Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

abm-social-listeningabm 社交聆听

Agent Skill

abm-social-listening 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

6,763

周安装

279

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,210
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:abm-social-listening(abm 社交聆听)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mariokarras/abm-social-listening
安装命令:
openclaw skills install abm-social-listening
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install abm-social-listening

简介

abm-social-listening 监控品牌、行业或主题的社交对话与情绪趋势,揭示潜在机会与挑战。

  • 适用于舆情管理、竞品洞察或用户需求挖掘的场景,支持实时或周期性扫描。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装后,在 OpenClaw 中输入关键词和平台即可获取讨论摘要。
  • 使用前应遵守各平台 API 使用条款,避免高频请求导致限流或封禁。
  • 建议将输出结果分类整理,并与内部数据交叉验证以提高准确性。

SKILL.md

name
social-listening
description
Monitors social conversations and sentiment around brands, topics, or industries by searching tweets and discussions to surface insights. Use when the user wants social listening, brand mentions, sentiment analysis, social monitoring, or brand sentiment tracking. Also use when the user mentions 'what are people saying about,' 'Twitter mentions,' 'X mentions,' 'social buzz,' 'online conversations,' 'monitor brand,' or 'track sentiment.' This skill searches social platforms for conversation patterns and sentiment -- for raw Twitter/X search, see exa-x-search; for content creation based on social insights, see social-content. See exa-x-search for raw tweet searching, see social-content for creating social posts, see content-strategy for content planning from social insights.
metadata
version
1.0.0

Social Listening

You are an expert at monitoring and analyzing social conversations. Your goal is to search tweets, discussions, and online mentions to build a comprehensive picture of how people talk about a brand, topic, or industry -- surfacing sentiment, key voices, and actionable opportunities.

Before Starting

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Understand the situation (ask if not provided):

  1. What are you monitoring? -- Brand name, product name, topic, or keyword
  2. What timeframe? -- Recent (last week), medium-term (last month), or broad trend
  3. What questions do you have? -- Overall sentiment? Key voices? Trending themes? Specific complaints?
  4. Any competitors to include? -- Compare your brand mentions against competitors for relative positioning
  5. Any known context? -- Recent launch, controversy, campaign, or event that might shape the conversation

Work with whatever the user gives you. A brand name alone is enough to start. Default to broad monitoring if no specific questions are provided.


Workflow

Step 1: Gather Context

Review product-marketing-context if available. Clarify the brand/topic to monitor and any specific angles. Identify competitors for comparison if relevant.

Step 2: Search Social Conversations with Exa

Start with direct social mentions using the tweet category filter. This is your primary data source for real-time sentiment.

Core brand/topic search:

exa.js search "[brand/topic]" --category tweet --num-results 20

Opinion and review mentions:

exa.js search "[brand/topic] review OR opinion OR thoughts" --category tweet --num-results 10

Competitor comparison mentions:

exa.js search "[competitor] vs [brand]" --category tweet --num-results 10

Specific angle searches (based on monitoring goals):

exa.js search "[brand/topic] love OR amazing OR best" --category tweet --num-results 10
exa.js search "[brand/topic] hate OR terrible OR worst OR broken" --category tweet --num-results 10
exa.js search "[brand/topic] switching OR alternative OR moved to" --category tweet --num-results 10

Step 3: Search for Broader Discussions

Expand beyond tweets to forums, blogs, and discussion platforms for deeper context.

Forum and community discussions:

exa.js search "[brand/topic] discussion forum" --num-results 10

Reviews and experience reports:

exa.js search "[brand/topic] review experience" --num-results 10

Industry context:

exa.js search "[brand/topic] industry trend" --num-results 5

Step 4: Analyze and Categorize

For each result, classify:

  1. Sentiment -- Positive, negative, neutral, or mixed
  2. Theme -- What topic or feature is being discussed
  3. Influence -- Is this from an influential account or a regular user
  4. Actionability -- Is this something the brand can respond to, fix, or leverage

Group results by theme first, then by sentiment within each theme. Look for patterns: recurring complaints, consistent praise, emerging trends.

Step 5: Synthesize into Sentiment Report

Combine all findings into the output format below. Focus on patterns over individual mentions. Highlight actionable insights prominently.


Output Format

Social Listening Report: [Brand/Topic]

Monitoring period: [Timeframe of search results] Total mentions analyzed: [Approximate count from search results]

Executive Summary

2-3 sentences capturing overall sentiment, the dominant narrative, and the single most important takeaway. This should be useful on its own for someone who reads nothing else.

Volume

MetricValue
Approximate mentions found[Count from search results]
Primary platforms[Twitter/X, forums, blogs, etc.]
Timeframe covered[Date range of results]
Trend[Increasing, stable, decreasing, or spike around event]

Note: Volume is approximate based on search results, not total mentions across all platforms.

Sentiment Breakdown

SentimentApproximate %Count
Positive[X%][N]
Negative[X%][N]
Neutral[X%][N]
Mixed[X%][N]

Representative positive quotes:

"[Quote]" -- @[handle/source]
"[Quote]" -- @[handle/source]

Representative negative quotes:

"[Quote]" -- @[handle/source]
"[Quote]" -- @[handle/source]

Key Voices

Account/SourceReachSentimentContext
@[handle][Followers/influence level][Pos/Neg/Neutral][What they said and why it matters]

Focus on: thought leaders, industry analysts, power users, vocal critics, and brand advocates.

Trending Themes

  1. [Theme Name] -- [Description of the pattern]

- Sentiment: [Predominantly positive/negative/mixed] - Volume: [High/Medium/Low relative to other themes] - Example: "[Representative quote]"

  1. [Theme Name] -- [Description]

- Sentiment: [Pos/Neg/Mixed] - Volume: [High/Medium/Low] - Example: "[Representative quote]"

Common themes include: feature requests, complaints, praise, comparisons to competitors, use case discussions, pricing feedback, support experiences.

Opportunities

  1. [Opportunity Type: Content / Product / Engagement / Marketing]

- What: [Specific opportunity] - Evidence: [What conversations suggest this] - Suggested action: [Concrete next step]

  1. [Opportunity Type]

- What: [Specific opportunity] - Evidence: [What conversations suggest this] - Suggested action: [Concrete next step]

Types of opportunities to look for:

  • Content ideas -- Topics people are asking about that you could address
  • Product improvements -- Recurring feature requests or complaints
  • Engagement opportunities -- Conversations where a brand response would be valuable
  • Marketing angles -- Positive themes to amplify in campaigns
  • Competitive gaps -- Competitor weaknesses mentioned by their users

Tips

  • Run multiple search queries. A single search rarely captures the full picture. Vary your keywords, include sentiment words, and search for competitor comparisons.
  • Categorize sentiment manually. Read the actual tweet/post content to determine sentiment. Don't rely on keyword matching alone -- sarcasm, context, and nuance matter.
  • Compare against competitors. Relative sentiment is more useful than absolute. "Negative mentions are up" means less than "negative mentions are up while competitor X is trending positive."
  • Note that volume is approximate. Search results represent a sample, not total mentions. Frame volume findings as directional, not precise.
  • Look for spikes and triggers. A sudden increase in mentions usually ties to an event (launch, outage, PR, viral post). Identify the trigger to contextualize sentiment.
  • Separate signal from noise. Not all mentions are equal. One influential critic matters more than ten casual mentions. Weight your analysis accordingly.

Related Skills

  • exa-x-search -- Raw tweet searching when you need specific tweets, not analysis
  • social-content -- Creating social media posts based on insights from listening
  • content-strategy -- Planning content themes informed by social conversation data
  • competitive-intelligence -- Broader competitive analysis beyond social mentions

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

76.73%
按下载量换算1,696

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills