Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

terraform-engineer(Terraform 工程师)

用于辅助云资源、部署、容器、基础设施和运维自动化任务。它适合让 Agent 检查配置、整理部署步骤、分析资源状态、生成排障思路或辅助云服务接入。使用时需要明确目标环境、账号权限、区域和资源组,区分本地测试与生产操作;涉及删除资源、重启服务、修改网络或权限配置时,应先确认影响范围。

terraform-engineer 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 555。

总安装 2,739周安装 113GitHub Stars 76下载 895核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:terraform-engineer(Terraform 工程师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/404kidwiz/claude-supercode-skills
仓库路径:skills/terraform-engineer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/404kidwiz/claude-supercode-skills --skill terraform-engineer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/404kidwiz/claude-supercode-skills --skill terraform-engineer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

terraform-engineer 专注于基础设施即代码(IaC),擅长使用 Terraform 设计云资源模块和自动化部署流程。适用于新建 VPC、EKS、RDS 等云资源,重构单体配置为可复用模块,并实现 GitOps 驱动的基础设施管理。

在 Codex、Claude、Cursor 或 Gemini CLI 中辅助检查配置、生成部署步骤或分析资源状态。安装方式:通过 npx 从 GitHub 仓库添加,需明确目标环境、账号权限和资源组后再操作。注意:涉及删除、重启或网络变更时,应评估影响范围;生产环境操作前建议本地测试。

来源仓库内路径:skills/terraform-engineer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/404kidwiz/claude-supercode-skills --skill terr…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

terraform-engineer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/404kidwiz/claude-supercode-skills --skill terraform-engi…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

terraform-engineer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

terraform-engineer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

terraform-engineer 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

terraform-engineer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,739 次,近一周安装 113 次,下载 895 次,GitHub 76 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

terraform-engineer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
terraform-engineer

Terraform 工程师 · 本页

2,73976调用外部服务MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Terraform Engineer

Purpose

Provides Infrastructure as Code expertise specializing in Terraform and OpenTofu for cloud provisioning. Designs modular, scalable infrastructure with proper state management, remote backends, and GitOps-driven automation pipelines.

When to Use

  • Provisioning new cloud infrastructure (VPCs, EKS, RDS)
  • Refactoring monolithic Terraform code into reusable modules
  • Implementing "GitOps" for infrastructure (Atlantis/TFC)
  • Managing remote state, locking, and backend configuration
  • Writing custom providers or complex HCL logic (loops, conditionals)
  • Migrating/importing existing manual infrastructure into Terraform

Examples

Example 1: Multi-Cloud Landing Zone

Scenario: Building a secure, compliant multi-cloud landing zone.

Implementation:

  1. Created reusable modules for VPC, IAM, security groups
  2. Implemented remote state with S3 backend and DynamoDB locking
  3. Added variable validation and preconditions
  4. Implemented cost estimation and budget alerts
  5. Set up Terraform Cloud for state management

Results:

  • Infrastructure provisioning reduced from weeks to hours
  • 100% consistency across environments
  • Security compliance automated
  • 40% reduction in cloud costs through optimization

Example 2: Kubernetes Platform with EKS

Scenario: Building a production-ready Kubernetes platform.

Implementation:

  1. Created EKS module with managed node groups
  2. Implemented RBAC and service accounts
  3. Added network policies and security groups
  4. Configured secrets management with Vault integration
  5. Set up monitoring and observability

Results:

  • Platform deployment in under 30 minutes
  • Zero configuration drift
  • Built-in security controls
  • Clear upgrade path for K8s versions

Example 3: Legacy Infrastructure Migration

Scenario: Importing manually provisioned infrastructure into Terraform.

Implementation:

  1. Used terraform import for existing resources
  2. Created corresponding Terraform configurations
  3. Implemented state mv for resource reorganization
  4. Verified no changes during import
  5. Established Terraform as source of truth

Results:

  • 200+ resources migrated to Terraform
  • Infrastructure now version controlled
  • Enables infrastructure as code workflows
  • Improved audit and compliance

Best Practices

State Management

  • Remote Backend: Always use remote state (S3, GCS, Terraform Cloud)
  • State Locking: Prevent concurrent modifications
  • State Isolation: Separate state for environments
  • Backup: Enable state versioning

Module Development

  • Single Responsibility: Each module does one thing well
  • Version Pinning: Lock module versions
  • Documentation: Document inputs, outputs, behavior
  • Testing: Test modules before publishing

Code Quality

  • Formatting: Use terraform fmt consistently
  • Validation: Run terraform validate
  • Linting: Use tflint for provider-specific issues
  • Security Scanning: Use tfsec/checkov

Collaboration

  • Code Review: All changes reviewed before merge
  • Workspace Strategy: Use workspaces for environment isolation
  • Variable Management: Use variable files, not hardcoding
  • Output Documentation: Document important outputs


2. Decision Framework

State Management Strategy

ScaleStrategyBackend
IndividualLocal Statelocal (Not recommended for prod)
Small TeamRemote State + Lockings3 + DynamoDB (AWS) / azurerm (Azure)
EnterpriseManaged State + RunsTerraform Cloud / spacelift / env0
GitOpsPR-driven RunsAtlantis (Self-hosted)

Module Architecture

What are you building?
│
├─ **Root Module** (The "Glue")
│  ├─ `main.tf`: Instantiates child modules
│  ├─ `providers.tf`: Provider config
│  └─ `backend.tf`: State config
│
├─ **Child Modules** (Reusable)
│  ├─ **Resource Modules**: Wraps single resource (e.g., `s3-secure-bucket`)
│  │  └─ Enforces tagging, encryption, logging defaults.
│  │
│  └─ **Infrastructure Modules**: Logical group (e.g., `vpc-with-peering`)
│     └─ Combines VPC, Subnets, Route Tables, NAT Gateways.
│
└─ **Composition** (Terragrunt/Workspaces)
   ├─ `prod/`
   ├─ `stage/`
   └─ `dev/`

Terraform vs. The World

ToolApproachBest For
TerraformHCL (Declarative)Industry standard, massive ecosystem.
PulumiGeneral Purpose Lang (TS/Py)Devs who hate HCL, dynamic logic.
CrossplaneK8s Custom ResourcesControl planes, self-service platforms.
CloudFormationYAML/JSONAWS purists (drift detection is native).

Red Flags → Escalate to security-engineer:

  • Hardcoded AWS keys in provider block
  • State files stored in git (terraform.tfstate)
  • Security Groups allowing 0.0.0.0/0 on SSH/RDP
  • S3 buckets public by default


3. Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Production AWS VPC (Modular)

Goal: Create a 3-tier VPC network using the community module.

Steps:

  1. Dependency Definition (versions.tf) terraform {required_version = ">= 1.5.0" required_providers {aws = {source = "hashicorp/aws" version = "~> 5.0"}}}
  2. Implementation (main.tf) module "vpc" {source = "terraform-aws-modules/vpc/aws" version = "5.5.1" name = "prod-vpc" cidr = "10.0.0.0/16" azs = ["us-east-1a", "us-east-1b", "us-east-1c"] private_subnets = ["10.0.1.0/24", "10.0.2.0/24", "10.0.3.0/24"] public_subnets = ["10.0.101.0/24", "10.0.102.0/24", "10.0.103.0/24"] enable_nat_gateway = true single_nat_gateway = false # High Availability enable_vpn_gateway = false tags = {Environment = "Production" Terraform = "true"}}
  3. Outputs (outputs.tf) output "vpc_id" {description = "The ID of the VPC" value = module.vpc.vpc_id}


Workflow 3: Importing Existing Infrastructure

Goal: Bring a manually created EC2 instance under Terraform control.

Steps:

  1. Identify Resource ID

- AWS Console → EC2 → Instance ID: i-0123456789abcdef0

  1. Write Terraform Code resource "aws_instance" "legacy_server" {ami = "ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0" instance_type = "t2.micro" # Fill in other known details...}
  2. Run Import terraform import aws_instance.legacy_server i-0123456789abcdef0 *(Or use import block in TF 1.5+)* import {to = aws_instance.legacy_server id = "i-0123456789abcdef0"}
  3. Reconcile

- Run terraform plan. - Update code to match the state until "No changes" is reported.



5. Anti-Patterns & Gotchas

❌ Anti-Pattern 1: Monolithic State File

What it looks like:

  • One main.tf controlling VPC, Database, EKS, and 50 Microservices.
  • terraform plan takes 10 minutes.

Why it fails:

  • Blast Radius: One error breaks everything.
  • Performance: API rate limits (AWS Throttling).
  • Locking: Dev A blocks Dev B.

Correct approach:

  • Split State: Separate network, data, app-cluster.
  • Use terraform_remote_state data source to read outputs from other layers.

❌ Anti-Pattern 2: Hardcoding Environments

What it looks like:

  • vpc-prod.tf, vpc-dev.tf files with duplicated code.

Why it fails:

  • Drift between environments.
  • Double maintenance.

Correct approach:

  • Workspaces: Use terraform workspace with var.environment.
  • Tfvars: prod.tfvars vs dev.tfvars.
  • Modules: Reuse the same logic, pass different variables.

❌ Anti-Pattern 3: Ignoring .gitignore

What it looks like:

  • Committing .terraform/ directory (plugins).
  • Committing terraform.tfvars (secrets).

Why it fails:

  • Repo bloat.
  • Security leak.

Correct approach:

  • Standard .gitignore for Terraform: .terraform/ *.tfstate *.tfstate.backup *.tfvars.terraform.lock.hcl (Commit this one!)


7. Quality Checklist

Code Quality:

  • Formatting: Run terraform fmt -recursive.
  • Validation: Run terraform validate.
  • Linting: Run tflint for provider-specific issues.
  • Docs: Generate README using terraform-docs.

Security:

  • Secrets: No plain text secrets (Use KMS/Vault/Secrets Manager).
  • Encryption: encrypted = true on all storage (EBS, S3, RDS).
  • Public Access: Locked down (S3 Block Public Access).

Reliability:

  • State: Remote backend configured with locking.
  • Versions: Provider and Terraform versions pinned (e.g., ~> 5.0).
  • Cleanup: destroy provisioners tested (or protection enabled for DBs).

Anti-Patterns

State Management Anti-Patterns

  • Local State: Using local state files - always use remote backends
  • State Drift: Manual changes outside Terraform - use only Terraform for changes
  • State Lock Contention: No state locking - implement proper locking
  • State Corruption: Editing state files manually - never manually edit state

Module Anti-Patterns

  • Monolithic Modules: Large, unwieldy modules - split into focused modules
  • Hardcoded Values: Using values instead of variables - parameterize everything
  • Module Version Chaos: No version pinning - pin module versions
  • Deep Module Nesting: Over-nested module structures - keep module hierarchy flat

Resource Anti-Patterns

  • Resource Spam: Many small resources instead of patterns - use resource grouping
  • Lifecycle Lock: Resources that can't update - avoid create_before_destroy conflicts
  • Ignored Changes: Overusing ignore_changes - understand and manage changes
  • Sensitive Data Exposure: Plain text secrets in state - use sensitive flag

Code Organization Anti-Patterns

  • Flat Structure: No directory organization - use modular structure
  • Duplication: Repeated code blocks - use modules and for_each
  • No Formatting: Unformatted HCL code - use terraform fmt
  • Missing Documentation: undocumented modules - document all inputs/outputs

平台分布

Claude Code

26.48%
按下载量换算237

OpenCode

25.35%
按下载量换算227

windsurf

16.14%
按下载量换算144

Codex

13.22%
按下载量换算118

Cursor

7.87%
按下载量换算70

Gemini CLI

3.33%
按下载量换算30

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills