Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

acceptance-criteria-verification验收标准验证

Agent Skill

acceptance-criteria-verification 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

582

周安装

25

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

204
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:acceptance-criteria-verification(验收标准验证)
来源仓库:https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/acceptance-criteria-verification
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill acceptance-criteria-verification
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill acceptance-criteria-verification

简介

用于系统化验证每个验收标准,确保实现符合预期,提供结构化的验证报告。

  • 适用于端到端测试、API 集成检查、浏览器自动化或视觉比对等场景,覆盖多种验证方式。
  • 支持从 Issue 中提取标准,规划验证步骤,并生成可追踪的测试证据,避免虚假完成声明。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill acceptance-criteria-verification
  • 需确认项目是否具备测试环境、浏览器驱动或 API 访问权限,避免因依赖缺失导致验证失败。

SKILL.md

Acceptance Criteria Verification

Overview

Systematically verify each acceptance criterion and post structured reports.

Core principle: Every criterion verified. Every verification documented.

Announce at start: "I'm using acceptance-criteria-verification to verify the implementation."

The Verification Process

Step 1: Extract Criteria

Read the issue and extract all acceptance criteria:

# Get issue body
gh issue view [ISSUE_NUMBER] --json body -q '.body'

Parse out criteria (look for - [] or - [x] patterns in acceptance criteria section).

Step 2: Plan Verification

For each criterion, determine:

CriterionTest TypeHow to Verify
[Criterion 1]Unit testRun specific test
[Criterion 2]IntegrationAPI call + response check
[Criterion 3]E2EBrowser automation
[Criterion 4]ManualVisual inspection

Step 3: Execute Verification

For each criterion, run the appropriate verification:

Unit/Integration Tests

# Run specific tests
pnpm test --grep "[test pattern]"

# Or run test file
pnpm test path/to/specific.test.ts

E2E Tests

# If using Playwright
npx playwright test [test file]

# If using browser automation MCP
# Use mcp__playwright or mcp__puppeteer

Manual Verification

For criteria requiring visual or interactive verification:

  1. Start the application
  2. Navigate to relevant area
  3. Perform the action
  4. Capture screenshot if relevant
  5. Document result

Step 4: Record Results

For each criterion, record:

Criterion: [Text from issue]
Status: PASS | FAIL | PARTIAL | SKIP
Evidence: [Test output, screenshot, observation]
Notes: [Any relevant details]

Step 5: Post Verification Report

Post a structured comment to the issue:

gh issue comment [ISSUE_NUMBER] --body "## Verification Report

**Run**: $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)
**By**: agent
**Commit**: $(git rev-parse --short HEAD)
**Branch**: $(git branch --show-current)

### Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Notes |
|---|-----------|--------|-------|
| 1 | [Criterion text] | PASS | [Notes] |
| 2 | [Criterion text] | FAIL | [What failed] |
| 3 | [Criterion text] | PARTIAL | [What works, what doesn't] |

### Summary

| Status | Count |
|--------|-------|
| PASS | X |
| FAIL | X |
| PARTIAL | X |
| SKIP | X |
| **Total** | **X** |

### Test Output

<details>
<summary>Test Results</summary>

\`\`\`
[test output here]
\`\`\`

</details>

### Next Steps

- [ ] [Action items for failures/partials]
"

Step 6: Update Issue Checkboxes

For each passing criterion, check it off in the issue body:

# Get current body
BODY=$(gh issue view [ISSUE_NUMBER] --json body -q '.body')

# Update checkboxes for passing criteria
# (Implementation depends on body format)

# Update issue
gh issue edit [ISSUE_NUMBER] --body "$NEW_BODY"

Step 7: Update Project Fields

# Update project fields using project-status-sync skill

# Verification status
# - All PASS → Passing
# - Any FAIL → Failing
# - Mix of PASS/PARTIAL → Partial

# Criteria Met count
# - Count of PASS criteria

# Last Verified
# - Current date

# Verified By
# - "agent"

Status Definitions

StatusMeaningAction
PASSCriterion fully met, verified workingCheck off in issue
FAILCriterion not met, requires fixDocument what failed, return to development
PARTIALWorks with issues, needs improvementDocument issues, may need fix
SKIPCould not verify (blocked, N/A, etc.)Document reason

E2E Verification Best Practices

When using browser automation:

  1. Start fresh - New browser session for each verification
  2. Capture evidence - Screenshots at key points
  3. Check visible state - Not just DOM, but visible rendering
  4. Test error cases - Not just happy path
  5. Clean up - Close sessions after verification
// Example verification flow (pseudo-code)
await page.goto(appUrl);
await page.click('[data-testid="new-chat"]');
await page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="chat-input"]');
await page.screenshot({ path: 'new-chat-verification.png' });
// Verify expected state
const title = await page.title();
expect(title).toContain('New Chat');

Handling Failures

When criteria fail:

  1. Document specifically what failed
  2. Include reproduction steps if not obvious
  3. Capture error messages or screenshots
  4. Return to development to fix
  5. Re-run verification after fix

Do NOT:

  • Mark as PASS when it failed
  • Skip verification because "it should work"
  • Ignore intermittent failures

Verification Checklist

Before completing verification:

  • All acceptance criteria evaluated
  • Each criterion has clear PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL/SKIP status
  • Evidence captured for each (test output, screenshots)
  • Verification report posted to issue
  • Issue checkboxes updated for passing criteria
  • Project fields updated
  • If any failures, next steps documented

After Verification

Based on results:

Overall ResultNext Action
All PASSProceed to code review
Any FAILReturn to development, fix, re-verify
Partial onlyDiscuss with user - acceptable or needs fix?

Integration

This skill is called by:

  • issue-driven-development - Step 8

This skill calls:

  • project-status-sync - Update verification fields
  • issue-lifecycle - Post comments

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Gemini CLI

26.43%
按下载量换算54

Antigravity

23.42%
按下载量换算48

Claude Code

17.75%
按下载量换算36

Codex

11.31%
按下载量换算23

Cursor

6.98%
按下载量换算14

kiro-cli

3.49%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills