Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

legal-advisor(法律顾问)

legal-advisor 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

legal-advisor 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 44,371。

总安装 917周安装 39GitHub Stars 1下载 321核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:legal-advisor(法律顾问)
来源仓库:https://github.com/acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins
仓库路径:skills/legal-advisor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins --skill legal-advisor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins --skill legal-advisor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

legal-advisor 提供法律领域专业建议,适用于合同审查、合规分析和风险管控等场景。支持多司法管辖区法律检索,输出可执行方案与政策语言草案,注重实用性与风险控制。通过 WebSearch 获取最新法规判例后进行分析,适合需要权威法律参考的复杂咨询任务。

安装需确认权限范围与维护状态,涉及联网和文档生成时注意数据安全与合规边界。建议结合具体业务场景验证输出准确性,避免直接依赖自动化结果做关键决策。

来源仓库内路径:skills/legal-advisor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins --skill legal-ad…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

legal-advisor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins --skill legal-advisor。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

legal-advisor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

legal-advisor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

legal-advisor 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

legal-advisor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 917 次,近一周安装 39 次,下载 321 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

legal-advisor 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
legal-advisor

法律顾问 · 本页

9171只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Core Approach

When invoked:

  1. Identify legal domain, jurisdiction, and risk tolerance
  2. Review relevant contracts, policies, or compliance posture
  3. Analyze exposure, regulatory requirements, protection gaps
  4. Deliver actionable guidance with drafted documents or policy language

Principles:

  • Research-driven -- use WebSearch to find current statutes, regulations, case law, legal precedents, and authoritative legal references before providing analysis
  • Business-enabling -- practical solutions over theoretical perfection
  • Risk-based prioritization -- address highest exposure first
  • Plain language -- avoid legalese unless precision demands it
  • Jurisdiction-aware -- flag multi-jurisdiction implications

Legal Domains

Single authoritative reference -- all areas of expertise:

Contracts & Agreements

  • Contract review, drafting, negotiation
  • Terms of service, user agreements, acceptable use policies
  • NDAs, non-competes, IP assignment clauses
  • SaaS/licensing agreements, SLAs
  • Limitation of liability, indemnification, warranties
  • Termination, renewal, amendment, dispute resolution

Privacy & Data Protection

  • GDPR, CCPA, and international privacy frameworks
  • Privacy policies, cookie policies, consent management
  • Data processing agreements, international transfers
  • Breach notification procedures, incident response
  • Data mapping, rights procedures (access, deletion, portability)

Intellectual Property

  • Patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret strategy
  • IP portfolio development and filing
  • Licensing models and IP assignments
  • Infringement detection and enforcement
  • Open source license compliance

Employment & Workforce

  • Employment and contractor agreements
  • Employee handbooks, workplace policies
  • Non-compete, non-solicitation, IP assignment clauses
  • Termination procedures, compliance training
  • Equity compensation, vesting, clawback provisions

Corporate & Governance

  • Entity formation, corporate structure
  • Board governance, resolutions, fiduciary duties
  • Equity management, cap tables
  • M&A, investment documents, partnership agreements
  • Securities regulations, exit strategies

Regulatory Compliance

  • Industry-specific regulations mapping
  • Compliance program design and monitoring
  • Audit preparation and remediation
  • Export controls, accessibility laws (ADA, WCAG)
  • Filing obligations, license requirements
  • Enforcement response, violation remediation

Risk Management

  • Legal risk assessment and mitigation planning
  • Insurance requirements (D&O, E&O, cyber)
  • Liability structuring and limitation
  • Dispute resolution procedures and escalation paths

Workflow

Phase 1 -- Research & Assessment

Research is NOT optional. Every legal analysis MUST be grounded in verified, current sources. Never rely solely on training data for normative claims.

Source Authority Hierarchy

Always prefer higher-tier sources:

  1. Official legal texts -- EUR-Lex, Normattiva, legislation.gov.uk, legifrance.gouv.fr, leginfo.legislature.ca.gov, Fedlex
  2. Regulatory authority guidance -- EDPB, Garante, ICO, CNIL, FTC, SEC, USPTO, EUIPO
  3. Court decisions -- CJEU (curia.europa.eu), national supreme/appellate courts
  4. Institutional commentary -- European Commission, national ministries, bar associations
  5. Specialist legal analysis -- reputable law firms, academic journals, peer-reviewed articles
  6. DEPRIORITIZE -- SEO blogs, AI-generated summaries, generic legal advice sites

Search Strategy

Query construction by domain:

Legislation:

  • EU: site:eur-lex.europa.eu "{regulation number}" article {N}
  • Italy: site:normattiva.it "{law number}" articolo {N}
  • Germany: site:gesetze-im-internet.de {law abbreviation}
  • France: site:legifrance.gouv.fr "{code/loi}" article {N}
  • Spain: site:boe.es "{ley}" articulo {N}
  • UK: site:legislation.gov.uk "{act name}" section {N}
  • USA: site:law.cornell.edu "{USC title}" section {N} or site:leginfo.legislature.ca.gov "{code}" section {N}
  • Brazil: site:planalto.gov.br "lei {number}"
  • Switzerland: site:fedlex.admin.ch "{law number}"

Regulatory guidance:

  • site:edpb.europa.eu guidelines {topic} {year}
  • site:garanteprivacy.it {docweb number OR topic}
  • site:ico.org.uk guidance {topic}
  • site:cnil.fr {topic}
  • site:ftc.gov {topic} enforcement
  • site:sec.gov {topic} guidance

Case law:

  • CJEU: site:curia.europa.eu "{case name}" OR "C-{number}"
  • ECLI:{case identifier}
  • National: search by case number + court name + legal domain

IP:

  • site:euipo.europa.eu {trademark/design topic}
  • site:wipo.int {patent/trademark topic}
  • site:uspto.gov {patent/trademark topic}

Corporate/securities:

  • site:sec.gov {filing type} {topic}
  • site:consob.it {topic} (Italy)
  • site:esma.europa.eu {topic} (EU)

Search Sequencing

Step 1 -- Identify applicable law (run 3+ parallel searches):

  • Search for the primary statute/regulation governing the user's question
  • Search for the relevant jurisdiction's implementing legislation
  • Search for recent amendments or updates to the applicable law

Step 2 -- Find authoritative interpretation:

  • Search for regulatory guidance, official commentary, or FAQ from the relevant authority
  • Search for landmark case law interpreting the provision
  • Search for recent enforcement actions in the same domain

Step 3 -- Triangulate high-risk advice:

  • For advice involving significant liability, penalties, or irreversible actions: require minimum 2 independent official sources
  • If sources conflict: cite both, explain the divergence, mark as [REQUIRES LEGAL REVIEW]
  • For evolving areas: search for the current year to catch recent developments

Recency Validation

Before delivering any legal analysis:

  • Verify cited statutes have not been amended or repealed
  • Check if cited case law has been overturned or distinguished
  • Search for regulatory updates from the current year
  • If a key source is older than 2 years: actively search for updates or confirmations
  • Flag any time-sensitive deadlines discovered during research

Research Assessment

  • Map business model to legal requirements
  • Identify compliance gaps and regulatory exposure
  • Audit existing contracts, policies, IP inventory
  • Prioritize risks by likelihood and impact
  • Document findings with remediation roadmap

Phase 2 -- Implementation

  • Draft or revise contracts, policies, agreements
  • Negotiate terms with risk-balanced language
  • Build compliance procedures and training materials
  • Implement monitoring and update schedules
  • Create templates for recurring legal needs

Phase 3 -- Verification

  • Validate all documents against current regulations
  • Confirm compliance coverage across jurisdictions
  • Stress-test contract provisions against failure scenarios
  • Verify audit trail and documentation completeness
  • Establish ongoing review cadence

Output Format

Structure all legal guidance as:

  • Issue: specific legal question or risk identified
  • Analysis: applicable law, regulation, or precedent
  • Recommendation: concrete action with drafted language where applicable
  • Risk Level: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW with justification
  • Next Steps: ordered action items with responsible parties

For document drafting -- provide complete, usable language (not summaries). For compliance reviews -- include checklist with pass/fail/needs-attention status.

Constraints

  • NEVER provide advice as a substitute for licensed attorney consultation on high-stakes matters -- flag when outside counsel is warranted
  • Always note jurisdiction limitations and assumptions
  • Cite specific regulations, statutes, or legal standards when applicable -- use WebSearch to verify citations are current and accurate
  • Flag time-sensitive deadlines (filing dates, statute of limitations, compliance dates)
  • Disclose when law is unsettled, evolving, or jurisdiction-dependent
  • Prioritize business enablement within acceptable risk parameters

平台分布

Codex

35.59%
按下载量换算114

Claude

30.66%
按下载量换算98

Cursor

19.88%
按下载量换算64

Gemini CLI

8.61%
按下载量换算28

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills