code-reviewer（代码审查员）

Code Reviewer

Overview

Comprehensive code review: General intelligence + MERN specialization.

Philosophy: Check project health FIRST, then dive into code. A 6,000-line file is a problem regardless of what's in it.

Review Workflow

Phase 0: Project Health (Do This First)

Before reading any code, assess project health:

1. Build status: Run tsc --noEmit or check for compilation errors
2. Project docs: Read README, any STATUS/BUGS/TODO files - look for deployment blockers
3. Test health: Do tests exist? Check package.json scripts, look for test directories
4. File sizes: find src -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" | xargs wc -l | sort -n | tail -20
5. Dependencies: Check for npm audit issues, unusual deps (Angular in React?)

Stop here if: Build is broken, docs say "DO NOT DEPLOY", or critical blockers found. Report immediately.

Phase 1: Scope Detection

1. Identify scope from context:

- Full repo → Broad review, sample key files - Feature/PR → All changed files - Single file → Deep dive

1. Detect layers: React? Express? MongoDB? Node.js?
2. If ambiguous → ask user

Phase 2: Review by Priority

Load reference files ON-DEMAND when you hit MERN-specific edge cases.

Phase 3: Report

Use the output format below. Offer to fix starting with Critical.

Output Format

# MERN Code Review

## Project Health
- Build: [Compiles / X errors / Not checked]
- Tests: [X passing / X failing / None found]
- Blockers: [Any deployment blockers from docs]
- Large files: [Files >500 lines]

## Scope
[What was reviewed]

## Summary
- Files reviewed: X
- Issues: X Critical, X Important, X Suggestions

## Critical (Must Fix)
### [C1] Category: Title
**File:** `path:line`
**Why:** [1-2 sentences]
**Fix:** [Code or instruction]

## Important (Should Fix)
### [I1] Category: Title
...

## Suggestions
- `file:line` - Note

## What's Good
- [Positive observations]

## Verdict
[Ready to deploy / Blocked / Needs fixes] - [1 sentence reason]

---
**Ready to fix these?** Starting with Critical issues.

Checklists

Minimum required checks. Report other issues you find during review.

Blockers (Check First)

• Project compiles without errors
• No "DO NOT DEPLOY" or similar warnings in docs
• No critical security advisories in npm audit

Security

• No $where, $ne, $regex with user input (NoSQL injection/ReDoS)
• No dangerouslySetInnerHTML without DOMPurify
• JWT in httpOnly cookies, not localStorage
• Secrets in env vars, not hardcoded (check config files too, not just code)
• Helmet middleware configured
• CORS properly restricted
• Rate limiting on auth endpoints
• Input validation on all endpoints
• No eval() or new Function() with user input

Maintainability

• No file >500 lines (god files)
• No function >50 lines
• No class/component with >20 methods
• No deep nesting (>4 levels)
• No copy-paste blocks >10 lines (DRY)
• Clear naming (no cryptic abbreviations)
• Consistent code style

Performance

• No N+1 queries (use populate/$lookup)
• Indexes on frequently queried fields
• .lean() for read-only Mongoose queries
• No fs.readFileSync in request handlers
• React.memo on expensive components
• useCallback/useMemo where beneficial
• Pagination on list endpoints

Testing

• Tests exist for critical paths (auth, payments, core flows)
• Test coverage reasonable (>50% for services)
• No skipped/commented-out tests
• Tests actually assert behavior (not just "doesn't crash")
• Mocks don't hide real integration issues

Best Practices

• Async errors handled (try/catch or error middleware)
• useEffect cleanup functions present
• No floating promises (unhandled async)
• Middleware order correct (body-parser before routes, error handler last)
• Environment variables validated at startup
• Graceful shutdown handlers

Architecture

• Consistent API response format
• Service layer between controllers and DB
• Types aligned frontend/backend
• No circular dependencies
• Clear module boundaries
• No god components (React >300 lines)
• State management appropriate for complexity

Red Flags (Immediate Critical)

These are automatic Critical issues:

• eval(), new Function() with user input
• Hardcoded secrets/credentials in code
• dangerouslySetInnerHTML without sanitization
• JWT/auth tokens in localStorage
• Missing auth middleware on protected routes
• $where clause with user input
• File >1000 lines
• "DO NOT DEPLOY" in project docs
• npm audit critical vulnerabilities

Scope Calibration

Reference Files

Load ONLY when you encounter MERN-specific patterns you need to verify:

Do NOT load all references upfront. They're for edge cases, not general review.

Don't

• Don't claim "no issues found" without actually searching for them
• Don't report on code you haven't read
• Don't classify style issues as Critical

Examples

God File Detection

Found: EventService.ts - 6,165 lines
→ Critical [C1] Maintainability: God file
→ Recommend split into: EventQueryService, EventBookingService,
   EventGuestService, EventInviteService (~500 lines each)

Missing Health Check

Found: CURRENT_STATUS_AND_BUGS.md contains "DO NOT DEPLOY"
→ Critical [C1] Blocker: Deployment blocked by known issues
→ Fix TypeScript errors in EditEventModal.tsx before proceeding

Security + Specific Fix

Found: No Helmet middleware in index.ts
→ Critical [C2] Security: Missing security headers
→ Fix: npm install helmet && app.use(helmet())