Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

debug-methodology(调试方法)

debug-methodology 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

debug-methodology 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 69,522。

总安装 218周安装 9GitHub Stars 19下载 71核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:debug-methodology(调试方法)
来源仓库:https://github.com/abczsl520/debug-methodology
仓库路径:skills/debug-methodology
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/abczsl520/debug-methodology --skill debug-methodology
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/abczsl520/debug-methodology --skill debug-methodology

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

debug-methodology 提供系统化调试与问题解决方法,基于生产事故与行业最佳实践提炼而成。适用于非直观问题的根因分析,强制通过 Root Cause Gate 验证,禁止仅做表面修复。使用前需明确实际问题与根本原因,并通过 5 Whys 法深入追问,确保解决方案消除源头而非掩盖症状。

建议结合具体故障场景应用该方法,避免跳过验证步骤,确保每次修复都经得起回归测试。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/debug-methodology

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/abczsl520/debug-methodology --skill debug-meth…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

debug-methodology 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/abczsl520/debug-methodology --skill debug-methodology。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

debug-methodology 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

debug-methodology 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

debug-methodology 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

debug-methodology 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 218 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 71 次,GitHub 19 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

debug-methodology 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
debug-methodology

调试方法 · 本页

21819需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Debug Methodology

Systematic approach to debugging and problem-solving. Distilled from real production incidents and industry best practices.

⚠️ The Root Cause Imperative

Every fix MUST target the root cause. Workarounds are forbidden unless explicitly approved.

Before proposing ANY solution, pass the Root Cause Gate:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│            ROOT CAUSE GATE                  │
│                                             │
│  1. What is the ACTUAL problem?             │
│  2. WHY does it happen? (not just WHAT)     │
│  3. Does my fix eliminate the WHY?           │
│     YES → proceed                           │
│     NO  → this is a workaround → STOP       │
│                                             │
│  Workaround test:                           │
│  "If I remove my fix, does the bug return?" │
│     YES → workaround (fix the cause instead)│
│     NO  → genuine fix ✅                    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

The 5 Whys — Mandatory for Non-Obvious Problems

Problem: API returns 524 timeout
  Why? → Cloudflare cuts connections >100s
  Why? → The API call takes >100s
  Why? → Using non-streaming request, server holds connection silent
  Why? → Code uses regular fetch, not streaming
  Fix: → Use streaming (server sends data continuously, Cloudflare won't cut)

  ❌ WRONG: Switch to faster model (workaround — avoids the timeout instead of fixing it)
  ✅ RIGHT: Use streaming API (root cause — Cloudflare needs ongoing data)

Common Workaround Traps

ProblemWorkaround (❌)Root Cause Fix (✅)
API timeoutSwitch to faster modelUse streaming / fix the slow query
Data precision lossSearch by name instead of IDFix BigInt parsing
Search returns nothingTry different search strategyFix the search implementation
Dependency conflictDowngrade / pin versionUse correct environment (venv)
Feature doesn't workRemove the featureDebug why it fails

Self-check question: "Am I solving the problem, or avoiding it?"

Phase 1: STOP — Assess Before Acting

Before ANY fix attempt:

□ What is the EXACT symptom? (error message, behavior, screenshot)
□ When did it last work? What changed since then?
□ How is the service running? (process, env, startup command)

For running services:

ps -p <PID> -o command=        # How was it started?
ls .venv/ venv/ env/           # Virtual environment?
which python3 && python3 --version
which node && node --version

NEVER restart a service without first recording its original startup command.

Phase 2: Hypothesize — Form ONE Theory

Priority order:

  1. Did I change something? → diff/revert first
  2. Did the environment change? → versions, deps, configs
  3. Did external inputs change? → API responses, data formats
  4. Genuine new bug? → only after ruling out 1-3

Phase 3: Test — One Change at a Time

Change X → Test → Works? → Done
                → Fails? → REVERT X → new hypothesis

Do NOT stack changes.

Phase 4: Patch-Chain Detection

2 fix attempts failed → STOP. Revert ALL. Back to Phase 1.

You are likely:

  • Fixing symptoms of a wrong fix
  • In the wrong environment entirely
  • Misunderstanding the architecture

Phase 5: Post-Fix Verification

After any fix, verify:

□ Does it solve the ORIGINAL problem? (not just silence the error)
□ Did I introduce new issues? (regression check)
□ Would removing my fix bring the bug back? (confirms causality)
□ Is the fix in the right layer? (not patching symptoms upstream)

Anti-Patterns

🚨 Workaround Addiction (NEW — Most Common!)

Bypassing the problem instead of fixing it. "It's slower but works" / "Use a different approach". → Ask: "Am I solving or avoiding?" If avoiding → find the real fix. → Workarounds are ONLY acceptable when: (1) explicitly approved by user, (2) clearly labeled as temporary, (3) a TODO is created for the real fix.

🚨 Drunk Man Anti-Pattern

Randomly changing things until the problem disappears. → Each change needs a hypothesis.

🚨 Streetlight Anti-Pattern

Looking where comfortable, not where the problem is. → "Is this where the bug IS, or where I KNOW HOW TO LOOK?"

🚨 Cargo Cult Fix

Copying a fix without understanding why it works. → Understand the mechanism first.

🚨 Ignoring the User

User says "it broke after you changed X" → immediately diff X. → User observations are the most valuable data.

Environment Checklist

□ Runtime: system or venv/nvm?
□ Dependencies: match expected versions?
□ Config: .env, config.json — recent changes?
□ Process manager: PM2/systemd — restart method?
□ Logs: tail -f before reproducing
□ Backup: snapshot before any change

Deployment Safety (Hardened SCP Flow)

Iron Rule: NEVER edit files directly on the server. NEVER overwrite server files without backup.

Standard deployment (every time, no exceptions):

1. PULL    scp server:/opt/apps/项目/ ./local-项目/
           (pull the files you need + related files)

2. EDIT    Make changes locally
           (complex multi-line → write full file, never sed)

3. VERIFY  node -c *.js                    # syntax check
           node -e "require('./file')"     # module load check
           (STOP if verification fails — do not proceed)

4. BACKUP  ssh server "cp file file.bak.$(date +%s)"

5. PUSH    scp ./local-file server:/opt/apps/项目/file

6. RESTART pm2 restart <app>
           (use SAME method as original — check ps/pm2 show first)

7. HEALTH  curl -s http://localhost:<port>/health
           pm2 logs <app> --lines 5 --nostream
           (if unhealthy → revert backup immediately)

Pull Scope Rules

Changing 1 file    → pull that file + its imports/importers
Changing routes    → also pull server.js (check mount points)
Changing frontend  → also pull index.html (check script tags)
Changing config    → also pull code that reads the config
Unsure what to pull → pull the whole project directory

What NOT to Do

❌ sed -i for multi-line code on server
❌ Skip node -c after editing .js
❌ pm2 restart before syntax verification
❌ Tell user to refresh before health check passes
❌ Push without backup

🚨 Server Code Modification Rules

Every code change on a server MUST be syntax-verified before restart/reload.

After editing .js files:
  □ node -c <file>                          # Syntax check
  □ node -e "require('./<file>')"           # Module load check (for route files)
  □ FAIL → DO NOT restart. DO NOT tell user to refresh. Fix first.

After editing .html files:
  □ Check critical tag closure (div/script/style)
  □ grep -c '<div' file && grep -c '</div' file   # Count match

Complex multi-line changes:
  □ Write complete file locally → scp upload
  □ NEVER use sed for multi-line code insertion (newlines get swallowed)
  □ If sed is unavoidable → verify with node -c immediately after

Restart sequence:
  □ node -c *.js passes → pm2 restart <app>
  □ Check pm2 logs --lines 5 for startup errors
  □ curl health endpoint to confirm service is up

Why: sed -i multi-line insertion silently corrupts JS (newlines become single line), causing syntax errors that break the entire page with no visible error to the user.

Decision Tree

Problem appears
  ├─ I just edited something? → DIFF → REVERT if suspect
  ├─ Service won't start? → CHECK startup command + env
  ├─ New error after fix? → STOP (patch chain!) → Revert → Phase 1
  ├─ User reports regression? → DIFF before/after
  ├─ Tempted to work around? → ROOT CAUSE GATE → fix the real issue
  └─ Intermittent? → CHECK logs + external deps + timing

平台分布

Codex

34.3%
按下载量换算24

Claude

30.03%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

16.25%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.5%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills