Ensure 4.5:1 contrast for normal text, 3:1 for large text (WCAG AA)
  • ✅ Make all interactive elements keyboard accessible (tab, enter, space, arrows)
  • ✅ Provide text alternatives for non-text content (alt, aria-label, captions)
  • ✅ Test with keyboard only (no mouse) before submitting
  • ✅ Use ARIA to enhance, not replace, semantic HTML
  • ✅ Ensure focus indicators are visible (2px minimum, high contrast)
  • ✅ Structure content with proper heading hierarchy (h1 → h2 → h3)

DON'T:

  • ❌ Use div/span with click handlers instead of button/link
  • ❌ Rely on color alone to convey information
  • ❌ Use placeholder as label replacement
  • ❌ Trap keyboard focus in modals without escape mechanism
  • ❌ Hide content with display:none when it should be screen-reader accessible
  • ❌ Use positive tabindex (tabindex="1", "2", etc.) - breaks natural tab order
  • ❌ Add ARIA when semantic HTML would suffice
  • ❌ Remove focus outlines without providing alternative indicators
  • ❌ Auto-play media without user control
  • ❌ Use complex ARIA patterns when simple alternatives exist

Quick Checks

This skill performs focused accessibility checks on specific elements, unlike /audit-a11y which does comprehensive site-wide audits.

Common Checks

Button Accessibility:

  • Has accessible name (text, aria-label, or aria-labelledby)
  • Keyboard focusable
  • Proper ARIA role if custom button
  • Sufficient color contrast

Form Accessibility:

  • All inputs have associated labels
  • Error messages properly linked
  • Required fields indicated
  • Fieldsets for related inputs

Image Accessibility:

  • Alt text present and descriptive
  • Decorative images have alt=""
  • Complex images have detailed descriptions

Link Accessibility:

  • Descriptive link text (not "click here")
  • Links distinguishable from text
  • Keyboard accessible

Response Format

## Accessibility Check: [Element Type]

### ✅ Passes
- Has proper ARIA label
- Keyboard accessible
- Sufficient color contrast (4.8:1)

### ❌ Issues Found
1. **Missing focus indicator** (WCAG 2.4.7 Level AA)
   - Current: No visible focus state
   - Fix: Add `:focus` styles with outline

2. **Low contrast** (WCAG 1.4.3 Level AA)
   - Current: 3.2:1
   - Required: 4.5:1
   - Fix: Use darker text color #333

### Suggested Code

[Provide fixed code example]

Common Issues by Component Type

Forms

  • Missing elements (use for attribute)
  • Placeholder as label (violates 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions)
  • No error messages associated (use aria-describedby)
  • Required fields not marked (use required + aria-required)

Modals/Dialogs

  • No focus trap (keyboard escapes modal)
  • No ESC key handler (violates 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap)
  • Missing role="dialog" or role="alertdialog"
  • No aria-labelledby pointing to title
  • Focus not moved to modal on open

Buttons/Links

  • Div/span with onClick (use or)
  • No visible label (use text content or aria-label)
  • Button used for navigation (use)
  • Link used for action (use)

Images

  • Missing alt attribute (violates 1.1.1 Non-text Content)
  • Decorative images with alt text (should be alt="")
  • Complex images without long description (use aria-describedby)
  • Icon buttons without text alternative (use aria-label)

Integration with /audit-a11y Command

  • This Skill: Quick element-specific checks

- "Is this button accessible?" - "Check this form for a11y" - Single component analysis

  • /audit-a11y Command: Comprehensive site audit

- Full WCAG 2.1 Level AA audit - Multiple pages analyzed - Detailed compliance reports

Resources

平台分布

Cursor

30.59%
按下载量换算32

weavefox

24.47%
按下载量换算26

Codex

18.15%
按下载量换算19

Claude Code

11.11%
按下载量换算12

Antigravity

4.66%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills