Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

deep-research(深入研究)

deep-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

deep-research 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 63,559。

总安装 315周安装 13GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 103核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:deep-research(深入研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/5dlabs/cto
仓库路径:skills/deep-research
安装命令:
npx skills add 5dlabs/cto --skill "deep-research"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add 5dlabs/cto --skill "deep-research"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

deep-research 用于深度信息搜集与交叉验证。适用于竞品分析、趋势预测或复杂问题解答场景。通过 npx skills add 5dlabs/cto --skill "deep-research" 安装,建议设置可信源白名单。使用前需界定研究边界防止无限递归。应标注信息来源并保持立场中立客观。

来源仓库内路径:skills/deep-research

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add 5dlabs/cto --skill "deep-research";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

deep-research 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add 5dlabs/cto --skill "deep-research"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

deep-research 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

deep-research 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

deep-research 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

deep-research 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 315 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 103 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

deep-research 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
deep-research

深入研究 · 本页

315—接触敏感数据MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Deep Research Skill

Perform comprehensive technical research using the Firecrawl Agent API for autonomous web investigation. Use this skill when tasks require understanding external patterns, competitive analysis, or finding implementation examples.

When to Trigger Deep Research

Scan for these patterns in PRDs and task requirements:

PatternExampleResearch Action
"like X" references"authentication like Auth0"Research how Auth0 implements it
"similar to" comparisons"similar to Stripe webhooks"Study Stripe's webhook patterns
Competitive mentions"compete with Notion"Analyze Notion's architecture
Best practices requests"follow industry standards"Survey how leaders solve it
Unfamiliar tech"use CRDT for sync"Find CRDT implementation examples
"how do others" questions"how do others handle this?"Multi-source investigation

Research Protocol

Step 1: Identify Research Needs

Before generating tasks, scan the PRD for:

  1. External references - Named products, services, or standards
  2. Comparative requirements - "better than", "like", "similar to"
  3. Technical unknowns - Unfamiliar patterns or technologies
  4. Best practice requests - "industry standard", "production-ready"

Step 2: Choose the Right Tool

Research TypeToolWhy
Competitive analysisfirecrawl_agentMulti-site autonomous research
Implementation patternsoctocode_githubSearchCodeSearches actual production code across GitHub
Library documentationcontext7Official, structured docs
Code examples from GitHuboctocode_githubSearchCodeReal production code with semantic search
How major projects solve Xoctocode_githubSearchRepositoriesFind reference implementations
PR discussions/fixesoctocode_githubSearchPullRequestsLearn how issues were resolved
Specific page contentfirecrawl_scrapeKnown URL, faster

Step 3: Execute Research

Using Firecrawl Agent
firecrawl_agent({
  prompt: "YOUR RESEARCH QUESTION - be specific",
  schema: {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "findings": {
        "type": "array",
        "items": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "source": { "type": "string" },
            "approach": { "type": "string" },
            "details": { "type": "string" },
            "tradeoffs": { "type": "string" }
          }
        }
      },
      "recommendation": { "type": "string" }
    }
  }
})

Step 4: Structure Output

Always format research findings as:

## Research: [Topic]

### Summary
[2-3 sentence key takeaway]

### Findings

| Source | Approach | Key Details |
|--------|----------|-------------|
| Auth0 | JWT + refresh rotation | 15min access, 7d refresh |
| Clerk | Session tokens | Server-side validation |

### Recommendation
[How this applies to the current task]

### Sources
- [URL 1] - Description
- [URL 2] - Description

Common Research Patterns

Competitive Analysis

When PRD mentions competitors or "like X":

firecrawl_agent({
  prompt: "Compare how [Competitor A], [Competitor B], and [Competitor C] implement [feature]. Focus on [specific aspects from PRD].",
  schema: {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "providers": {
        "type": "array",
        "items": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "name": { "type": "string" },
            "approach": { "type": "string" },
            "strengths": { "type": "string" },
            "weaknesses": { "type": "string" }
          }
        }
      },
      "recommendation": { "type": "string" }
    }
  }
})

Implementation Patterns

When PRD requires unfamiliar technology:

firecrawl_agent({
  prompt: "Find production examples of [technology] being used for [use case]. Include code patterns, gotchas, and performance considerations.",
  schema: {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "examples": {
        "type": "array",
        "items": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "source": { "type": "string" },
            "pattern": { "type": "string" },
            "code_example": { "type": "string" },
            "gotchas": { "type": "string" }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
})

Architecture Research

When designing new systems:

firecrawl_agent({
  prompt: "What architectures do major [domain] platforms use for [requirement]? Compare approaches from [Company A], [Company B], etc.",
  schema: {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "architectures": {
        "type": "array",
        "items": {
          "type": "object",
          "properties": {
            "company": { "type": "string" },
            "architecture": { "type": "string" },
            "scale": { "type": "string" },
            "tradeoffs": { "type": "string" }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
})

Best Practices

When PRD requests "industry standard" approaches:

firecrawl_agent({
  prompt: "What are current best practices for [topic] in [year]? Focus on [specific requirements]. Include examples from production systems."
})

Integrating Research into Tasks

Research findings should be embedded in task details fields:

{
  "id": "5",
  "title": "Nova: Implement Refresh Token Rotation",
  "agentHint": "nova",
  "details": "## Requirements\nImplement refresh token rotation for session management.\n\n## Research Findings\nBased on competitive analysis:\n- Auth0: 15min access tokens, 7-day refresh tokens with rotation\n- Clerk: Session-based with server validation\n- Supabase: JWT with configurable expiry\n\n## Recommended Approach\nFollow Auth0 pattern with:\n- 15-minute access token lifetime\n- 7-day refresh token with single-use rotation\n- Revocation on suspicious activity\n\n## Code Signatures\n```typescript\nexport const refreshToken = Effect.gen(function* () {\n  // Implementation based on research\n})\n```"
}

Cost Management

Firecrawl Agent pricing is dynamic. Optimize costs:

  1. Be specific - Vague prompts cost more
  2. Use schemas - Structured output reduces processing
  3. Provide URLs when known - Narrows search scope
  4. Batch related questions - One comprehensive query vs multiple small ones

When NOT to Use Deep Research

  • Library docs exist in Context7 - Use context7 instead
  • You know the exact URL - Use firecrawl_scrape
  • Simple factual lookup - Use firecrawl_search
  • Code examples from GitHub repos - Use octocode_githubSearchCode (semantic search across repos)
  • How React/major OSS projects do X - Use OctoCode to search their source

OctoCode Integration

For implementation pattern research, combine Firecrawl (web) with OctoCode (code):

# 1. Research how competitors approach the problem (web)
firecrawl_agent({ prompt: "How does Auth0 implement refresh token rotation?" })

# 2. Find actual implementations in open source (code)
octocode_githubSearchCode({
  query: "refresh token rotation",
  language: "typescript",
  stars: ">500"
})

# 3. Get library docs for the chosen approach
context7_get_library_docs({ libraryId: "/better-auth/better-auth", topic: "refresh tokens" })

Research Checklist

Before finalizing research-informed tasks:

  • All "like X" and "similar to" references researched
  • Competitive mentions analyzed
  • Unfamiliar technologies investigated
  • Research findings embedded in relevant task details
  • Sources cited for verification
  • Recommendations align with PRD requirements

平台分布

Claude Code

29.29%
按下载量换算30

windsurf

23.49%
按下载量换算24

trae

19.79%
按下载量换算20

OpenCode

13.13%
按下载量换算14

Codex

8.05%
按下载量换算8

Antigravity

4.03%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills