Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

sales-enablement(销售支持)

sales-enablement 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

sales-enablement 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 37,859。

总安装 1,656周安装 69GitHub Stars 134下载 552核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sales-enablement(销售支持)
来源仓库:https://github.com/absolutelyskilled/absolutelyskilled
仓库路径:skills/sales-enablement
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/absolutelyskilled/absolutelyskilled --skill sales-enablement
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/absolutelyskilled/absolutelyskilled --skill sales-enablement

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

sales-enablement 提供销售团队所需的内容工具与竞争情报支持体系。适用于创建战情卡、案例研究与 ROI 计算器以提升客户转化效率。覆盖售前材料结构化、异议应对策略及培训计划设计全流程。输出内容应贴合实际客户旅程,避免脱离场景的通用话术堆砌。涉及敏感信息或竞品对比时,需遵循企业合规政策进行脱敏处理。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sales-enablement

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/absolutelyskilled/absolutelyskilled --skill sa…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

sales-enablement 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/absolutelyskilled/absolutelyskilled --skill sales-enable…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sales-enablement 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sales-enablement 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

sales-enablement 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

sales-enablement 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,656 次,近一周安装 69 次,下载 552 次,GitHub 134 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sales-enablement 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
sales-enablement

销售支持 · 本页

1,656134需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

When this skill is activated, always start your first response with the 🧢 emoji.

Sales Enablement

Sales enablement is the discipline of giving sales teams the content, tools, and knowledge they need to effectively engage buyers at every stage of the purchasing journey. The core idea is that reps should spend time selling, not hunting for materials or improvising answers to objections they have seen a hundred times before. This skill covers how to build, structure, and maintain the assets that make a sales team consistently effective: battle cards, case studies, ROI calculators, competitive intelligence briefs, product one-pagers, and training programs.


When to use this skill

Trigger this skill when the user:

  • Asks to create or update a battle card for a product or competitor
  • Needs a competitive intelligence brief or analysis
  • Wants to write a customer case study or success story
  • Asks to build an ROI or business value calculator
  • Needs a product one-pager or sales leave-behind
  • Wants to design or structure a sales training program
  • Asks for help with product positioning for a sales audience
  • Needs to measure or improve sales enablement effectiveness

Do NOT trigger this skill for:

  • Marketing campaign copy or demand generation (audience is buyers, not reps)
  • Product roadmap or engineering documentation (use product-management skills instead)

Key principles

  1. Sales-ready, not marketing-pretty - Sales collateral must be scannable in 30 seconds and answerable in a live call. Dense prose, brand storytelling, and visual polish matter less than clarity, speed, and objection coverage. If a rep can't use it under pressure, it will never leave the folder.
  2. Update quarterly or it's stale - Competitive landscapes, pricing, and product capabilities shift constantly. A battle card with outdated win rates or features that no longer exist actively hurts deals. Schedule a quarterly review cycle and treat outdated content as a blocker, not a to-do.
  3. One page per asset - Every piece of enablement content should fit on one printed page or one screen without scrolling. If it doesn't fit, split it into two assets. Length signals effort to the creator; brevity signals respect for the reader's time under pressure.
  4. Arm for objections, not just features - The job of enablement content is to prepare reps for the moments they feel vulnerable: "Your competitor does this for half the price," "We already have a solution for that," "We'll revisit next quarter." Every asset should include the three most common objections reps hear and a proven response to each.
  5. Measure usage and impact - Enablement content that is never opened cannot drive revenue. Track view rates, download counts, content usage by deal stage, and win rates for deals where content was used versus not. Cull assets that go unused and double down on those that correlate with wins.

Core concepts

Enablement content types

AssetPrimary useLengthUpdate cadence
Battle cardLive competitive calls1 pageQuarterly
Case studyLate-stage proof1-2 pagesAs new wins occur
ROI calculatorBusiness case / CFO1 spreadsheetSemi-annually
Product one-pagerDiscovery and demos1 pageWith major releases
Competitive briefDeep research3-5 pagesQuarterly
Sales playbookNew hire ramp / coaching10-20 pagesAnnually
Objection handlerOngoing coaching1-2 pagesQuarterly

Buyer journey mapping

Align content to where the buyer is in their decision process:

  • Awareness - Buyer has a problem but no solution in mind. Use thought leadership, industry data, and problem-framing one-pagers.
  • Consideration - Buyer is evaluating solutions. Use competitive battle cards, feature comparison sheets, and analyst summaries.
  • Decision - Buyer is choosing a vendor. Use case studies, ROI calculators, security/compliance docs, and reference call frameworks.
  • Post-sale - Buyer becomes a customer. Use onboarding guides, expansion plays, and renewal decks.

Competitive positioning

Effective competitive positioning is not about tearing down competitors. It is about making the choice obvious for the right buyer. Build positioning on four pillars:

  1. Where we win - Deal types, company sizes, industries, or use cases where the product is the clear best fit.
  2. Where they win - Honest assessment of situations where a competitor is a better fit. Reps who acknowledge this build trust; reps who deny it lose deals.
  3. Key differentiators - Three to five concrete, provable differences - not "we are more innovative" but "we process transactions in under 50ms vs their documented 200ms average."
  4. Trap questions - Discovery questions that expose competitor weaknesses and pull the conversation toward your strengths.

Win/loss analysis

Win/loss analysis is the feedback loop that makes all other enablement content accurate. Conduct structured interviews within two weeks of closing or losing a deal:

  • Why did the buyer choose us / not choose us?
  • Which competitors were in the deal? What did they say about them?
  • Which objections came up? How were they handled?
  • What content did the rep use? Was it helpful?

Feed findings back into battle cards, objection handlers, and training within 30 days.


Common tasks

Create a battle card

Use the template in references/battle-card-template.md. Key sections:

  1. One-line pitch - Why choose us over this competitor in one sentence.
  2. Where we win - Three to five deal types or buyer profiles where we are the stronger choice.
  3. Where they win - One to two honest scenarios. Omitting this makes the card look like propaganda and trains reps to be blindsided.
  4. Top objections and responses - The three objections reps hear most in competitive deals, each with a validated response from a rep who has won that exchange.
  5. Trap questions - Two or three discovery questions that surface needs your product addresses better.
  6. Key differentiators - Concrete, provable, and ideally third-party validated.
  7. Do not say - Phrases or claims that are inaccurate, legally risky, or that consistently backfire in deals.

Write a case study

Use the Problem-Solution-Result framework:

CUSTOMER: [Name], [industry], [size]
CHALLENGE: One paragraph. What specific problem were they trying to solve?
           Include the business impact of NOT solving it (cost, risk, lost time).
SOLUTION: One paragraph. What did they implement and how? Focus on capabilities
          used, not product marketing language.
RESULTS: Three to five bullet points with quantified outcomes.
         - Reduced onboarding time from 6 weeks to 10 days
         - Saved $340k annually in manual processing costs
         - Increased NPS from 32 to 67 within 90 days
QUOTE: One direct quote from the economic buyer or champion, attributed to name
       and title, that captures the business value in their words.

Validation rules: Every number must be approved by the customer. Every quote must be attributed. Every case study must go through legal review before external use.

Build an ROI calculator

ROI calculators must answer three questions for a CFO:

  1. What does the problem cost today? - Quantify the status quo in dollars. Hours wasted * loaded salary rate, error rates * average cost per error, churn caused by the problem * average contract value.
  2. What does the solution cost? - License cost + implementation + training + ongoing admin. Be honest. Buyers will find the hidden costs anyway.
  3. What is the net return and payback period? - (Annual benefit - annual cost) / annual cost = ROI%. Break-even month = total investment / monthly benefit.

Build the model in a spreadsheet with clearly labeled input cells (highlighted yellow) and output cells. Every assumption should be visible and editable. Provide conservative, base, and optimistic scenario columns.

Develop competitive intelligence briefs

Structure a competitive intelligence brief in five sections:

  1. Company overview - Size, funding, recent news, strategic direction.
  2. Product comparison - Feature-by-feature table with honest ratings (strong / comparable / weak) for both products.
  3. Pricing and packaging - What is known publicly; estimated ranges from deal data; typical discounting patterns.
  4. Sales tactics - How they sell: FUD they spread, discounting triggers, pressure tactics reps have encountered.
  5. How to beat them - Specific deal strategy, trap questions, and references to relevant battle card.

Sources: competitor website, G2/Gartner reviews, job postings (reveal roadmap priorities), LinkedIn, customer interviews, and your own deal notes.

Create product one-pagers

A product one-pager is not a datasheet. It is a conversation starter for discovery calls and a leave-behind after demos. Structure:

  • Headline - Outcome the buyer gets, not product name or feature list.
  • The problem - Two sentences on the pain. Buyers should nod.
  • The solution - Three bullet points on what the product does.
  • Why us - Three differentiators with evidence.
  • Customer proof - One logo strip or one quote.
  • Call to action - Next step that is specific and low-friction.

Avoid: feature lists without context, internal jargon, and anything that requires a product manager to explain.

Design sales training program

Structure a training program around four competency areas:

  1. Product knowledge - What it does, how it works, common configurations. Tested via demo certification (rep must demo without a script).
  2. Competitive knowledge - Who the competitors are, where we win and lose. Tested via mock competitive call with objections thrown.
  3. Discovery skills - How to uncover business pain, quantify impact, map to stakeholders. Practiced via recorded discovery calls with feedback.
  4. Deal execution - How to build a mutual success plan, navigate procurement, create urgency ethically. Practiced via deal reviews.

Ramp milestone: rep should be fully certified and carrying quota by week eight. Each certification requires a practical demonstration, not just a quiz.

Measure enablement effectiveness

Track these metrics in a monthly review:

MetricWhat it measuresTarget
Content usage rate% of reps using assets in active deals> 60%
Asset open rate% of sent assets opened by buyers> 40%
Win rate with contentWin rate when asset used vs not> 10 pp lift
Time to rep productivityWeeks from start date to first closeTrend down
Competitive win rateWin rate in tracked competitive dealsTrack by competitor
Enablement NPSRep satisfaction with materials> 30

Review with sales leadership monthly. Drop assets below 20% usage. Investigate and replicate assets with strong win rate correlation.


Anti-patterns / common mistakes

MistakeWhy it's wrongWhat to do instead
Building for marketing, not repsLong-form PDFs and polished decks reps cannot use under pressureCo-create with reps; test every asset in a live role play before publishing
Ignoring where you loseOmitting competitor strengths makes cards feel like propaganda; reps get blindsidedInclude honest "where they win" sections; this builds rep credibility with buyers
One ROI model for all buyersA CFO and a VP of Engineering evaluate value differentlyBuild buyer-persona-specific calculators or clearly label which persona each model targets
Launching without trainingUploading content to a portal and expecting adoptionRun a 30-minute launch session; show reps when and how to use each asset
Treating enablement as a one-time projectContent is stale within months; stale content is worse than no contentPut quarterly review dates on every asset at creation time
Measuring output not outcomesReporting number of assets created instead of deals influencedTie every enablement initiative to a revenue or productivity metric from day one

Gotchas

  1. Battle card built without input from reps who've been in those deals - An enablement asset created by product marketing without validating objections against real deal data produces cards that look complete but fail in live calls. Validate every objection and response with at least two reps who have faced that competitor.
  2. ROI calculator with hidden or locked assumptions - If buyers can't see and edit the input assumptions, they distrust the output. A locked model that produces "you save $500k" with no visible math undermines credibility. Every assumption cell must be visible, labeled, and editable.
  3. Case study numbers not customer-approved - Publishing customer outcome numbers without explicit written approval is both a trust and legal risk. Every metric in an external case study needs sign-off from the customer's legal or PR team, not just the champion contact.
  4. Enablement content launched without a training session - Uploading assets to a portal and sending a Slack message does not drive adoption. Reps don't use content they weren't shown how and when to use. Run a 30-minute launch session with real deal scenarios before expecting content usage.
  5. Competitive intel briefs that don't include "where they win" - A battle card that only lists your strengths and the competitor's weaknesses reads as propaganda and trains reps to be blindsided. Honest "where they win" sections build rep credibility with buyers and prevent overconfidence in unsuitable deals.

References

For detailed content on specific topics, read the relevant file from references/:

  • references/battle-card-template.md - Full battle card structure with annotated examples and fill-in sections for each competitor

Only load a references file if the current task requires deep detail on that topic.


Companion check

On first activation of this skill in a conversation: check which companion skills are installed by running ls ~/.claude/skills/ ~/.agent/skills/ ~/.agents/skills/.claude/skills/.agent/skills/.agents/skills/ 2>/dev/null. Compare the results against the recommended_skills field in this file's frontmatter. For any that are missing, mention them once and offer to install: `` npx skills add AbsolutelySkilled/AbsolutelySkilled --skill <name> ` Skip entirely if recommended_skills` is empty or all companions are already installed.

平台分布

Codex

34.42%
按下载量换算190

Claude

28.28%
按下载量换算156

Cursor

18.06%
按下载量换算100

Gemini CLI

10.51%
按下载量换算58

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills